User talk:ExtraEditing

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lionsgate Television has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lionsgate Television was changed by ExtraEditing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866582 on 2017-08-12T14:23:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sony Pictures Television has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sony Pictures Television was changed by ExtraEditing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921042 on 2017-09-14T10:29:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Trivialist. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at DreamWorks Classics. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Masem (t) 14:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of assets owned by Time Warner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GS ⋙ ☎ 23:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Nick Jr.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Temple Street

Hi there. It doesn’t make any sense to change the Temple Street category to be for Boat Rocker Media. Temple Street is the production company, Boat Rocker the parent. It makes much more sense to put the Temple Street as a subcategory to Boat Rocker. By moving stuff to Boat Rocker you’re making things less granular. Please explain why this has been done as there are no discussions I can see. Canterbury Tail talk 19:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Paramount Television programs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ExtraEditing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Entertainment One programs

Hello, ExtraEditing,

Thanks for creating List of Entertainment One programs! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Entertainment One programs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Entertainment One programs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Paramount Television programs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Henry Danger, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on South Park. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WarnerMedia

Please don't move every television series produced by a WarnerMedia-related company into Category:Television series by WarnerMedia Entertainment. If a show was originally produced by HBO Downtown Productions, or Studio T, it should remain in that category. Warner's restructuring does not negate which company originally produced a show, and dumping them all into a WarnerMedia category is misleading and confusing, especially when a show was produced well before WarnerMedia's inception. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Paramount Television into Paramount Television (original). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disney–ABC Home Entertainment and Television Distribution

Your recent editing history at Disney–ABC Home Entertainment and Television Distribution shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Spshu (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find it funny that you’re telling someone not to engage in a edit war when you’ve been involved in edit wars for numerous time and have gotten blocked for most of them. Don’t tell someone about a rule that you fail to follow yourself. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Walt Disney Television warring

Your recent editing history at Template:Walt Disney Television shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Do not insert, Fox acquired units as they have little to do with Walt Disney Television. They were acquired under Fox. There is no ABC Production Studios, while there is ABC Studios, which is listed. Talk is already under way: Template talk:Walt Disney Television#Fox merger dump. Spshu (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That goes for you too, bud. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Tyler Moore and Category:20th Century Fox people

Please stop adding this category to Mary Tyler Moore. Just because MTM was on a program distributred by Fox doesn't make her a "20th Century Fox person" any more than my having once worked on a show produced by Michael Douglas makes me a "Michael Douglas person". Your return of the cat after my removal is a violation of WP:BRD, which I suggest you read. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

She had founded the MTM company herself, that's why I added the category. ExtraEditing (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Entertainment One programs

Hello, ExtraEditing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Entertainment One programs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Entertainment One programs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Entertainment One programs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Entertainment One programs (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taewangkorea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:LISTN stand-alone lists must have references that talk about the list as a whole. This draft has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Entertainment One programs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Entertainment One programs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taewangkorea (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ExtraEditing! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taewangkorea (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of assets owned by ViacomCBS

It has not happened yet ~ you should have taken it to the talk page before you reverted my edit ~ you can do as you please but there are other editors that will revert all the work you have done because it is not finalized yet ~ by the way nice to meet you ~mitch~ (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am only updating the categories and the templates only, I not going to change the owners on the pages for the companies until the deal is done. ExtraEditing (talk) 23:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of it should be done until the deal closes. Wait. There is no deadline. oknazevad (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding this category...now. Columbia House was owned by a record company that hasn't been related to CBS since 1989. We don't transfer old companies to a new company if they had nothing to do with it, and most importantly, the deal has not closed. Nate • (chatter) 18:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing parent parameters on CBS/Viacom pages -- the merger has not closed yet and your edits are essentially adding inaccurate information to articles. Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ExtraEditing, you need to listen to what people are saying, discuss edits that are opposed by other editors, and gain consensus for your desired changes. If you refuse to do this, you'll be blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of CBS Television Studios programs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fear Inside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Nate • (chatter) 18:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former ViacomCBS subsidiaries

A tag has been placed on Category:Former ViacomCBS subsidiaries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

this isn't how categories work...each entity was formerly owned by either CBS Corp or Viacom, it has no relation to the new company

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former ViacomCBS subsidiaries has been nominated for discussion

Category:Former ViacomCBS subsidiaries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spin City. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Original distributor only goes in infobox - see template instructions for that attribute. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at School of Rock (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. You seriously need to stop doing this. You've been told repeatedly that what you are doing is both wrong, and inaccurate. If you don't stop, another trip to WP:ANI is nearly certain. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Project Greenlight, you may be blocked from editing. Bogus credits in category - see WP:CATVER as not mentioned in article and also false Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series by Miramax

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series by Miramax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Hughleys. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Changing categories to ones that fail WP:CATVER in articles. Article on TV series are to reflect that credits at the time, they don't get changed due to mergers and name changes. A wholesale set of changes that end up falsifying information is disruptive. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you plan to rename a category, bring it up for discussion at WP:CfD, make your case for why you think it necessary, and gain consensus to do so, don't just make wholesale potentially disruptive changes without discussing it first. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Entertainment One programs

Hello, ExtraEditing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Entertainment One programs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Should I fix the NBCUniversal Syndication Studios and Universal Television pages. MCA TV was technically the syndicated unit of Universal TV, so it belongs right on the NBCUniversal Syndication Studios, not Universal Television page! --172.127.114.25 (talk) 00:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ViacomCBS has been nominated for discussion

Category:ViacomCBS has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 16:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Could you please add the missing three shows in the Universal Television section on the List of Universal Television programs article please? There are Bust Down, Killing It and Loot (TV series), thank you very much. 82.37.139.114 (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of libraries owned by Lionsgate Studios moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of libraries owned by Lionsgate Studios. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of libraries owned by Lionsgate Studios

Hello, ExtraEditing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of libraries owned by Lionsgate Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]