User talk:Eteethan/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eteethan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Did it sound like gossip? I probably should have accessed the wired article and the list of delta appearances on snl, but as you suggested I'll sandbox it.
I have issue with you lightly stalking my other edits, as per anal alcohol administration and powdered alcohol specifically, as those are incorrect reversals we believe.. Thanks for the suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.233.249 (talk) 05:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Eteethan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Laurent-Désiré Kabila
Looking at pages related to the recent presidential election in DRC, I stumbled upon a revert of yours from December 2017. Here is your revert, which was immediately undone by the same user here. I am trying to understand if the moresources|section tag is needed, or if it can be removed. Since this was part of your revert(s), I thought you may know more. Thanks. Renerpho (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Edit and revert
Hi Eteethan, I'm not sure if you read my edit summary, but my edit here [1] that you reverted was explained yesterday on the article's talkpage [2] at Talk:American International Group. Would you mind reverting your revert? I now am in the process of moving some of the information that is in the two citations to the article Slave insurance in the United States. If you disagree with my edit that you reverted, could you please explain yourself on that talkpage thread by responding to the points I made? Thanks, 136.56.54.123 (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Could you please stop adding unsourced, outdated information to Newtown, New South Wales tagged as such since 2007? If you think the information is correct and relevant, please start by finding a WP:RS for it. --49.255.223.3 (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Stop reverting constructive edits!
Hi, you may need to reconsider the way you are patrolling recent edits, you are reverting a lot of constructive edits, backed up by sources cited, seemingly without bothering to actually review what you are reverting. Unhelpful! --49.255.223.3 (talk) 00:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)