User talk:Explicit/Archive 13

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Explicit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Image request

Would like some feedback per earlier request. Thanks. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, looking at both the image and the discussion on the article's talk page, it seems that this particular is in violation of the NFCC policy. I don't think anyone argued that the event itself was not significant, but they did argue that the use of this non-free image did not increase the understanding of the readers' of the topic. Of all the editors who took part of the discussion, the only support for its inclusion was by the editor SusanLesch. In this instance, there are two instances of interpretation of the policy, yours and Tbhotch's. Consensus agreed with Tbhotch's analysis, so restoration of the file doesn't really seem like the greatest idea. — ξ ^xplicit 19:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Note that I have no problem with a consensus, even a bare minimum one like here, but the premises and substance for the the consensus seems to have been seriously flawed. As the list of 7 reasons (above link) used by Tbhotch and a few others explains, they all lacked support. Tbhotch relied on NFCC #8, stating "I, as a reader (and I bet that all readers will agree), only see two men shaking their hands. In any moment I feel my understanding of The Social Network increase just because they met each other."

So the end result was that the tagger simply used his personal opinion to prove that the image did not "significantly increase" his understanding, and then threw in some erroneous comments and sarcasm, to support it. Anyone not knowledgeable about or interested in an event could likewise say that this picture of two men shaking hands or this photo of a man stepping off a ladder, could have just as easily been described with words. Since you deleted the image, are you saying in effect that a consensus of 3 to 2 is enough to delete an image, even when that consensus was based on seemingly faulty premises? --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

There's a big difference between the two images you linked and the image that I deleted—the latter was a non-free image, while the former are images that are freely licensed. The goal of Wikipedia is to use as much free content as possible, whether it be by the use of text or freely licensed files, which is why NFCC is strict. This is explained in depth at WP:NFC#Explanation of policy and guidelines. I didn't take headcount of the discussion, I weighed the strength of the arguments and made my decision based on that; the sarcasm is easily ignorable. I didn't anything faulty with the discussion or the consensus. — ξ ^xplicit 21:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Pylon

Was this article perchance related to Salina High School Central? If so, the content might be of use to me either in the article about the school (if it refers to the part of the building known as The Pylon) or the article I am looking to create about the student newspaper at the school (also called The Pylon). In that event, is it possible you could userify the content to a new subpage of my Ks0stm userpage? Thanks in advance, --Ks1stm (talk) ^{[alternative account of Ks0stm]} 20:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The article was about "a 110 meter steel lattice tower located in Gateshead, England". I don't think this was related to Salina High School Central. — ξ ^xplicit 20:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Mmk, thank you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 22:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Please userify Fresh'n

Thanks, Fifelfoo (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, can be found at User:Fifelfoo/Fresh'n. — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks. Having reviewed the article, and WP:PROD, and noting that my talk page was not notified to my memory, (my being the primary contributor); I would like the article undeleted. I would recreate the article, but that would mean that the history would disappear. The article contains a notability statement, being cited in a major documentary on advertising culture by John Pilger, a noted documentary director. Stage 3 of the PROD process advises that articles may be undeleted. Stage 4 of the nomination process advises contacting significant contributors. Had I been notified I would have objected. Many thanks for your work. Fifelfoo (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I've moved the page back into the article namespace at Fresh'n, though that didn't require an admin to do it. — ξ ^xplicit 22:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Restoration of Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp

Hey Explicit:

I noticed you deleted the company page Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp for not being notable. While not an active Wikipedia user, I've been around Wikipedia long enough to know this was a danger with a new page, but felt this one should count as it is a fast growing, and well-funded, start up that has generated a decent amount of media coverage and I tried to document that on the page. What, if anything, could be done to reinstate the page?

Best,

Tyrsdomain (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Just a simple request, which I took this message as. The article has been restored. — ξ ^xplicit 00:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you much!

Tyrsdomain (talk) 18:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Request for a 'redirect'

Hello there, Explicit, regarding your deletion of Daniel Joseph Sheehan, the reason being understood in principle, however as I the original author was not informed at the outset of the intended deletion on my talk page, I was unable to ask for a "Redirect" as was decided in the case of his brother Martin Joseph Sheehan, to their father D. D. Sheehan. Can you arrange this, or whom should I post my request to? Thank you for your help. Greetings, Osioni (talk) 09:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, I restored the contents and redirected the article to D. D. Sheehan. — ξ ^xplicit 22:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks !! Osioni (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

what — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazordude (talk • contribs) 22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping out, take care! AJona1992 (talk) 14:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

File:SimonPoelmanIn1988.jpg

Why are several attempts failing to put the image back after you deleted it? Or has my latest attempt succeeded? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=SimonPoelmanIn1988.jpg (RolfP (talk) 01:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC))

In your first attempt, you didn't provide a proper license tag, so it was deleted on that basis. On your second attempt, you didn't upload a file at all, so that was deleted as an empty file. If you hold the copyright to the image, you can license the image under the license of your choosing. A full of free licenses can be found here. — ξ ^xplicit 21:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Eve logo gold3 small.jpg

Hi Explicit. Would you mind explaining what happened with File:Eve logo gold3 small.jpg, and especially why you didn't even attempt to notify me about it? Thanks.
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 01:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, after spending a good amount of time running down what happened here, I've finally figured it out. I uploaded this image and used it on Solar Dynamics Observatory. User:Hugahoody just recently uploaded an improved version of the graphic (File:EVE logo.png) and then replaced this file with his own.

My only real concern here is the lack of notification, and the lack of a timely reply to my query. Since it appears that this is not an isolated incident (based on User:Ipigott's complaint below), I'm contemplating taking this whole issue to WP:ANI. Regardless of whether or not I do that, I certainly don't appreciate all the trouble that you've caused, here. A bit more care in what you were doing could have easily avoided all of this.
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 15:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm assuming you missed it, but at the very top of my user talk page it states: Explicit's activity on Wikipedia will be at an all time low for the following 15 weeks (thanks to school). Please do not expect timely responses. There are several other venues to ask for deletions, undeletions, protections, blocks, etc. That should explain my untimely response. As for the notifications, that's not the responsibility of the deleting admin, that would be the work of the tagger, in this case being Hugahoody. The user who tagged the file for deletion can leave a courtesy notice, but notification is not mandatory. I, among most users, do notify the uploader when tagging a file for deletion. Perhaps discussing the issue with Hugahoody and explaining that it would be courteous and beneficial to do the same could encourage them to notify users from now on. — ξ ^xplicit 21:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Kinneksbond.JPG

Hello Explicit. I am writing to you here first of all because I spent a considerable amount of time and trouble trying to implement the Fair Use procedures for this image and secondly because I can see no reason under F7 why the image should be deleted immedately without prior notification. As you probably know, there have recently been extensive discussions about FOP in Luxembourg but unfortunately without any solution. For this reason, after lengthy exchanges with user Jameslwoodward on Commons and user talk:Elekhh on Wikipedia, I thought I should try to justify Fair Use on this image of a recently built cultural centre in Luxembourg. It certainly seems to me to be justifiable as the architecture is innovative and in my opinion deserves representation in the form of a photograph. So perhaps you could be more explicit on why it was removed. Finally, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the deletion only appeared on my log over the past hour or so, i.e. some 10 hours after it took place. In the meantime I have posted a request on User talk:Jameslwoodward which I could perhaps have avoided if I had known beforehand that you were behind the deletion. Hope we can sort all this out to avoid further confusion and frustration. - Ipigott (talk) 10:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I have spent the last hour or so trying to get to the bottom of this. If the wrong tag was used in connection with my image, it is not surprising. Only after extensive searching (based on the possibiliity that the tag was the problem) did I find {{Non-free architectural work}} which would seem to be the right one to use. As I have explained on User talk:Jameslwoodward, I could find no guidance on Wikipedia as to how an image file on architecture should be uploaded. Perhaps you could help me out in my next attempt at uploading the image without the risk of further deletion. - Ipigott (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

HELLO! I'm not here because you deleted an article; I'm here because you have deleted a hell of a lot of articles. Please explain your every deletion. If there aren't enough hours in the day for all the deletion that you feel obliged to do plus all the explanations, nominate more people to RfA so they can join you. (Because, after all, brand new administrators just love deleting stuff.) I await your reply to Ipigott's question with keen interest. -- Hoary (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

@Ipigott: For the notification issue, the file was automatically tagged with {{AutoReplaceable fair use buildings}} when you uploaded the image—hence, you didn't get a notification—presumably because you chose a replaceable fair use license. I wasn't aware that Luxembourg didn't have FOP, so that part is definitely a mistake on my part; I've restored the file. However, you're right that you didn't pick the best license, {{Non-free 3D art}} was technically incorrect as it's an image of architecture, not 3D art. The deletion not showing up on your watchlist until ten hours later... that seems to be a server issue, which is beyond the control of administrators.

@Hoary: I'm pretty sure all my deletions have a rationale based directly on policy, from expired prods to speedy deletions of redirects under G8 and so on. I fail to see exactly what's missing. I always explain my deletions if questions are asked, surely my talk page show this. I don't and have never felt obliged to perform all these actions, this is all volunteer work after all. — ξ ^xplicit 21:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Although many of the people who edit WP have very limited attention-spans or seem to be plain stupid, Ipigott doesn't appear to be among these (and neither do you). He writes: I have spent the last hour or so trying to get to the bottom of this. I think he means it. But let's suppose that irritation made him exaggerate, and that if he'd timed it more carefully and subtracted the time he spent pouring himself a cuppa, emailing a friend to say that editing Wikipedia was a mug's game, etc, he spent a mere 20 minutes. Even that would be far longer than the time you'd have needed to spend telling him what the problem was. So, a higher explanation-to-deletion ratio, please. If that means that there aren't enough deletions, then let's have some more people made admins. (Do you have any suggestions?) -- Hoary (talk) 04:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Glad this has finally been sorted out. It all goes to show, I think, that the whole procedure for uploading Free Use images on the EN Wikipedia needs serious attention with a view to improvement and more "userfriendliness". The procedure for images of buildings seems particularly opaque but now I at least have one example in connection with Luxembourg (which, by the way, has no case history of copyright infringements relating to photos of buildings but only to those of outdoor sculptures). As for the tag which was attached to the original filing of Kinneksbond.JPG, to the best of my knowledge I did not add the autoreplaceable tag but when it appeared I noticed that it said explicitly "Do not remove this tag" - so I left it. From these discussions, it looks as if I should have removed it anyway. There was however another tag which unfortunately went unnoticed. I actually used File:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg as a kind of model, the rest was a result of the uploading process. I had less problems dealing with Fair Use images of paintings as the procedure and explanations here are much easier to follow. - Ipigott (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Let's get this issue back up

Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved. The deletion and move log for this page are provided here for convenience: 23:34, 9 January 2011 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Issue6 final small.pdf" ‎ (Deleted because "F4: Lack of licensing information". using TW)

So how do we get this file uploaded again? And what kind of copyright are you looking for? It's a high school newspaper to which I used to be the Editor-in-Chief when that issue was created....

-Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahst12 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not upload it again, if only for two reasons, each of which is sufficient: (1) it's over five megabytes; (2) it's a PDF. But those are only two of the reasons. There are probably more besides. -- Hoary (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File Deletion

Moved from File:SpartanLogo.jpg
Hey Explicit I am not sure exactly why the image was deleted but I would like to correct it. Can you please guide me on how to restore that image to the appropriate page. You left no message on my talk page so I assume you added this to your watchlist? Thank you Johnart111 (talk) 02:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

For your amusement

When you deleted the unlicensed file File:Shiva.jpg from the English Wikipedia, the article Religious image automatically switched to the picture on Commons. The result was unexpected. No action needed on your part, I've fixed it now. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Doom Construction Kit cover.jpg

Please revert deletion of File:Doom Construction Kit cover.jpg and place non-free use rationale template on it. It is used on Doom WAD article. SiPlus (talk) 10:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

And, revert all images you deleted due to F4 and put non-free use rationale on them. SiPlus (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Explicit, I've just revisited the Playtop article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lpashley/Playtop to find that the images I uploaded have been deleted. I have included a non-free rationale for all of them but for some reason you've deleted them, I would be very grateful if you could get back to me with any help or assistance so that I understand why this has happened.

Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Lpashley (talk) 16:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

restoring Michael Koffler page

Hello Explicit, I'm writing about your deletion of the Michael Koffler page. I understand your concerns re: notability, but in the New York education world (and beyond), he's a notable and somewhat controversial person as someone who has started all these private schools, many of them for children with autism, learning disabilities, etc. Someone else had already put up that article, but I just started putting up Wikipedia articles about some of the schools, and had linked to the article about him, and was planning on updating it when I get the time, so I think it would be good to restore it to give readers that information. Thanks. - Charles3395 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles3395 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Article You Deleted

I saw a page that you had deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Tvedtnes&action=history

According to you, the basis for this deletion had much to do with the possible controversy surrounding the individual, yet this is a limitation on free speech, among other things I could certainly cite. There are no restrictions on other controversial individuals such as Jeremiah Wright, or Muʿammar al-Qaḏḏāfī, and the list goes on and on. Please explain your reasoning and most importantly why you single out an individual. This to me show a bit of prejudice and is most certainly unfair. If we cannot resolve this I can and most certainly will take this to higher levels and have you dealt with as an editor on Wikipedia. Awaiting your response.......

Regards,

Very Concerned Reader —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.246.98 (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Here are the guidelines for deletion as outlined by wikipedia. Nowhere in here does it state anything about "controversial" people or subjects. You need to learn them and respect them:

Reasons for deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion Policy shortcut: WP:DEL#REASON

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):

   * Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's non-free content criteria
   * Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish
   * Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
   * Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate)
   * Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)
   * Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
   * Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
   * Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons
   * Redundant or otherwise useless templates
   * Categories representing overcategorization
   * Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the Non-free policy
   * Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace.
   * Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.246.98 (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Why did you delete the Valve Recordings article? Is the article available anywhere? Digitallabrat (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)digitallabrat

Simone Rota

I'm the creator of this article and i did not received any message. But the player is playing in professional league Serie C2 and also played in Italian Serie C1. Matthew_hk t c 18:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Romanian Medical Association of America

Why did you delete the Romanian Medical Association of America page? I just found out it's not there anymore... — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Heart of a Hero (talk • contribs) 18:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Heat-ray 2005.jpg

May I know where File:Heat-ray 2005.jpg comes from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyperSonic X (talk • contribs) 10:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

copyright File:Sage_Salzer.jpg.

I hereby affirm that I, Sage Salzer the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sage_Salzer.jpg.

I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0".

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Sage Salzer, creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright.

23 March 2010 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbrazda (talk • contribs) 21:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pitbull - M.IA.M.I..jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pitbull - M.IA.M.I..jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Removed article on Hallfield Preparatory school Edgbaston

Hi, before I express the reasons why I believe a page for Hallfield should be allowed, allow me to first express my gratitude for the work that you and many others put in to make wikipedia what it is today. A while back you removed an article I made about Hallfield school in the basis that prep schools should be treated no differently to primary schools. I created the article not to emphasis any superiority, but merely as a homage to the rich tradition of Hallfield. I noticed other prep schools such as The Dragon and Amesbury school (to name but a few) have pages dedicated to them, and I was wondering why you feel Hallfield does not deserve this. The school hosted President Clinton, when he landed in Birmingham for the G8 summit, and it sends its pupils to the top schools in the midlands year in year out without fail. Kindest regards, Cameron Fraser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcamo1990 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on May 6, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 6, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 20:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Aaliyah (1979-2001) was an American recording artist, actress and model. At age 12, Aaliyah signed with Jive Records and Blackground Records by her uncle, Barry Hankerson. He introduced her to R. Kelly, who became her mentor, as well as lead songwriter and producer of her debut album, Age Ain't Nothing but a Number. The album sold three million copies in the United States and was certified double platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America. After facing allegations of an illegal marriage with Kelly, Aaliyah ended her contract with Jive and signed to Atlantic Records. Aaliyah worked with record producers Timbaland and Missy Elliott for her second album, One in a Million; it sold 3.7 million copies in the United States and over eight million copies worldwide. In 2000, Aaliyah appeared in her first major film, Romeo Must Die. After completing Romeo Must Die, Aaliyah filmed her part in Queen of the Damned. She released her third and final album, Aaliyah, in July 2001. On August 25, 2001, Aaliyah and eight others were killed in an airplane crash in The Bahamas after filming the music video for the single "Rock the Boat". Since then, Aaliyah's music has achieved commercial success with several posthumous releases. She has been credited for helping redefine R&B and hip hop, earning her the nickname "Princess of R&B". (more...)

Suggestion

Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Wikipedia. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{User:Invest in knowledge/mdx}} to your userpage. Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of Page - Bruno A. Barreiro

Explicit:

My name is Bruno A. Barreiro, I am a County Commissioner in Miami Dade County, Florida representing District 5. I recently noticed that my page was deleted in Wikipedia by you on November 10, 2010 at 2:21. The reason noted is that it is a, Copyright infringement of http://www.miamidade.gov/district05/about.asp, which is the link to my official Webpage in Miami-Dade County Government Site. Please let me know how this page can be reinstated.

Thank you,

Babjic (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Bruno A. Barreiro County Commissioner District 5 Babjic (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

CYMA_Systems

I was not aware of citing sources on the company page of CYMA_Systems. (Expired PROD, concern was: No sources provided for any components of Recognition section. Has remained unreferenced since late last year.)

I was not made aware of this and I am sorry for the oversight. I would be happy to update and properly cite all reference if I could just get the page restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.191.115.39 (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

E-moneybags

Yo you deleted E-Moneybags page. You should re-make it or re-write it, but I think it was fine before. E was a great rapper who had a great album, and I don't see why you deleted his album too. You can contact me on the vault (the fallout wiki) under the name Power Bonkers. I'll help you if you want it, but I'm kinda frustrated that this page is gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.71.229.165 (talk) 07:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Here's a link

Here's a link to my page and we'll see what we can do. http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/User:Power_Bonkers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.40.224 (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:WikiProject_Environment_Green_vehicle_task_force_participants

Hi,

I recreated Category:WikiProject_Environment_Green_vehicle_task_force_participants. because I think it is a valid category, and I was tired of looking at the red link on my userpage. You had deleted this category because it was created by a banned user. Please let me know if there are issues with this. It was my first attempt at creating a category, so I might have made mistakes. Many thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Well well look who's back. Its good to hear from you. Nah, you didn't miss much, except that no pop music articles were promoted in FAC, a super increase in sockpuppetry, the 2011 VMA page being attacked by jealous Gaga, Britney and Rihanna fans and, well, me being kinda non-chalant about all of these. :P — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry, sounds like fun! I feel so foreign around here and things look like a mess... especially in K-pop related articles, where I plan to work on now. I give up on everything else. — ξ ^xplicit 05:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Actually you are right. When I returned after my accident, things had also changed. There were new rules, guidelines, formattings etc etc. I have actually stopped venturing out of my talk page and out of Madonna and Gaga articles. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

hi

How did you create your talk page? With the border and the images for each sub-page? I see loads of people with this design but I have no idea how to do it lol. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 16:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

It's like decorating your own userpage, except you create a subpage like mine and add all the coding there. Then you just add {{User:Explicit/Userpage}} (except with your username and the name of your subpage instead of mine) at the top of all your userpages you'd like it to show up on, and voila.

— ξ ^xplicit 17:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Okay thanks I'll try it! DId you choose the pictures yourself? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 17:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, they can be found over at Wikimedia Commons in categories like Category:Norro style 1 icons, Category:Notepad icons, etc. It takes some exploring. — ξ ^xplicit 17:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I've clicked on edit on all of your subpages, but I can't see where you have put the codes for the blue border and sub-page pictures? This is really confusing me lol. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 15:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

All the code is here: User:Explicit/Userpage. It should all be visible if you hit the edit button on that subpage. — ξ ^xplicit 19:33, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Cornerstone logo.png

Hi. So I work at Cornerstone Fellowship and have the authority to upload its logo unto wikipedia. Can you undelete the logo, or tell me how to upload it with the proper license? --Stephen Bolin ^talk 04:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. If Cornerstone Fellowship would like to release the logo in under a suitable free license, could you have the copyright owner of the graphic (presumably the organization or the graphic artist) email permissions-en@wikimedia.org to verify this? Make sure to include the URL to the deleted file and state which specific license the copyright owner releases it under; it should be sorted out shortly after. — ξ ^xplicit 06:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you. Stephen Bolin ^talk 07:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome Back

I just noticed you back at WP:PUF. Good to see you back around. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I had a nice break, but I'm ready to get back into editing.

— ξ ^xplicit 00:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Simply a friendly greeting

SwisterTwister has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I hope you enjoy this cookie as a friendly greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 02:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Appreciate the message. — ξ ^xplicit 02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Texicon

I noticed that you deleted the Texicon page. I was attempting to create it (I guess for the second time) as I had forgotten that I had created one already.

The note says that you deleted the page because it was a non-notable convention. I would argue that this is not true. There are no Table Top Gaming conventions in Texas. Moreover, there is a lot of discussion occurring about this convention on the web. The organizers seem to be offering a full convention that seems to beginning to be noticed. I would also note that there is a facebook page, that it advertised with Board Game Geek. There are also many blogs discussing it.

Moreover, since there are no other game conventions in this area, I would argue that it is a major convention. Had there been other conventions, then I would say not. A pail of water in the desert is like an ocean.

So, now that I remember trying to create a page. And having done so again by mistake. I would argue that this convention indeed needs to be represented in the list of conventions that occur in the region. I would also note that I did not publish the second one but asked for help and now I can't find it. Did that one get deleted too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.44.25 (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Being the only convention in the area won't exactly be enough for an article on the subject to exist. In order for Texicon to merit inclusion on Wikipedia, it needs to meet the notability guideline. This can be done if you can cite that the convention has received coverage from multiple third-party reliable sources to warrant an article. — ξ ^xplicit 06:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for the info. All the best, RS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radicalsingularity (talk • contribs) 14:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

File:KeithGustinperforming.png

Hello, you deleted this file and it is unclear to me why it was deleted. Could you please tell me why? Tom US A 22:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

It was deleted because, at the upload form, you indicated that the file was tagged with a non-free license. Since the subject in the picture is an active, living person, it was automatically tagged as {{AutoReplaceable fair use people}}, indicating that a freely licensed image of the person exists or can be created. So, it was deleted in line with the third point under F7 of our speedy deletion policy after being tagged for two days. Hope that clears things up. — ξ ^xplicit 23:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

OK. I'll try uploading a fair use image. Tom US A 19:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

...That's why it was deleted in the first place. Uploading a fair use image of a living person violates the first point of the non-free content criteria. Only freely licensed images, like those released under the public domain or under a Creative Commons, are allowed for living individuals. — ξ ^xplicit 21:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-12-ECHL-map.gif‎

I seem to have inadvertently created and then re-created this page while attempting to add categories. My apologies. Cjmclark ^(Contact) 23:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

No worries. HotCat should have some sort of warning when editing pages where the image is hosted on Commons... — ξ ^xplicit 23:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Alexander Keith's Dark Ale.jpg

This picture I took was deleted and no rational was given. I did not make any license changes because I was waiting for a response from the person who initially nominated it but it never came. PeRshGo (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The rationale was in the nomination. Yes, the actual picture you took was years. The problem lied on the artwork on the can and on the glass, as they are copyrighted works which can not be freely licensed. It was an unacceptable form of a derivative work. — ξ ^xplicit 05:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

'Thirteen (album)' move - thanks

Thanks for getting my proposed move of 'Thirteen (album)' to 'Thirteen (Teenage Fanclub album)' taken care of. Have a great day!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem at all. — ξ ^xplicit 18:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

David Ramadan

You left a msg 'very spam-like wording' when you reverted my additions out of the David Ramadan page. The page as I found it was essentially a puff piece self promotion of a controversial politician. I've provided no self promotion to it, in fact I added the controversy sections because issues are being raised, both locally and nationally concerning this individual and have referenced it with what i believe to be valid 3rd party cites as compared to the self citing one of the page editors tries to restrict it too.

I would agree that my additions are controversial, but then again so is the subject. There has been no discussion, and that is probably because the subject person of the bio is using a paid media consultant to maintain it to his own desire and it would be a stretch to expect casual viewers (the presumed audience) to contribute where the 'active' interested parties are more consumed by the blogs relating to the subject. I certainly don't intend to fill this with blog cites or use it for an 'attack'. However, verifiable hypocritical political positions, blowing smoke, and consistent stonewalling of valid questions are a characteristic that should be addressed, more so when the subject (it is a bio) is clearly using self cites throughout picturing himself as as he wishes to be pictured. I am a noob to Wikipedia, so If you can suggest how I can address your concerns without compromising the subject matter (controversies and honesty) I'll do my best to comply. My concern is that the other editor seems dedicated to removing changes rather than addressing and resolving issues. I don't intend to recruit ersatz editors to support my view since I don't have a dog in the political fight, but given what I've seen in the blogs, the subject of this page has no problem financing paid agents to accomplishing his ends. Any suggestions for my compliance to Wikipedia's needs here would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zparqi (talk • contribs) 08:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

There were very big problems with the text you added. You added lines like Allegiance IS A MAJOR CONCERN regarding a candidate professing to be a ‘proud American living the American Dream” now trying to become a member of the Virginia House of Delegates who would make our laws and Another not so unbiased source adds to the complexity of the controversy surrounding Mr. Ramadam, by contributing a backhanded defense article David “Go GOP” Ramadan Fails To Make Himself Less Repulsive. Wikipedia articles are to be written in a neutral point of view, and these lines are far from it. Also, "the subject person of the bio is using a paid media consultant to maintain it to his own desire" is quite a claim. Is there any evidence backing up this claim, or are there any accounts/IP addresses which seem to be editing in such a style? Although there is no policy forbidding such editing, it does become a problem when conflicts of interests arise. The first step to take would be to attempt to communicate with that editor on their talk page and go from there. — ξ ^xplicit 18:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Chapter 27 screenshot.jpg

Why did you delete that image? Here there isn't a consensus to remove it.--Earthh (talk) 09:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussions are closed based on the weight of the arguments, not the head count of keeps versus deletes. The initiator of the discussion argued that the screenshot did not have any contextual significance as required by the non-free content criteria, as it does not increase the readers' understanding of the article. As Bkell also pointed out, the poster does a fine job at showing that Jared Leto gained weight for the role, which was the purpose of this image. Taking these points into account, the screenshot didn't seem beneficial in keeping around. — ξ ^xplicit 18:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:Galassi#Hermann Hauser

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Galassi#Hermann Hauser. Trevj (talk) 22:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Chan45.jpg

You are threatening the pages associated with this file stating that they have been uploaded before, but negate to prove it with links. I clearly stated in all of the files that I myself took the pictures with the person in question. You are deleting them just because they held the camera!!! Are you serious? As an agent working for the person I can't upload they're self taken picture(s) even though I correctly coded it? Unbelievable!! Mikepellerin (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

I've left a reply at the discussion, please see the instructions I left there to clear up the issue. — ξ ^xplicit 22:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Fiona_Bruce.jpg

This file and the others I tagged for speedy today are obviously screen caps from copyright sources. Why are they not deletable as copyvios? They also clearly fail the NFCC as all the individuals are alive and free images could be obtained. Seems like a no-brainer to me. – ukexpat (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:CSD#F9 reads: Obviously non-free images [...] that are not claimed by the uploader to be fair use. All the images you tagged are licensed with {{Non-free television screenshot}}, so they automatically don't meet F9 at all. If they were tagged as being released under the public domain, for example, when they are clearly copyrighted screenshots, then they would be eligible for deletion under F9. You're right to point out that they do fail NFCC, and all the files were already tagged with {{di-replaceable fair use}} a few hours before your speedy deletion requests. They'll be deleted two days after they were tagged. — ξ ^xplicit 02:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Kanye West proposal

Hello. I'm proposing a WikiProject Kanye West at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Kanye West. Would you mind taking the time to vote there? Put your name in the Support section if you think he deserves one.

Kanyewest1123 (talk) 08:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Explicitboy, this somehow seems like a sock. The quacking by creating a WikiProject proposal in his/her first edit somehow gives it away. Can you check it? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Thought the same thing. Seems off that this would be his first priority after creating his account.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 12:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

It is quite fishy, but CheckUser can't be used solely used for this reason. Would either of you have an idea of whose alternate account this possibly might belong to? That would help. — ξ ^xplicit 21:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Well, maybe the user edited with an IP previously, and created the account so he or she could get the WikiProject created. Or maybe it's just someone's WP:CLEANSTART. Either way, the user doesn't seem to be disruptive in any way, and seems to just want to help. — Status {^talk_contribs 07:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Giant Bomb images - File:GiantBombIPhone.jpg & File:HTBAB2.jpg

Can I get some specifics on the two images you deleted on Giant Bomb in reference to F7. I need to know whether the images' uploaders' mistakes were something that can be rectified by uploading the images again with a different fair-use tag (providing I can find them) or whether there's a reason in which they're not suitable for the article and can't be reuploaded. Thanks. --FLStyle (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Both files were tagged with {{di-replaceable fair use}}. They were screenshots of staff (from what I can get from the captions, anyways) and specifically failed the first point of the non-free content criteria. I don't think a different fair use rationale would have justified their inclusion. — ξ ^xplicit 22:07, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of the article of Naeem Mohaiemen

Hi Explicit, I tried created an article today for "Naeem Mohaiemen". I noticed the wiki message saying a page with this title has previously been deleted by you. So, here I am. You mentioned "Non notable author. Subject himself seems to have written the article" as concern.

He is a modern historian and contemporary artist renowned especially among the Bangladeshi community worldwide. I am now starting to write something on him, so thought I should let you know. You are more than welcome to review my writings and please feel free to advise me on improving it. I will be gradually adding references.

Thanks for your understanding. Let me know if you have any comments.

Regards, Nawsher (talk) 16:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Nawsher

The Pets - deleted page on the basis of no national radio play

Greetings,

I am a member of The Pets music group from Steinbach, Manitoba. I would like to request the reactivation of our The Pets Wikipedia page. It appears that anonymity is required (24.150.19.83 (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)) so I will not post my name here.

Surprisingly, we received quite a bit of national and international radio play initially. We charted in top 10 college charts in Canada, USA, Belgium, and other countries as well. I remember being quite excited by all of the press that we were generating worldwide. We were released on major music magazine Beikoku Ongaka (literally Foreigner Music - "in Japan") on a compilation CD with other indie acts from around the world. We had worldwide distribution and I still receive royalty checks from publishing and sales every year from Endearing Records and Publishing.

I was hoping you would reconsider your decision to delete our band account. I know there has been no notable recent activity, but that is true of many bands found on Wikipedia. It would mean a lot to myself and others in the band to see our band restored on Wikipedia.

Best regards,

CP 24.150.19.83 (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However, I advise you and the other band members to review our conflict of interest guideline. Please be aware that the article may be re-deleted through the articles for deletion process if notability is not shown. — ξ ^xplicit 02:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nelly - Brass Knuckles.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nelly - Brass Knuckles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I removed the speedy deletion template, the article was using File:Brassknucklesalbumcover.jpg, which is significantly larger. I thought the smaller file was better suited as the fair use image to be used.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Revdelete

...is all that is needed to complete the whacking of Grawp's sock.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Done. — ξ ^xplicit 03:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hate to bother you more, but the edit summaries of both revisions in this (and the content of the sock's edit) need to be masked as well, as does the edit summaries of all of my reverts.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Mmkay, seems like I got them all now. — ξ ^xplicit 03:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Well, looks like we have another sock to whack.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

...He came back way too quickly. I hope you don't mind the three-hour semi-protection. Off to clean up the rest. — ξ ^xplicit 03:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Yep. Final admin task is to remove Grawp's edit summaries. That'll finish him for tonight.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Done and done. Grawp sure knows how to waste administrators' time. — ξ ^xplicit 03:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of The Horrible Crowes page

The Page for The Horrible Crowes should be restored, the band has their first record coming out on Spetember 6th, 2011, and it is going to be released on Side One Dummy records, their doesn't seem to be much reason for the band still not having a page, seeing as it is the side project of a relatively well known songwriter and the record is certain to debut on the Billboard 200 charts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.32.213 (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean The Horrible Crowes? The page was deleted because the creator of the article blanked the page. If this IP belongs to Bono360 (talk · contribs), please login and post here so I can verify that you are requesting undeletion. — ξ ^xplicit 19:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Australian Holographics

I don't understand your comment about why the deletion suggestion was removed from teh above article. I would be grateful if you would clarify this. Thanks Epzcaw (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

The article was previously deleted and then restored as a result of consensus made at this DRV. I declined the prod as my action could have possibly constituted as wheel warring, even more so since the undeletion took place because of the DRV. Hope that clears things up. If you think a full discussion would gather a consensus of deleting the article, you're free to nominate the page for deletion at WP:AFD. — ξ ^xplicit 18:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't feel that strongly about it either way. Still no references but there you are. Epzcaw (talk) 19:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Old versions

Hey Explicit, can you delete the old versions of File:Madonna 4 Minutes Coverart.png? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Done. — ξ ^xplicit 19:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Lovestruck :Senior Year

Just an FYI... FantageJapanRox (talk · contribs) left you a personal message on the talk page of the deleted article asking you about the deletion. I deleted the talk page since it was an orphaned talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I'll drop by the user's talk page shortly. — ξ ^xplicit 18:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

graveman

Expired PROD, concern was: No references on four years. Non-notable software, now abandoned. I currently use this software (no matters) and is old, you are right, notable? there are few GUI burn linux programs therefore there are several broken links in wiki and recently I noted some active Linux distributions still use graveman or switch to it, i had to read wikipedia graveman in spanish or french maybe delete them too still live — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfbar1 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm only administrator here on the English Wikipedia. If deletion is merited outside of this specific project, that would require proposed deletion in both separate Wikipedias. — ξ ^xplicit 20:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

MxBB Portal deletion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MxBB_Portal

This article could just be renamed to wiki/Mx-Publisher as states on the old project website ( http://web.archive.org/web/20080203230410/http://www.mx-system.com/ )the project has been renamed and then moved and then this wiki page fogot. Since this is a phpBB based CMS the wiki page whould not be as written like a user manual/advertising page but should be sectioned as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhpBB even if the main and secondary projects of this CMS will remain hosted only on sourceforge network (for example: http://mxpcms.sourceforge.net/ ) FlorinCB (talk) 04:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Clan Blue Feather device deletion

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=File%3AClan+Blue+Feather+device.JPG

This was created specifically for common use by the author. What do I have to do to prevent its deletion? Esprix (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

The file was deleted because, at the upload form, you indicated that the image could be used for either "non-commercial use only", "non-derivative use" or "used with permission". Because of this, this automatically made the file eligible for deletion under F3 of the speedy deletion criteria. What license exactly did the copyright holder release this image under? — ξ ^xplicit 20:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

He just said "anybody can use it, just don't make money off of it." Esprix (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Well, then there's the problem. If an image is released under a free license, it must be allowed to use it for commercial purposes. Otherwise, it will be (and was) deleted under F3. — ξ ^xplicit 18:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused - is Wikipedia somehow making money off of it? Esprix (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not make money from these images. From WP:IUP#Free licenses, the commercial use of images is to: ...both to keep Wikipedia's own legal status secure as well as to allow for as much re-use of Wikipedia content as possible. — ξ ^xplicit 21:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Please hold...

I'm working on moving a bunch of the images at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_September_7 to Commons. Could you hold off a day or so before deleting the rest so that I can move the remaining ones I'd like to? Thanks. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Will do. Would you be okay if images like File:12thtfw.gif were deleted, when there are replacement images in use like File:12th Flying Training Wing.png? — ξ ^xplicit 19:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

If there's already a replacement, sure. Also, go right ahead with the census images; I see no value in transferring them to Commons. I'll let you know when I'm done with the ones I want to move. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Done, delete away. Now I'll just start working on the next seven days of nominations... –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, will get to it. — ξ ^xplicit 20:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Census image deletions

I see you deleted several of my census images "per discussion", but I see no discussion or a notification of me, the person who uploaded them. The most appropriate thing to do would be to move them to commons, if they are no longer used as references in the articles. You never confirmed if they were truly orphaned, the article Edward S. Curtis now has a red link in the references and in the timeline that led to the deleted image. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

The nominator of all those images was Fastily (talk · contribs), so I would suggest contacting him in regards to the lack of notifications. They were all listed in Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 7 and not one editor opposed their deletion, so they were deleted by default. Additionally, the description pages did list all the images as not being displayed in any articles, and pipe-linking images does not change the fact they are orphaned. If you'd like, you can list all the images that were being used in references—I'll restore them and move them to Commons. — ξ ^xplicit 00:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I am Jivesh. I think we have talked before. If no, maybe you blocked me in 2009 when i was new here and obviously doing things i did not know were wrong. I was wondering if you comment on PRs? Jivesh 1205 (talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 05:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

According to your block log, I never blocked you. I'm not sure if we've interacted before, that's anyone's guess, really... Anywho, I'll try to give them a look if I have time. — ξ ^xplicit 18:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I took you for User:Ericorbit. Sorry. Anyway, the article is "Best Thing I Never Had". Already opened a PR. Jivesh 1205 (talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 19:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

LMFAO

Talk:LMFAO_(group)#Move. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I really have no opinion on the move, I declined the speedy mostly on procedural grounds. — ξ ^xplicit 04:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

What You See Is What You Get (song) is a non-controversial one, though. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Yup, taken care of. — ξ ^xplicit 05:11, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

UCEA - Levels.png

Image is USG, public. http://www.slideshare.net/ablumen/andy-blumenthal-presents-usercentric-enterprise-architecture-1605994 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairedits (talk • contribs) 02:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Old Amsterdam

Please userfy article at User:Lexein/Old Amsterdam and Talk at User talk:Lexein/Old Amsterdam - I missed the prod. Thanks. --Lexein (talk) 14:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Done, though there was no talk page to restore. — ξ ^xplicit 19:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

O Broadcast System

As the administrator who acted on the expired PROD of O Broadcasting System I thought you might be interested in examining Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Broadcasting System and giving your viewpoint regarding this newly re-created article. Thank you for your time Hasteur (talk) 20:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

If there's one thing worth pointing out, it's that you'll unlikely find any sources in English, considering this is a South Korean television network. I did find these two articles—both in Korean—regarding its launch in 2007... but not much else. — ξ ^xplicit 22:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Unlinking bad

Hi, I reverted two of your redlink unlinks before I realised you were an administrator. Some of those redlinks resulted from a mass deletion concerning a user's questionable editing, see here and here. It's left quite a mess and my intention is to minimise the follow-on damage. I generally think unlinking of accceptable redlinks is harmful to the project, but I have asked for some consensus here before reverting further. -84user (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I became aware of the situation shortly after Marshallsumter the ANI thread and the resulting block. I think I misread something and assumed the topics were synthesis, not what was written in the articles... my mistake. I had no plans to continue the unlinking, so you don't have to worry about that. — ξ ^xplicit 22:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Alqadeer magazine

Hi Explicit, you have deleted an article Alqadeer magazine on September 14. It is about an important student magazine. It is requested to paste the article along with its history. --Khalid Mahmood (talk) 05:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure I understand the request. Do you want a copy of the article and its history or do you want the article restored? — ξ ^xplicit 21:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I request you to restore it.--Khalid Mahmood (talk) 14:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. — ξ ^xplicit 21:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Larry Bock Page deletion

Hello explicit, you deleted my page stating it is copyright infringement but it is not copyright infringement as the Wikipedia page i created is different from the http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/pagrp/LarryBockinfo.html page and we own the other page. i have personal permission from Larry bock to create this page. i respectfully ask you to please restore my page. thank you (frank 21:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC))

The administrator who deleted Larry Bock was Fastily (talk · contribs). If the text was released under a free license, please email OTRS at permissions-en@wikimedia.org with the link to the page in question along with the permission. — ξ ^xplicit 19:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello explicit, Mr Larry bock got UC Berkeley to take down the page in question http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/pagrp/LarryBockinfo.html. i would like a restoration of Larry bock page. I emailed fastily but he did'nt reply and he keeps deleting my talk. thank you frank 22:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank.diaz1994 (talk • contribs)

I went through Fastily's talk page history and noticed that another administrator had replied to your message. Again, if you have permission to use text by the copyright holder, please email OTRS at permissions-en@wikimedia.org with the link to the page in question along with the evidence of permission given by the copyright holder. — ξ ^xplicit 22:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

we got the "copyrighted" page removed and there is no more need to get request permission. frank 23:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank.diaz1994 (talk • contribs)

Deletion of Helena von Schantz

How can I get the Helena von Schantz page I created back, so that I can improve it and resubmit it at a later date? --Michael Goodyear (talk) 09:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I could either move the article into your userspace where you to work on it or I can email you the text that was on the page prior to its deletion. — ξ ^xplicit 19:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

OK Could you move it - thanks!--Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Done, I have moved the article to User:Mgoodyear/Helena von Schantz. Please make sure you address the points raised at the AFD before you initiate a discussion at WP:DRV if you believe all the concerns have been properly addressed. — ξ ^xplicit 18:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks --Michael Goodyear (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

ERIC GRIFFIN

Hello, my name is Eric Griffin.

I have been touring the world in various bands including Murderdolls, Faster Pussycat, Wednesday13, the Genitorturers, The dreaming, and Synical for TEN YEARS and am known internationally.I recently came to Wiki because I wanted to make corrections to the page which was edited by fans over the years. However, you apparently deleted my Wiki page a month ago. For what reason did you do this, and what exactly do I need to do to get up back up, and corrected. I am not very familiar with how this works, but i know my page needs to be up. asap.

Thanks, Eric

Hi there. The article Eric Griffin was proposed for deletion by another editor with the rationale "No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources", which went uncontested for seven days. After that, it was deleted by me. In this case, a simple request to have the page restored will suffice, so I have done so. Please be aware that it may still be nominated for deletion through the articles for deletion process, a consensus-based venue. Also, as the subject of the article, it would be a good idea to read our conflict of interest page. — ξ ^xplicit 19:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Deleting my contributions....

Dear sir,

I´m getting pretty tired of trying to help improving Wikipedia.

I waste too much time trying to do the right thing here. Recently I find perfectly legitimate contributions of albums deleted by you. Album covers are okay to upload at Wikipedia. You know that. Also info about albums. And there was no doubt that the albums you deleted were official ones, released on several labels around the world. You did NOT bother to improve. You preferred to delete useful info for other people.

I don't want to waste more time here. I will report you to the appropriate places and delete all material I have added to Wikipedia.

Get a life.

Metallica1980 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metallica1980 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

The articles were deleted because another editor proposed their deletions because they failed the notability guidelines for albums. These proposed deletions went uncontested for seven days and were routinely deleted. The burden of verifying that the topic is notable lies with the editor(s) interested in having the articles kept, not anyone else. Your petty insults won't lead to anything productive, either. — ξ ^xplicit 00:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia could be a great place to share information. Ever stopped to think that some people might be interested in helping out with info, without being interested in living our lives here to constantly monitor our contributions so that narcissistic administrators/editors don't delete them. If this place is about info, why doesn't the editors spend their time improving pages instead of deleting them? It certainly doesn't motivate "normal" people to contribute. My contributions' accuracy isn't very hard to verify for anyone interested. Unfortunately there's obviously no interest to improve. You and your "editor" friends seem much more interested in removing than improving. May I suggest you get the rest of the info about the band Evil Masquerade deleted as well. At least the albums. There are still 2 left. And those are presented exactly the same way as the other 2 that got deleted after several years online. I tried to delete them for you but unfortunately it couldn't be done. I've already contacted the band and they aren't interested in being at Wikipedia with incomplete material so they prefer to be completely deleted. And I have already spent too much time trying to help out. What's the point? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metallica1980 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Dear xplicit. I still don't understand why you don't delete the rest of Evil Masquerade's discography??? If you consider the 2 albums you removed to be rightfully deleted, then remove the other 2 as well. They must be just as wrong. Otherwise reverse what shouldn't have been deleted. Doesn't make sense.... Metallica1980 (talk) 04:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Because someone has to nominate them for deletion. I can't delete the articles on a whim nor can I delete them because the band has an all-or-nothing stance. — ξ ^xplicit 20:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay I see. I give up now. Let's see if someone else bothers to correct whatever was wrong or suggest the remains to be deleted as well. Metallica1980 (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Rescaled fair use images and the job queue

The reason the number of images in Category:Rescaled fairuse images more than 7 days old is because I null edited the parent category last night before the bot added a thousand images. In doing so, I found some images tagged since 24 and 25 September. In light of this, do you think we should convert the rescaled fair use images to date-based categories like CAT:NS? — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't really see the need. The files will eventually show up in Category:Rescaled fairuse images more than 7 days old, and I personally don't see too much harm in the images waiting a few extra days to have their larger scaled revisions to be deleted. — ξ ^xplicit 21:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File for CSD

Hi, I'm a newly-appointed admin, so I need to be sure that I'm doing the right thing before deletion. Consider File:Phila FLP Wyoming00.png - this has been tagged {{db-author}} by its uploader, but there are two intervening bot edits. Is G7 a valid criterion, or would those bot edits fall outside "the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author"? (there is a better version on commons at File:Phila FLP Wyoming02.jpg but WP:CSD#F8 doen't apply because one is a PNG, the other JPEG). Thanks. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

The file is still eligible for deletion under G7. Bots generally only make edits dealing with maintenance, so they tend to be minor edits that don't contribute enough to be considered substantial. This applies to all bot edits made in any namespace. Belated congrats.

— ξ ^xplicit 19:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Another Black Day (album)

I saw the reason the page was deleted but the band was a real band and the page could have helped each member as we're all working on other projects. I'm Angel Hernandez, the drummer for that band and most of us have branched off into other projects and I was going to update that page with said info. If there is any way at all the band page can be reinstated that would be amazing and greatly appreciated. If there's anything at all I can do on this matter please let me know. Thanks for hearing me out.

Masikus (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

If the band isn't notable, then the album will likely be equally as non-notable. So, the first thing that needs to be done is to verify that the band meets the guideline for notability about bands and musicians. A quick search for information regarding the band seems to be very minimal... a few drive-by mentions, but I'm afraid I can't find anything substantial enough that makes them appear notable. — ξ ^xplicit 20:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Explicit/Archive 13! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

No Labels image deletion

Hi Explicit,

I'm editing the wikipedia page for this organization and I was trying to add an image. You deleted the image for having an improper license. The license has since been changed to CC-BY-SA 2.0. Could you please un-delete the image or allow me to re-upload it? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NoLabels_July18Rally.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Thanks. K28921 (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

I've restored the image and adjusted the license accordingly. Regards. — ξ ^xplicit 21:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Howitzer shelling of Sirte

Please explain to me the reason you deleted the image. The person who nominated it for deletion stated that Free images can be found. Photo doesn't illustrate a historical event. Both of these statements were untrue. There are no, I repeat, no free images of the battle of Sirte. All existing images come from media outlets. The second issue....how is this not a historical event? The fall of the birthplace of Moamar Gaddafi in the civil war, last battle of the war, battle ending the war, and battle during which Gaddafi was killed. Tell me how that is not of historic value? Not to mention the shelling of Sirte was one of the more notable parts of the battle, since the city has now been devasted to ruble because of it, and thus the image was representing that part of the battle. EkoGraf (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Cheetah_Cubs_Lying_on_Rock.jpg

Hi Explicit, Thanks for the delete. I switched things around and wasn't sure if I was suppose to do it or not.Thisandthem (talk) 15:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Question about references and nobility guideline for music

An article I'm contributing to, M.I.B (South Korean group), was tagged about its references and not meeting with nobility guideline for music. Is Allkpop not a good source to use as references? It is the only site that I know that write about Korean music in English. It also says that the article was written like an advertisement. And how far does the articles has to go from one through twelve to meet the guidelines? Thank you. 제이2케이엑스 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

LA-area Meetup: Saturday, November 19

	National Archives Backstage Pass at the Reagan Library
	You are invited to the first-ever backstage pass tour and Wikipedia editathon hosted by the Reagan Presidential Library, in Simi Valley, on Saturday, November 19th! The Reagan Library, home to a real Air Force One and other treasures from American history, will take Wikipedians on a special tour of the grounds and archives, followed by an editathon; free catered lunch provided. Please sign up! Dominic·t 21:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.