User talk:Example99

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @K6ka:. I would like to ask you a clarification about your action, and you are expected to answer. Although there are no entries for @Example99: in the abuse log, is there any evidence suggesting what I am accused of? Example99 (talk) 11:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @331dot:. Because @K6ka: has been inactive since October 10, I pinged you as well. I hope you do not mind. Example99 (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, @331dot:. Now that you have dealt with @Observer1989:, could you also deal with me please? Example99 (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My review of your last request ends my involvement in this matter. You may make another for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is all the evidence I need to present at this time. No user who is here to positively contribute to Wikipedia would ever make such an edit. I recommend you do not ping or directly contact other admins to get their attention. If you want to request an unblock, you know where to find the guide to appealing blocks (since you apparently know where the admin accountability section is). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the evidence and I am sorry for pinging you. Example99 (talk) 07:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i just wanted to test Superhatting Example99 (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

basically it was Wikipedia:IGF Example99 (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Example99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That was just a test edit and I am so sorry! Example99 (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't about a single edit. Your contributions have been generally unproductive and many are disruptive, including at least one edit summary with a personal attack. Right now it seems that the project is better off with you blocked. If you want to be a productive contributor, you will need to tell us how. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Example99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This edit really was intended to be a test edit, but I understand that the page I edited is not a place for test edits. I promise I will not make any test edits, unproductive edits, or disruptive edits to pages other than the Wikipedia sandbox and my sandbox ever again. Plus, I am deleting the sandbox on my talk page, recognizing it as a misuse of the page. Example99 (talk) 08:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This adds nothing meaningful to the prior unblock request. Additionally, below, you indicate you don't plan to edit Wikipedia constructively, only sandboxes. We aren't interested in you doing that. Yamla (talk) 10:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You already have a sandbox

User:Example99/sandbox. You can't make your talk page be one. Zaathras (talk) 18:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked, see User_talk:Example99#March 2023. Example99 (talk) 04:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In effect, I can only edit one page and it's this user talk page. Also, I can't use DISPLAYTITLE because it requires the requested title to resolve to the true one, so I'm stuck... Example99 (talk) 04:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can't archive this discussion with {{hat}} and {{hab}}. Example99 (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In conclusion, I'm stuck with making this an unofficial sandbox.

So, I have to archive it.

I could use templates. Example99 (talk) 04:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make me able to edit WP:SAND or X1-X20, or both? Example99 (talk) 04:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I be unblocked from the Wikipedia sandbox?

Could you please let me edit only sandboxes? Example99 (talk) 04:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]