User talk:Estudios17
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Estudios17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as E Studios, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of E Studios
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on E Studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Be careful editing when you have a conflict of interest
[edit]Hello, Estudios17. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article E Studios, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]Hi! I noticed that per your website, you appear to be a pre-teen. I'd like to point you towards WP:GFYE, an essay that goes over basic Internet safety for minors as it applies to Wikipedia and beyond. Basically, be very careful about releasing personal details about yourself on Wikipedia or on any website. While the Internet can be a good place to explore and many people are decent enough, there are a lot of people out there that may try to manipulate you so you need to be very cautious.
That concern aside, it really is not a good idea to edit about articles related to yourself. Not only for the privacy reasons stated above, but also because I don't really see where you pass Wikipedia's current notability guidelines, which are admittedly very strict. To show notability you need to show where your company has received a lot of coverage in reliable sources like news outlets and the like. For example, if a major local newspaper covered your company, you could use that as a reliable source. Things like your own website cannot be used to show notability since those are WP:PRIMARY sources, meaning that they are things that you created yourself or were created by someone that you know.
I think that it may be just a little too soon for you to have a page on Wikipedia. Don't take this badly- a lot of people wouldn't pass notability guidelines and some of them are people that are extremely successful. Having a Wikipedia page or having it deleted doesn't mean that someone isn't doing something really amazing or incredible, so don't take it badly. You still have the potential to continue to do well and later gain the coverage needed for an article. When that happens, you can always request that the article be created or create the article via the articles for creation process. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
- Adding
{{unblock-un|your new username here}}
on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
- Adding
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)