User talk:ExNavySeal10

I don’t understand why my account has been blocked. This is my only account.

Welcome

Hello, ExNavySeal10, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 02:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

December 2021

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Special Operations Forces (Ukraine), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marine Raider Regiment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Group

I undid one of your edits to Alpha Group as it was a bad wp:pipe. Please read to see how a pipe should be implemented. Cheers Adakiko (talk)

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Korean War, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 21:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Airborne Special Service Company. - wolf 21:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing...

...is problematic. Literally every single edit you've made so far has been undone. You especially have issues with adding unsourced content, and repeatedly adding the same content, after it has been removed. Not only is this disruptive for the project, but it is taxing on the time of all the other editors that have to check and fix your changes. These editors are volunteers, with only so much time on their hands, time better spent, for example, creating content. If you continue on as you have, it is very likely your account will be blocked. I strongly encourage you to read through the 'welcome' template message I placed at the top of this page, including all the pages it links to. There is a great deal of useful information there for inexperienced users (eg: you will eventually find your way to pages like: Wikipedia:A primer for newcomers). Going forward, you should make use of article talk pages; perhaps post your suggested changes there first and seek assistance from more experienced editors. You can also seek assistance from the Help Desk at any time. - wolf 21:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also check out the Teahouse

Hello! ExNavySeal10, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

- wolf 21:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at September 11 attacks. David J Johnson (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Nick-D (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExNavySeal10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExNavySeal10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet, this is the only account I have used on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

In addition to the sock puppetry, please deal wit your WP:UNSOURCED edits and addition of original research. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Please edit your current unblock request to deal with the other problems mentioned on your talk page. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Hello I appear to have been blocked from editing, due to sock puppetry however this is my only account and I can assure you I haven’t committed sock puppetry ExNavySeal10 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]