User talk:Ericmbana

Kekistan

I have no bias. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to promote things. The Kekistan micronation is not notable and it does not have diplomatic recognition from the government of Russia. The actual Kekistan meme is covered fairly in a section in the article on Pepe. Lost kettle (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly bigoted and abusing your position. The link does feature Russia, and it's a far more serious micronation that many others you seek no issue with. Shame on you, pathetic coward trying to rewrite history and silence free speech. In fact from your user profile description, it is clear you are just a troll with no life who is stalking people: "It's not easy being green. Meme machine. So kawaii. Chairman of the People's Laughter Foundation." Does it make you feel special?

Accusations of bias etc

I don't know what triggered your above outburst. I have no 'position' to abuse - I'm a Wikipedia editor just like you are. Throwing around terms like "pathetic coward" and "troll" is totally unwarranted and, frankly, comes across as a bully trying to silence other points of view. Why do you immediately turn to personal insults and emotion instead of engaging in logical, fact-based argument? Also, you should sign your posts. It's easy to do - four ~ symbols. Lost kettle (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Croatia–Serbia border dispute. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen from the user "Lost Kettle"'s profile, he is biased. He even literally stalked me in person. The edit has a reference. Ericmbana (talk) 21:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Croatia–Serbia border dispute. Stop the edit warring or I will block you. Take this dispute to the article's talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comments there. The deletion of the details by "Lost Kettle" is inappropriate. Ericmbana (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is a content dispute which I am not getting involved in. See WP:DR for suggestions on how to handle that. However edit warring is not an acceptable means for dispute resolution. It is a form of disruptive editing. When there is a disagreement the talk page is where it is handled, not by endless reverting. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A valid reference has been removed, which has more substance than other details on the page, such as of Autia, and further it is clear that "Lost Kettle" user has a bias from the comments on his page, and his tweeting of us. He is a stalker, who has even harassed us in person. In fact, (Personal attack removed). A ban is due: three-revert rule says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Ericmbana (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He has not reverted more than three times. Also, please refrain from personal attacks about other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred, did you read his User profile description? It is a personal attack, and a continuation of stalking. There is no basis for the referenced mention of Kekistan to have been removed, while the unreferenced Autia remains. Ericmbana (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What, specifically, on his user page is a personal attack or stalking? —C.Fred (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"It's not easy being green." - This is a mockery of Kekistan, which has the slogan "Green Lives Matter", a reference to the Pepe mascot and the green flag. "Chairman of the People's Laughter Foundation" - this is a childish attempt to parody the name of the organisation myself and many British Kekistanis belong to; with the word "Chairman" a reference to Mao, because the organisation opposes communism. This is pathetic jealousy and has no place on Wikipedia. By three reverts of detail of the Kekistan claim detail, which had valid reference from no less than the Russian government, but keeping of the Autia claim which has no reference, this user has vandalised Wikipedia. Ericmbana (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]