Max Planck

"True stories are dominant not because truth succeed but because its enemy finaly die."

Albert Einstein

Anyone who has never made mistake has never tried anything new.

Arthur Schopenhauer

"All truth passes through 3 stages : First, it is ridiculed ; second, it is violently opposed ; third, it is accepted as self-evident."

Confusius

Simplification of words is a priority.

Napoleon Hill

"Life is not fair because justice is an ideal. But that's also a great new that means you can turn things in your favour. Reframing !

2 keys for success are :

defined major purpose
consistent efforts create luck"

Benoit Mandelbrot

Markets have 3 results in space and time : risk, lose and win. The Zero-sum rule is describing the market exactly balanced by the losses or gains of participants.

My dream team

Angela Beesley (Wikia)
Richard Stallman (GNU)
Linus Torvalds (Linux)
Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia)
Florence_Nibart-Devouard (Wikimedia)
Ray Ozzie (Microsoft)
AxelBoldt ψ

TranslateWiki and Wiktionary

Hello, Eurobas! You were interested in TranslateWiki (see meta:Proposals for new projects#TranslateWiki, a proposal for a new Wikimedia project. I thought it could be better if there was a multilingual Wiktionary, so I have made a request, see meta:Requests for new languages/Wiktionary multilingual. I want to ask you for giving your opinions/arguments. Thanks in advance, SPQRobin 00:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC) (If you want to answer, please don't answer here, but at Meta:Talk:Requests for new languages/Wiktionary multilingual)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:2007 Forrester A46.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:2007 Forrester A46.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Image source problem with Image:Questions action learning.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Questions action learning.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2007_flyer_eurobas_game.xls.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2007_flyer_eurobas_game.xls.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cegid Group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cegid Group, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.cegid.com/societe_investisseur_communiques-financiers-fiche.asp?id=3192. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cegid Group

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Cegid Group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Agence nationale pour l'emploi

A tag has been placed on Agence nationale pour l'emploi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Badgernet (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jean-Claude Rodet

A tag has been placed on Jean-Claude Rodet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jean-Claude Rodet

A tag has been placed on Jean-Claude Rodet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Beeblebrox, i forgot that one.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Maladies sexe masculin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maladies sexe masculin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:World NO2.JPG

Because of planned licensing changes to Wikipedia and other projects, It would be appreciated if you could consider Dual licensing the above image under GFDL 1.3 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jc rodet.jpg

Thank you uploading this, image. However because of planned licensing changes in Wikipedia, it would be appreciated if you could consider dual licensing the image under the term of the GFDL 1.3 license.

Dual-licensing assists those wishing to make use of images and media on projects like Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Maladies sexe masculin.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Maladies sexe masculin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Institut de santé naturelle Fleury Rodet

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Institut de santé naturelle Fleury Rodet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication that this institute is notable, no third party sources, no indication that it meets inclusion criteria

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Theseeker4 (talk) 12:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a new school, i agree. But it is part of Gernez university --Eurobas (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Éditions Trédaniel

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Éditions Trédaniel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of Notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Éditions Trédaniel

A tag has been placed on Éditions Trédaniel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Direct Soir

A tag has been placed on Direct Soir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FLMNE

A tag has been placed on FLMNE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 11:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Courtial

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jean Courtial, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article lacks information on why this particular individual is notable - just working with someone else does not confer notabilty.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:2007 A46.PNG

This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

Just checking - did you mean to say that he's a physician (ie medical doctor) or a physicist? As he's professor of physics, I wondered. PamD (talk) 11:18, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, thank you for your question : he is a physicist.

Speedy deletion nomination of Jean-Pierre Aguilar

A tag has been placed on Jean-Pierre Aguilar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. freshacconci talktalk 20:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Eurobas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 249 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Alain Deloche - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alfonso Caycedo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henri Pujol

The article Henri Pujol has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Codf1977 (talk) 11:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Luc Romero

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jean-Luc Romero. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-Luc Romero

The article Jean-Luc Romero has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 05:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wiki company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wiki company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Lear's Fool 10:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

international space station

Hi Eurobas, Thanks for showing an interest in the ISS, if you take a look at a section called Media on the ISS page, you'll see there are currently media problems regarding the ISS. Anyhow, I won't adjust the lead paragraph as the lead section is currently suffering from edit warring, and I can't revert it to it's proper state as was reached by consensus in the talk page. Anyhow, I'd love to see you participate in making the page better. Look forward to seeing you around wiki. Penyulap (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

newsr

Hi Eurobas, I've merged your media edit, it's a good reference too. I merged it as the date of the launch is already mentioned in the preceeding sentence, and the article said it was the last EVA from the space shuttle which is true, though it sounds a bit like there are no more EVA's. Basically, most of your sentence was mentioned in the other paragraph. It's correct, but repeated what was already there. If you can find any major news organizations reporting incorrectly, please add them to the list, try to go for big, well-known names, of organizations that should know better. But do check the articles, they sometimes mention somewhere that it's the USOS or shuttle eva's. You'll probably find the best ones are american ones, they love to bend the truth. like Fox news, which I haven't checked...

I look forward to working with you on the article. Keep up the good work ! don't get discouraged.Penyulap (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Roger Tamraz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of the Commonwealth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IBM LotusLive logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IBM LotusLive logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this message ; i thought there was a bug during the import. --Eurobas (talk) 21:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]