User talk:Esnupi

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Telêmaco Borba, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ventania. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Coqueiro Baixo, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm from Brazil I speak Portuguese do not know English to these sources I getting the wikipedia of Brazil and translating with a program for English, reliable sources

The sources do not have to be in english. Eeekster (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am the good references that I did Filion

Cleanup requests

Hi Esnupi, could you please do the following steps for the translated articles you create?

Add the template message {{rough translation|Portuguese}} to the top of the article so that an editor fluent in both languages can improve it. (example edit)
Add an interlanguage link, such as [[pt:Goioxim]] to Goioxim. This creates a link to the original article pt:Goioxim. (example edit) More information at Help:Interlanguage links and pt:Ajuda:Guia de edição/Interwikis. You don't have to create any other links, such as "it:" or "no:"; a bot will do that for you.
Add a category, such as Category:Cities, towns and villages in Paraná State for Goioxim. (example edit) It's usually easy to find the right category: pt:Goioxim is in pt:Categoria:Municípios do Paraná, and the "English" link there goes to Category:Cities, towns and villages in Paraná State.
If you can, for short articles add a stub template, such as {{ParanáBR-geo-stub}} for Goioxim (example edit). It can be hard to find the right template, though, so if you're not sure, use {{Brazil-geo-stub}}.

Thanks, Melchoir (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to see if I understand

If you don't understand me, try these links for explanation:

Melchoir (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any email or msn orkut something that I can contact?

Sorry, no, I don't. Why? Melchoir (talk) 01:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you are in England or the United States?

U.S. Melchoir (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Melchoir, could you please read the cleanup request before starting more articles? You have created more than 100 articles in a week. Clubmarx (talk) 01:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lapa, Paraná

Thanks for articles like Lapa, Paraná; could you try and use proper citations, please? You can see a guide at WP:CITE. Ironholds (talk) 02:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quarto Centenário

A tag has been placed on Quarto Centenário requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cruzeiro (satellite city)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Cruzeiro (satellite city), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RichardLowther (talk) 22:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, slow down!

Hi! It's apparent that English isn't your first language, which isn't a problem in most cases. However, the sheer number of these too-short and poorly written stubs is creating a massive amount of cleanup for other editors. Please don't add any more unless and until the others are cleaned up. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: Virtually all of these entries look to be machine translations; this is a violation of copyright. Please don't use machine translations, please don't violate copyright and please consider contributing to the Brazilian Portuguese Wikipedia. Thanks. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(On the other hand, using {{Translated page}} per Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate would clear up the copyright issue.) Melchoir (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Esnupi, I left word at the admin noticeboard regarding your situation since I'm unsure as to what to do about all those machine translations. I thought you should know. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These articles don't seem to be translated from another Wikipedia

Hello Esnupi. I'm leaving this note here since others may want to know the status of the new articles you've created. Per [1] there seems to be no Brazilian Wikipedia, though there is a Portuguese one. One of Esnupi's new articles is Clevelândia, which is *not* a translation from pt:Clevelândia, a fact which which is easily seen even by people who don't know the language. The Portuguese article, if fully translated, would meet our standards here. My own vote would be to go ahead with the deletion of Esnupi's new articles on places in Brazil until such time as proper versions can be made. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tao you saying that I did not take Wikipedia articles in Portuguese and so you guys go on the wiki in Portuguese and translated for you to see if not— Preceding unsigned comment added by Esnupi (talk • contribs)

Please stop creating poor articles, like this one. Clubmarx (talk) 17:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Esnupi, please stop. Because your articles appear to have been machine translated from Portuguese, they are not proper English. Noone understands a word of what you have written. Please stop. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

now I am better the archives that I you editing, go to be fuck, of the one tesao to type these archives — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esnupi (talk • contribs)

because vain they do not start to burn thread

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

You are being blocked for the personal attack above as well as the continued creation of inappropriate material. The block lifts in 48 hours and I hope you'll return to do some positive contributions. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I should also point out that after discussion of this matter at the administrators' noticeboard, I initiated a mass deletion of all of your new content. Between your incivility, the sheer number of poorly written articles and the fact that cleaning these up would require hundreds of hours of volunteer time, it was all I could do. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olá!

Olá, Esnupi...parece que você tem arranjado uns problemas por aqui. Os artigos que você criou são traduções automáticas de textos em português, e por serem traduções não-humanas, são praticamente incompreensíveis para as pessoas que falam inglês. Você foi bloqueado por ter mandado os editores acima "se fuderem", e por ter criado vários artigos de baixíssima qualidade. Daqui a menos de 48 horas, você poderá voltar a editar, esse bloqueio serve para que você pense bem se vale a pena continuar editando por aqui, pois caso você insista com suas edições, poderá ser bloqueado por tempo indefinido. Obrigado, Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 15:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Profane comment

Hello Esnupi. If you have any desire to continue editing here on Wikipedia, I hope you will avoid making further comments like the one I just deleted from your Talk page. More such comments and you will most likely be indefinitely blocked. Since you have a desire to create articles, I hope you will settle down and stick around for a while. EdJohnston (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]