User talk:Eurocentral

BLOCKED

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eurocentral (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it is a confusion, probably because I am from the town Iași, which is similar to the name of User:Iaaasi. I suppose the block was made because Norden1990 accused me here: [1]. But User:Borsoka explained that " I think he is not Iaaasi."[2]. I was proved to be innocent in 2014: [3]. I am editing since 2012, it is absurd and unfair to connect me with Iaaasi Eurocentral (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not going to get unblocked by continuing your nationalist fighting, as you are doing below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not about only the town. Your IP address belongs to the confirmed IP range of Iaaasi, in addition to same style, disruptive edits, personal attacks, chauvinist behavior, deliberate misinterpretation and manipulation of sources. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The answer of Norden is the answer of the author of this hilarious manipulation and of the attacks against Romanian editors. In any occasion he erased all references proposed by Romanian editors showing his nationalist point of view. His actions was not constructive but destructive (erasing proposed references). The elimination of Romanian editors is one of his aims. His intentional manipulation of accusations made a lot of persons to loose time. A special verification is needed because the same accusation was checked a few years ago and all accusations were dropped.

Eurocentral (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, Eurocentral, your connection to Iaaasi is not an absurd or unfair assumption. Iaaasi admitted that you acted at his instructions "a couple of times" ([4]). He had previously let you know his email address from an IP address ([5], [6]). The IP is obviously connected to Iaaasi, as it is proved by the report of two suspected sockpuppets of Iaaasi's "arch enemy", Stubes99, from the same IP ([7]). Borsoka (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The answer of Borsoka shows why Wikipedia is considered unreliable in different societies: editors from Hungary (Borsoka and Norden) making nationalist edits on pages about Romania and attacking Romanian editors. The process is repeated with all countries where Hungarians have claims. This behavior of some editors must be stopped, limiting their actions only in the own country pages. Anybody who read Wikipedia feels when some pages are edited by unfair editors. Doing nothing means to continue with bad bias of Wikipedia. Promoting false accusations is a characteristic of above editors. Eurocentral (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Eurocentral (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC) .......................................................................................................................[reply]

....................................................................................................................... This link [8] proves even more that I am not Iaaasi. If this is Iaaasi's account, it means that Iaaasi sent a message to hismelf! Even user Borsoka stated first that the accusation is false: " I think he is not Iaaasi."title=Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=701626590 But Borsoka changes his opinions daily as we see. Eurocentral (talk) 09:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC) .................................................................................................................................[reply]

To be fair to Eurocentral, I'm convinced that iaaasi is from Craiova, Romania - since many of the anon IPs of his socks are from Craiova. Eurocentral is from Iași - hence the confusion of him and Iaaasi. But while he's not a sock of Iaaasi per se, he has been a meat puppet of Iaaasi in the past, plus Eurocentral has the Battleground mentality that he won't give up so he's constantly edit warring on pages relating to Romania/Romanians and also due to the fact that he has been topic banned from his behavior before. In my opinion, I think he should stay blocked.TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are rumors and claims that Stubes99, Borsoka, TrixAreForKidsSillyRabbit, Norden and other trolls are propaganda agents of an Hungarian espionage agency. Their job is to edit the history pages of Serbia, Romania and Slovakia by erasing references with irredentist purposes. MAKKO (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.3.242 (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong. We are the Borg. Borsoka (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eurocentral. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]