User talk:Explosive Ezio

Welcome!

Hello, Explosive Ezio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draftspace

Hi. I recently moved an article you created into the draftspace at Draft:Tempi Duri Records. I have conducted this move as your article needs some improvement before being placed in the mainspace; most importantly, you should add more references, as your article only cites on. I highly recommend you read the tips listed at WP:MFA. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy Zerbi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rudy Zerbi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pascal Nègre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pascal Nègre, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Atlantic306. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,but but you could also not delete it, I worked on it a long time Explosive Ezio (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- It's still in the page history but needs references, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gué Pequeno

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions to Gué Pequeno, but they contain a ton of errors. Please review the Manual of Style. Headers should be in sentence case, verb tense generally needs to be past, and album and song titles need to be punctuated appropriately.

In addition, I'm not seeing any sources other than a couple of youtube links. Where are you getting your information?

Using the preview function will also ensure you don't leave a page with damaged formatting (right now the page contains a destroyed table).

Unless these issues are fixed - and you need to be the one to do the cleanup work, please - your edits may well be removed, since at present they do not improve the article.

If I can help with anything, please let me know. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have been active recently, and I would appreciate a response as to whether you intend to fix the many issues with your contributions to this article. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Medeline for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medeline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medeline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 17:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudy Zerbi (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rudy Zerbi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rudy Zerbi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Explosive Ezio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tempi Duri Records

Hello, Explosive Ezio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tempi Duri Records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pascal Nègre

Hello, Explosive Ezio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pascal Nègre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rudy Zerbi concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rudy Zerbi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rudy Zerbi

Hello, Explosive Ezio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rudy Zerbi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]