User talk:Fabricationary

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fabricationary has not edited Wikipedia since January 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page. Please leave a message at the bottom of the page and sign your name at the end of your message with four tildes like this: ~~~~. I will respond on your talk page, if applicable. Thanks :). Fabricationary 22:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp ^laudare 01:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you

What are you going to do?? Terminate my account...this site is mint man....everything you do you get yelled at for...

Pazal

Hi Fabricationary. As the creator of the page for the micronation Pazal, I was wondering why you chose to delete it? Although I don't expect the page to be restored, I'd like to discuss this with you. Pazal is a micronation, it has no international recognition - however, it has strong recognition in the micronational world. We have nearly 150 citizens and write ups in The Guardian, the Telegraph, The New York Times and various newspapers local to my own territorial region. We have also featured on national radio. As micronations go, we're quite highly placed, and we have a strongly legitimate foundation. The truth is that we're not internet based, but neither are a number of things. The two things that really cut me were the comments (from others) "delusions of grandeur" (as most of this had nothing to do with me anyway!) and the remarks on the site (The website also cost money to host and I can assure you there aren't any adverts :) !) As you're a student of Chinese history and politics, I'd have imagined you'd have come accross Pazal at least briefly. Again, thanks for reading and I look forward to discussing this further with you. All the best, Johnny. Jamescbernthal 20:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Jamescbernthal[reply]

re Future events

See also the Playstation 3 entries for November 11 and November 17. Jim Douglas 02:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have some guidelines about what kind of entries we can yank from those pages? The problem cases are no-name actors or singers or (gak) wrestlers. I'm tempted to pull more of the cruft, but it's hard to argue the point when the no-name in question has a Wikipedia entry. -- Jim Douglas 02:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just as a fr'instance, the Kenny Kim article was created last week and immediately added to September 20. I yanked it from the day page, and it was added back. I added my concerns about the article on Talk:Kenny Kim and User talk:Dude77; so far, no response. I'm pondering nominating the article for deletion if there's no response in a few days. Am I completely off-base? -- Jim Douglas 03:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI -- Jim Douglas 17:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what is going on

Hi,

Today when I checked smth. on Wiki I found I have a message. It came from you apparently.

"Your recent edit to Hillary Rodham Clinton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 06:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hillary Rodham Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 06:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)"''

Well, I never ever neither visited that page before nor changed or edited sth. there. I received other messages too, that from my IP adress sb. made useless changes in articled. Well, it is not me and I have no idea how comes! Best regards ShiLei

Congrats!

You have recently been added to my Respect List. Clay4president 21:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed in conflict with other editor, if possible

If not help, then at least advice.

I'm currently involved in discussing the Homophobia article on the article's Talk page - the article itself has been locked after an edit war, and the topic has gone to Mediation, but I'm really unclear about what the mediator can do, if anything - she doesn't seem to have done anything up to now.

The Talk:Homophobia page has gone slightly mad, and I'm currently conflicted with one other editor in particular, R-b-j.

R-b-j asserts I called him a : at this point I'd be willing to apologise for that, if it would mean he'd just stick to the point at hand and leave out the long personal anecdotes about how he worked on the Dean campaign! (I am, at this point, unclear if I did call him a , or if he decided I was calling him a based on something else I wrote, but he claims not to be attacking me because of that, and indeed he claims not to be attacking me at all...)

My previous experience of personal attacks was quite clear cut: an anonymous editor was abusing me, I reported them to an admin, eventually anon was banned. This is less clear-cut: R-b-j claims to be only attacking my "arguing style", and not me, but in practice I find it hard to tell the difference, and certainly, R-b-j's personalising the debate really isn't helping cool it down. R-b-j is one of the parties named in the Mediation: I presume therefore we have to get agreement: but I can't see specifically how R-b-j and I will ever manage to agree. Nor do I really want to see R-b-j banned: I just want him/her/it to quit with the personal attacks (whether on me or on my arguing style) and just discuss the topic to hand.

I've repeatedly requested this: R-b-j appears to take offense. There's now a whole section labelled who is playing the games? that really adds nothing to the debate at hand: it's all about how wrong I am.

Sorry for this lengthy comment: I will be very grateful for any advice/help you can provide.

Yonmei 19:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

RE: Welcome...thank you. Appreciate the welcome note. Akloki 10:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Akloki[reply]

thanks for the welcome and the note about the four tildas. Jessicanr 20:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Vandalism warnings: I have never even heard of "Drawball"!! ??

I received a very stern warning about vandalism to the entry "Drawball" which appears not to exist now and which I never in my life have even seen. Please check your facts here as I am NOT responsible for ANY vandalism, period. Further, I have made positive, constructive changes in the Martin Luther King entry, and I would certainly hope this is not some form retaliation for those changes (adding that he is considered one of America's best public speakers, etc.) I've had cordial exchanges with user jpGordon and he would surely note that I have respect for this site and its contents.

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.223.153.156 (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

August 19

I know, I didnt intend that to be a permenant change. I just wonted to see me on there as like a joke. I thought it would be there for 5 minutes and get deleted. -Count —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Countmall (talk • contribs) 21:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Sure, I won't do it again. If I do, I'll delete it once I'm satified (like 10 mintues)

Thank You!

I am very proud of my new star. Since I often find useful information on Wikipedia for my daily events page on the French RockDetente radio station network web site, I thought it would be a good opportunity to contribute myself to that great project. Igoulet 15:03, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Carpet9

how do you get those headers like one above that says Thank you?

i notice your link links to a user page. Where is mine and what can I put on it? The boxes look really cool. Carpet9

Thank you. I just figured out what edit summaries are. where can I see a list of recent changes on this wiki? Carpet9 17:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 19

Hey, I didn't make that weird hip hop artist edit. That was made seconds before you changed it. Refer to the history of the article, and your comment about it being my edit. Just a head's up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zinc2005 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

attack pages

Thanks for identifying attaackpages for speedy deletions. You can further help by letting the creator know by using {{subst:attack|pagename}}. That way a pattern can be quickly established and the user blocked if needed. Thanks Agathoclea 09:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:New World Man

He was chaning British to English without discussion. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's controversial. Best to get consensus on such things. (I'm Amnerican, it's not my fight). User:Zoe|(talk) 00:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 21

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit about Shane Warne. Does a 'global scale' count if he is known to many cricket-playing countries? ie. West Indies, India, Pakistan, New Zealand, England, etc. There are more, I just don't want to list them and make this message too long. - Vicer 04:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's a better place to put it. Thanks - Vicer 06:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberley Walsh

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but slightly modifying an image caption ís a minor edit. As a rule of thumb, if an edit takes a minute or less, I mark it as minor. If you did not like an edit made to Kimberley Walsh, rather than making a remark on the editor's talk page that may or may not be applicable, the proper course of dealing with that would be posting to Talk:Kimberley Walsh. Fabricationary 20:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the template that I added above makes clear, it's not the time taken, but the nature of the edit that counts. Yours wasn't merely a spelling correction, formatting, etc. but the re-adding of an image, with a new caption. By no stretch of the imagination that can be accounted minor.

The proper course of action when someone misuses the minor convention is to inform them of it on their Talk page, using one of the Wikipewdia templates explicitly made for that purpose — which is why that's what I did. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting a page to a prior version after what is considered a fair use image by multiple editors was removed because one editor disagreed and failed to discuss the change first is not a major change. I restored the image after seeing that a fellow experienced editor agreed with me. Why this is still a topic of discussion, or ever went beyond the article's talk page, is beyond me. Let's just drop it here. Fabricationary 03:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good grief, it's not a matter of opinion. The definition is there, plainly contradicting you. The discussion continues because, despite Wikipedia's clear definition of a minor edit ("A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Help:Minor edit), you insist that you're right. That doesn't bode well for your behaviour as an editor in general. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 30

Hello, you recently reverted some apparent vandal edits to the December 30 page. I made a minor edit (so I thought) to two dates, but when I viewed the page again, there were a couple of totally random edits scattered about. Did I do this somehow or was it from the guy before you or what. Sorry, I'm still learning, but can you tell what happened? Rossman7000 04:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Apparently, the software filter I have installed trapped out what it thought to be inappropriate words, as "death", "porn", "occult" were missing in the post-edit text. Thanks for fixing, Rossman7000 04:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 8

Regarding your edit on Matt Damon - what is the reason for removing "screenwriter" from his description? I know he's mainly known as an actor, but he won an oscar for screenwriting. Is there some rule about how brief/not brief for these entries? If so, please enlighten me. I'm relatively new to wikipedia. Thanks.--tess 21:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, your answer was very helpful.--tess 00:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Girlsaloudpromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girlsaloudpromo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 11:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GirlsAloud Sarah.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GirlsAloud Sarah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Play FayeHamlin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Play FayeHamlin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antm01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antm01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antm4c.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antm4c.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Dear Fabricationary,

First off, I would like to thank you for the work you do for Wikipedia. There are few people who take the time to keep Wikipedia nice and tidy. As a person who uses Wikipedia nearly daily, you have helped me greatly.

However, you have recently sent me a message concerning my alleged vandalism of the Wikipedia article "List of Religions." I never visited that page, I never heard of "Zoroastrianism," (until today, when I saw the message you sent) and I am non-religious (with no preference or spit toward any religion). Furthermore, I have only edited the grammar in the Wikipedia article about my district's high school in all my years on Wikipedia. All of these facts make it quite impossible for me to have written that Zoroastrianism is a satanic religion.

I am sorry that someone would feel that way. It was fully within your rights to revert the vandalism.

Thank you for your time and, once again, thank you for the policing you do on Wikipedia. I am very grateful for your dedication.

Sincerely, Victoria

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Galinda.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Galinda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ATeens ABBAGeneration.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ATeens ABBAGeneration.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DreamTIMvideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DreamTIMvideo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DreamHLUNvideo.jpg

I have tagged Image:DreamHLUNvideo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 21:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ATeensgroup.jpg

I have tagged Image:ATeensgroup.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 13:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Anaislameche.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Anaislameche.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Annasundstrand.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Annasundstrand.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:JanetLeon.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:JanetLeon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 11:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Huckapoo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Huckapoo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 18:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Meganhilty.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Meganhilty.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Annie D 05:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 18:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 18:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jenniferlaurathompson.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenniferlaurathompson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Reba.jpg

I have tagged Image:Reba.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:I5cd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:I5cd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SarahBrightman FlyAlbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SarahBrightman FlyAlbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Kendrakassebaum.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kendrakassebaum.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AARSwingSwing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AARSwingSwing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DreamwithKasey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DreamwithKasey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DreamwithMelissa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DreamwithMelissa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dream Reality.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dream Reality.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 02:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lailabagge allaboutlove.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lailabagge allaboutlove.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PYT DownWithMe.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:PYT DownWithMe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PYT SomethingMoreBeautiful.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:PYT SomethingMoreBeautiful.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Playselftitled.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Playselftitled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NoSecretsAlbum.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:NoSecretsAlbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KyleKavanaugh.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:KyleKavanaugh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kimstolz.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kimstolz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Amandalameche.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amandalameche.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:AngelFaith AlbumCover.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Amandalameche.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Amandalameche.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Amandalameche.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Amandalameche.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GirlsAloud SeeTheDay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GirlsAloud SeeTheDay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PlayReplay.jpg

I have tagged Image:PlayReplay.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soluna_members.jpg

I have tagged Image:Soluna_members.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 09:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Hemingway GA reassessment

As a leading editor of Ernest Hemingway, you may be interested in the individual WP:GAR discussion at Talk:Ernest Hemingway/GA1. Please consider helping to improve the article to retain its WP:GA rating.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud ISBY.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud ISBY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud Jump.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud Jump.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LGC.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud LGC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LHS.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud LHS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LoveMachine.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud LoveMachine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud SOTU.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud SOTU.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud SomethingKindaOoh.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud SomethingKindaOoh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud TS.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud TS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud WMU.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:GirlsAloud WMU.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rosie Munter

I have nominated Rosie Munter, an article that you contributed to, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Munter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rogerb67 (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:GirlsAloud Biology.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GirlsAloud Biology.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 05:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fabricationary! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 377 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Laila Bagge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Beu Sisters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Beu Sisters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alexf^(talk) 16:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GirlsAloud NoGoodAdvice.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GirlsAloud NoGoodAdvice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GirlsAloud ITWAN.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GirlsAloud ITWAN.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Freddie Mercury Article edit conflict

I need a conflict resolution regarding the Freddie Mercury Article. I recently added material to the page, and it was twice reverted by RyanTQuin. The first time, it was for "lack of verifiable sources" (even though said sources were in place). The second time, I refined and clarified the material (with verifiable sources). The second time, the same user reverted the article, and didn't even provide a reason. I have reverted the article myself (with reasons for doing so) and am requesting a consensus of senior editors, which I would be more than happy to live with. I'm sure you can look up the recent history of both reversions. For the record, the user in question has been involved in this before, and as a matter of fairness, I'm also submitting a complaint against said user, just for the record. Thanx.Swilliamrex (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Reality.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dream Reality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Reality.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dream Reality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Who are you

Pazal

re Future events

I have no idea what is going on

Congrats!

Help needed in conflict with other editor, if possible

thank you

RE: Vandalism warnings: I have never even heard of "Drawball"!! ??

August 19

Thank You!

From Carpet9

May 19

attack pages

User:New World Man

December 21

Kimberley Walsh

December 30

October 8

Image:Girlsaloudpromo.jpg

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GirlsAloud Sarah.jpg)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Play FayeHamlin.jpg)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antm01.jpg)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antm4c.jpg)

Hello!

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Galinda.jpg)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ATeens ABBAGeneration.jpg)

Fair use rationale for Image:DreamTIMvideo.jpg

Image:DreamHLUNvideo.jpg

Image:ATeensgroup.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Anaislameche.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Annasundstrand.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:JanetLeon.jpg

Image:Huckapoo.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Meganhilty.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Bratz RockAngelz.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Jenniferlaurathompson.jpg

Image:Reba.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:I5cd.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SarahBrightman FlyAlbum.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Kendrakassebaum.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AARSwingSwing.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DreamwithKasey.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DreamwithMelissa.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dream Reality.jpg

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheBeuSisters.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lailabagge allaboutlove.jpg)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PYT DownWithMe.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PYT SomethingMoreBeautiful.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Playselftitled.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NoSecretsAlbum.jpg

Image:KyleKavanaugh.jpg listed for deletion

Image:Kimstolz.jpg listed for deletion

Image copyright problem with Image:Amandalameche.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Amandalameche.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Amandalameche.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GirlsAloud SeeTheDay.jpg)

Image:PlayReplay.jpg

Image:Soluna_members.jpg

Ernest Hemingway GA reassessment

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud ISBY.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud Jump.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LGC.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LHS.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud LoveMachine.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud SOTU.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud SomethingKindaOoh.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud TS.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:GirlsAloud WMU.jpg

AfD nomination of Rosie Munter

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:GirlsAloud Biology.jpg

Unreferenced BLPs

Speedy deletion nomination of The Beu Sisters

Orphaned non-free media (File:GirlsAloud NoGoodAdvice.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GirlsAloud ITWAN.jpg)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Freddie Mercury Article edit conflict