User talk:Esowteric/Archives/2023/January
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Esowteric. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Hi,@Esowteric, I've seen your recent edits to the above draft. I have just one small quibble: You have added a page range to the citation. Is this because you have back issues? The URL would be great to have, but it's OK the way it is. Thanks-- Quisqualis (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, unfortunately, I can't get access to that edition of the magazine, so I trusted that they got the page range right at Mateus Soares de Azevedo on the Portuguese Wikipedia site. The quotation on that page indicates that the editor had access to the full review. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 07:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
The Matrix Resurrections
I see you fixed your "undo" of my edit there. I'm definitely aware that "shooting" means "the action of filming or photographing a scene, film, etc." I actually work in the film industry. :) The issue is that the article used the word "shootings," which is plural. In English, that plural word cannot ever be used to refer to filmmaking. "Shootings" in English has only one meaning, related to gunfire and human beings getting shot by bullets. It's definitely a bit confusing that the change to plural makes such a huge difference. By making it singular in your second edit, it is now grammatically correct, I just chose "filming" because it was a safer word to use there, to avoid confusion, but it's all good now. :) Jamesluckard (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)