User talk:EtherealDreamscape/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:EtherealDreamscape. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Problems with upload of File:Charlie Duplicate.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Duplicate.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kota Kinabalu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Molecule Extraction (talk) 06:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Belingus Power Station
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Belingus Power Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Pempek, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pempek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)September 2017
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
EtherealDreamscape (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was immature (14 years old at that time) and inexperienced in using Wikipedia. I did not realize that my actions actually violated the rules of Wikipedia as I thought that I can do anything I like such as doing pranks on multiple pages and uploading copyrighted files. I am really sorry and promised not to do them again. The main reason why I want to be unblocked is to change my name due to privacy reasons. Amirul Azimin (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- You should come clean about your new account also. CU note: no sign of any undesirable behavior on the new account. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Appeal block
Hello @Jpgordon. It seems that I wrote the unblock appeal template on the wrong section and cannot reply to it. Yes, I promise to be clean 100% and behave well. I will contribute positively from time to time. Amirul Azimin (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, you need to tell other reviewing admins about account you've been using (well) since last year. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what account and the process of telling other reviewing admins are, but I do created a new account called User:JellyLotus. It is still new (6 months of age) and contributed mainly on fixing or updating content. Amirul Azimin (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just noting that it's easier to reply to talk page comments located on the bottom by opening the edit window directly(click "edit" at the top of the page or in the section header"); the Reply feature is imperfect and doesn't work well in some situations. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I noticed that it had several problems. There was something odd when I tried to reply to my block appeal with a short message saying that I cannot reply and requires using the "full page edit". I believe that it might be caused by code limitations or errors of the unblock appeal template which made it on a different section instead of a newer one. Now, I utilise the button after typing things manually. Thanks for letting me know :) Amirul Azimin (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Given the time that you have been away, and the unproblematic editing on your new account, I think we may have a way forward here. Unless the blocking admin objects (I'll leave the blocking admin a note on their talk page shortly to see if they have any thoughts on this), I would be open to entertaining an unblock of you with a one-account restriction. This means that you will be indefinitely limited to operating a single account; you may either use this one, or your new one, but you will have to pick. Would you be willing to accept this as a condition of your unblock? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree and will accept the unblock condition. After careful consideration, I decided to use this account permanently for future contributions to redeem myself of my problematic past. As for my new account, I will fully cease using it on all types of work. Thank you very much for giving me such chance. Amirul Azimin (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk. I have no recollection of this block but I am happy to support this proposal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm DFO, and I approve this unblock. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Given the time that you have been away, and the unproblematic editing on your new account, I think we may have a way forward here. Unless the blocking admin objects (I'll leave the blocking admin a note on their talk page shortly to see if they have any thoughts on this), I would be open to entertaining an unblock of you with a one-account restriction. This means that you will be indefinitely limited to operating a single account; you may either use this one, or your new one, but you will have to pick. Would you be willing to accept this as a condition of your unblock? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I noticed that it had several problems. There was something odd when I tried to reply to my block appeal with a short message saying that I cannot reply and requires using the "full page edit". I believe that it might be caused by code limitations or errors of the unblock appeal template which made it on a different section instead of a newer one. Now, I utilise the button after typing things manually. Thanks for letting me know :) Amirul Azimin (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just noting that it's easier to reply to talk page comments located on the bottom by opening the edit window directly(click "edit" at the top of the page or in the section header"); the Reply feature is imperfect and doesn't work well in some situations. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what account and the process of telling other reviewing admins are, but I do created a new account called User:JellyLotus. It is still new (6 months of age) and contributed mainly on fixing or updating content. Amirul Azimin (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome back!
|
Welcome back EtherealDreamscape! We are looking forward to your contributions here on Wikipedia. Pangalau (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much for the warm welcome :) EtherealDreamscape (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Test
Just want to test EtherealDreamscape (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)