User talk:Expertu

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. , SqueakBox 15:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

I see this page is being marked for deletion :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamit_Company

I made a page for this company , just like others already exist in Wikipedia :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutelsat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

I do not see why is this wrong ?

Could you please explain ?

Writing Corporate Pages

Plus : please explain this : " It's a Romanian company, and its page sponsor may be unfamiliar for Wikipedia corporate page style"

Expertu, the article, as you wrote it, was very promotional. If you want to create Wikipedia articles about companies, I suggest you (1) state the facts, without trying to promote the product, (2) provide the basis for creating an article. In order to survive a Vote for deletion the company has to be noteworthy in some way. You can provide evidence that a company is noteworthy many different ways, for instance, by stating how may customers it has, what makes it unique, or what awards it has won.

My vote for Lamit Company is currently delete. As an inclusionist, I would like to change my vote to keep, but could you please take a more friendly tone towards me, and try to add some of the factual details I am requesting? If the company is in business and has more than 1000 customers (or however many), just say so in the article, and that will help people to understand.

For instance, the following statement is factual, and provides a basis for keeping the article: "Lamit company provides satellite Internet service to thousands of customers in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Without Lamit, these customers would have no other economical access to Broadband Internet service."

The following is purely promotional, and will be deleted: "Lamit provides excellent Internet service for less money than all its competitors."

If you stick to the facts, and avoid hype, you're going to get a much better result for your company. Best wishes, Jehochman 07:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

About your words.

I do not have to re-choose my tone towards you.

What you actually said, is wrongfull, and not based on any evidence.

But... What i can do, is learn from the kind explanation you gave me, about corporate pages.

In 1-2 days maximum, i'll rewrite this article.

Thank you for your time and efforts, to make me understand.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lamitco logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lamitco logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepstash (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Expertu/sandbox/Deepstash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Expertu/sandbox/Deepstash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Expertu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepstash (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not make it clear whether Deepstash is a community or an app. There is no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, and the sources in the article don't seem to agree with each other: the commonsensemedia.org review presents it as an app for self improvement, while the therecursive.com interview with the founder talks about curated snippets of information, and sifted.eu talks about "a mobile-first platform where people could connect around ideas-based content", which is a little too jargon-y to make much sense.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepstash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deepstash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deepstash

Hello, Expertu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deepstash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]