User talk:Fairyspit

Benedict Cumberbatch

Aikatastrophe, the file you continue trying to upload doesn't exist therefore it isn't showing up so please stop changing it. Lady Lotus (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cumberbatch as The Creature in the stage production Frankenstein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cumberbatch as The Creature in the stage production Frankenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official poster of the Frankenstein stage production.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official poster of the Frankenstein stage production.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Benedict Cumberbatch as the The Creature in Danny Boyle's Stage Production of Frankenstein in 2011.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as the The Creature in Danny Boyle's Stage Production of Frankenstein in 2011.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Creature in Danny Boyle's stage production of Frankenstein at the Royal National Theatre in London, 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Creature in Danny Boyle's stage production of Frankenstein at the Royal National Theatre in London, 2011.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:UK DVD Cover of Parade's End with Benedict Cumberbatch, Rebecca Hall and Adelaide Clemens.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:UK DVD Cover of Parade's End with Benedict Cumberbatch, Rebecca Hall and Adelaide Clemens.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Monster in Danny Boyle’s Frankenstein play at the Royal National Theatre in 2011.png

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Monster in Danny Boyle’s Frankenstein play at the Royal National Theatre in 2011.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Monster in Danny Boyle’s stage production of Frankenstein at the Royal National Theatre in 2011.png

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as The Monster in Danny Boyle’s stage production of Frankenstein at the Royal National Theatre in 2011.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cabin Pressure (radio series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Finnemore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Benedict Cumberbatch as the creature in Frankenstein in 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as the creature in Frankenstein in 2011.jpg, which you've sourced to http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01258/Frankenstein_1258895a.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:John Finnemore, Stephanie Cole, Roger Allam and Benedict Cumberbatch in costume for a promotional photo for Cabin Pressure.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Finnemore, Stephanie Cole, Roger Allam and Benedict Cumberbatch in costume for a promotional photo for Cabin Pressure.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01l02j9. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cumberbatch as The Monster in 2011.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Cumberbatch as The Monster in 2011.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fifth Estate (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dreamworks Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible DYK

Hi, I was wondering if you were interested in taking The Fifth Estate (film) to a WP:DYK?? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fifth Estate (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dreamworks Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benedict Cumberbatch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherlock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm McGeddon. Your recent edit to the page Khan Noonien Singh‎ appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aikatastrophe. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 06:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 06:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please avoid using Bare URLs as you have at Star Trek Into Darkness. Please see Referencing for beginners and Referencing for beginners with citation templates for guidance.

Your edits to that movies' page here and here made a mess of a reference. I have now fixed it, though it took a few tries! Please be more careful in future and if editing a reference manually check that the ref. is appearing correctly. Thanks, 220 of ^Borg 06:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan in Star Trek into Darkness.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan in Star Trek into Darkness.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Man of Steel (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Shannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Daniel Bruhl as Daniel Domscheitberg and Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Bruhl as Daniel Domscheitberg and Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheitberg filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheitberg filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Daniel Bruhl as Daniel Domscheitberg and Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png

A tag has been placed on File:Daniel Bruhl as Daniel Domscheitberg and Benedict Cumberbatch as Julian Assange filming The Fifth Estate in Iceland.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Simeondahl (talk) 01:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Katia Elizarova at King's Road, Chelsea, London.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Katia Elizarova at King's Road, Chelsea, London.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Katia Elizarova at King's Road, Chelsea, London.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Katia Elizarova at King's Road, Chelsea, London.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mulitple edits to Katia Elizarova ==

Unnecessary edits and revisions are being reported, in violation of the 3RR rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.241.16.149 (talk) 10:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:3RR#The_three-revert_rule

You are in violation of The 3 Revert Rule. Please stop your unconstructive editing at Katia Elizarova and discuss your concerns on the article's talk page. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aikatastrophe, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Flat Out let's discuss it 12:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for violating WP:3RR and abusing multiple accounts, as you did at Katia Elizarova. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerusalem (2013 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Geographic and 3D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garrick Club may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lyndsey turner.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lyndsey turner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lyndsey Turner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Annajamesphoto.png

A tag has been placed on File:Annajamesphoto.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Blurred Lines 02:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 02:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Graham Moore (writer)

Hello Aikatastrophe,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Graham Moore (writer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrScorch6200 (talk) 05:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Imitation Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Beard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Imitation Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Beard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cumberbatchattoronto.png

A tag has been placed on File:Cumberbatchattoronto.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Armitage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suki Waterhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dumb deletion

Why are you removing factual accuracy from a page - Katia Elizarova. Malicious attempts to re-write history are not appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.52.20 (talk) 02:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 03:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your long-term page blanking

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Fairyspit, I echo Toccata quarta's warning. You should not be removing talk page comments unless you have a basis for doing so. Also, if you think there's a basis for removing them (in this instance, I don't see it), at a minimum state it in the edit summary.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lady Lotus • talk 18:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lady Lotus • talk 17:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per the results of this investigation you have been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumberbatchtheatre(cropped).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cumberbatchtheatre(cropped).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumberbatchtheatre.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cumberbatchtheatre.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benedict Cumberbatch at TIFF.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benedict Cumberbatch at TIFF.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumberbatchstagedoornationaltheatre.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cumberbatchstagedoornationaltheatre.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumberbatchtimecover.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cumberbatchtimecover.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lyndsey Turner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyndsey Turner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndsey Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lady Lotus • talk 21:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Annajamesphoto.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Annajamesphoto.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lady Lotus • talk 13:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Annajamesphoto.png

Thanks for uploading File:Annajamesphoto.png, which you've attributed to False claim to ownership. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lady Lotus • talk 22:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lady Lotus • talk 22:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Banned

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Guy (Help!) 13:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that Fairyspit has been blocked from editing, just what do you expect to achieve by posting these notifications on their talk page? Toccata quarta (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Okay, I did it. I had multiple accounts. I'll not be doing again. I'll have a break from Wiki for a long while. Some final requests though for the improvement of Wiki as a whole. Please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, his parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fairyspit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, I will not do it again. I'm leaning towards general Hollywood and entertainment announcements though. Some final requests, please review Cumberbatch's lead paragraph because it's goddamn awful. Who the hell cares if his actors are parents? A lot of actors have way more famous parents and that detail isn't even in their leads. They're reserved in their background sections. He's not known to the world by being the son of Timothy Carlton and Wanda Ventham. He is known for his work in theatre, film, television and radio. And a big FYI, he's parents are still alive and still acting so the use of "were" is not only grammatically incorrect and a violation of biography rule but it's also completely offending! And please don't be ethnocentric and cater only to American audience and disregard his theatre and radio/voice work credits. He works equally in all those mediums. If you check his profiles, they always mention his work in four mediums because he said himself that he likes all four. And his schooling, in the lead paragraphs? Come on! And him being interested in drama at an early age thus pursuing an acting career is off the mark. He wanted to study Law in university because his parents dissuaded him to go into acting. He didn't always wanted that path. Seriously, even they're administrators you should check their edits. The previous lead was completely more appropriate and comprehensive. And please, please be consistent and put dates on every actor's credits!!! Lyndsey Turner needs a wiki page. Anyone literate in British theatre knows her because she's well-regarded and has directed major productions in the RSC and West End. There are more undeserved articles here and you can't give her one? You're depriving the people information! Lastly, James McAvoy's lead needs a complete re-write. Fairyspit (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your statement "I will not do it again" is not credible. Your history, including the last block of one of your socks, which was just a few hours ago, makes that clear. In addition, your repetitious comments (in bold) on this page indicate that you care more about controling the content of articles, which in and of itself is a problem, than you do about how you do it. Bbb23 (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've had enough. That's why. And I was re-writing my requests. And I am hoping you read it. Because seriously, the "were" about Cumberbatch's parents is wrong in all sorts of ways. They're not dead. They're not retired (their most recent credit is 2014). I'm just trying to help here because it's utterly embarrassing. Of course I'm concerned about the content. And have I created another account? I'm kindly requesting now am I? Because at this point that's the only way I can contribute and pinpoint what's wrong in these articles.Fairyspit (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wait six months with no more socking and come back and ask again. If you continue to abuse this page, I'll revoke your talk page access to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I know you're not going to unblock me and I wasn't aware I was abusing this page. I just thought it would be appropriate to answer in all those notices. I am begging though to consider my edit requests (Cumberbatch's and McAvoy's leads), treat it as discussions in a regular talk page because these articles need attention and if not, misinformation and sloppy content will be associated with Wikipedia and I know you don't want that too.Fairyspit (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DVD cover of the TV Movie Hawking.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DVD cover of the TV Movie Hawking.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graham Moore (writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Moore (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Moore (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cabin Pressure CD Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cabin Pressure CD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DVD Cover of The Last Enemy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DVD Cover of The Last Enemy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LAMDA150yearsLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LAMDA150yearsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smaugmoviestill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smaugmoviestill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dvdcoverwreckers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LAMDAlogoblack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LAMDAlogoblack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Garrick Club.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Garrick Club.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DVD Cover of The Last Enemy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DVD Cover of The Last Enemy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Final poster of the 2013 documentary film entitled Jerusalem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final poster of the 2013 documentary film entitled Jerusalem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit. Thank you. Ben^Yes? 17:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]