User talk:Esmé Aberdova

Hi!

I'm Esmé but you can call me Ez. I love to read and write. Esmé Aberdova (talk) 13:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esmé Aberdova, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Esmé Aberdova! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helpful tips on how to brighten someones day! (February 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Boothsift was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry, but this does not belong here on Wikipedia.

It's Boothsift 03:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Hi,

To become a reviewer, look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation.

There are also many other places where you can look.

Happy editing, --It's Boothsift 04:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Esmé Aberdova! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! It's Boothsift 04:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: The S.A.G.E Program (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi Esme, you need more references from reliable sources. Also, an organization's home page isn't really useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The S.A.G.E Program and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The S.A.G.E Program, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

It's Boothsift 06:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The S.A.G.E Program (February 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Virtually no improvement.

David.moreno72 06:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The S.A.G.E Program (February 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Boothsift was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sorry, Esme. Like what you told me, there aren't many sources about this. A reason may be that there are many programs with the same name as shown by a Google search. It isn't notable enough sorry.

It's Boothsift 06:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adoptee

Hi Esmé, thanks for your message. It's good to connect with you here on Wikipedia. I accept your offer and look forward to a fruitful exchange. Serenesage (talk) 21:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Serenesage:, @Esmé Aberdova: I think it would be better if Esme gets more experience before adopting you. Currently, she is inactive and not really clear especially when it comes to creating articles. You can find more experienced editors who are accepting, while Esme gains more experience over time. --It's Boothsift 00:55, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You make a valid point, Boothsift. I will look for a more experienced editor. Best regards, Serenesage (talk) 10:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Adoption offer

A tag has been placed on Template:Adoption offer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Embracing Your Inner Sparkle!

Hello, Esmé Aberdova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Embracing Your Inner Sparkle!.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Helpful tips on how to brighten someones day!

Hello, Esmé Aberdova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helpful tips on how to brighten someones day!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The S.A.G.E Program

Hello, Esmé Aberdova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:The S.A.G.E Program.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption Notice Expired

Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I wanted to let you know that I removed the "seeking adoption" userbox from your user page, because you haven't been active for at least a month. When you come back to Wikipedia, feel free to add the userbox back with the code {{Adopt me}}. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Passenger pigeon (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]