User talk:Erick Soares3/2019 (Archive)

Preceded by None	Archives	Succeeded by 2020

Warning

Don't request articles to be written again at Requested Articles unless you provide 3 or 4 independent sources in the request showing how the subject is notable. Thank you. JC7V-talk 15:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JC7V7DC5768, what I basically asked is to translate these articles from the Portuguese Wikipedia. The originals already have 3, 4 or more independent sources. Erick Soares3 (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a better place to request articles from other Wikipedia be written (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Intertranswiki) doing so at Requested Articles (especially without sources) is not as good of an option. Thank you.JC7V-talk 19:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Santos Dumont Avenue moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santos Dumont Avenue, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soyuz MS-13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zvezda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La Tour Eiffel (Hopi Hari) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, La Tour Eiffel (Hopi Hari), is not complete and does not have a sufficient level of English as written to remain published. Please correct and improve the language or ask for it to be copy edited. Above all, please include where the subject is located. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: You said in the history: "Undersourced, incubate in draftspace". Well, despise what happened, the article is pretty well sourced. The only problem is: a lot of the newspapers at the time basically said the same thing and I could insert 100 sources that wouldn't say anything new beyond what is already in the article (the case is basically over now without (as a lot of people feel) any kind of justice). Would be best to see the article in the main space because would be easy for the public find and help. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The ES is a canned response. What matters is the message on your talk page. So go ahead and submit the draft. Sometimes the people at AfC are prepared to offer some tips although neither New Page Patrol nor AfC are the places where you can expect the article to be rewritten for you. You might be able to get some help from thje Wikiproject Brazil.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Erick Soares3 (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Bendegó meteorite (report).

User:Kudpung while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please clean up this rough translation. Please provide the attribution for the source language.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: My level of Portuguese to English translation is not very good, so I really want that the Wikipedia public help me with the articles (because, if I don't even start the translation, the article will be forever in the "oblivion" of Portuguese Wikipedia - and the plan is for the Wikipedia be an collaborative place, no?). So, since I'm not English speaker native, send articles to the draft space or say that I need to clean a "rough translation" don't work, because for me, with my level of English, looks good and I don't know how to improve and what to do to reach that goal. The attribution is insert Template:Translated page? Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And the thing that I think is most annoying is how the Wiki suggests for me to use "|acessdate" or "|acess-date" in the refs and don't accept any of them. Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The people from Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil could help? Articles like Missão Centenário (an 2006 event) only got translated because I worked on them. Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Tour Eiffel (Hopi Hari) has been accepted

La Tour Eiffel (Hopi Hari), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1928 Dornier J 'Santos Dumont' crash

Thanks for your suggestion. I'll give it a go, trying to see how it fits in with the Santos-Dumont article. I'll attempt to avoid too much overlap.TSRL (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 21, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sexuality of Santos Dumont

Hello, Erick Soares3

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Newslinger and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sexuality of Santos Dumont, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality of Santos Dumont.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Newslinger}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Newslinger talk 01:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Santos Dumont Avenue concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Santos Dumont Avenue, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]