Jump to content

User talk:Eric-Wester/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I'm glad that you've decided to help, and I hope you find editing here as fun and rewarding as I do. :)

To help you get acquainted with Wikipedia, you might check out our introduction and tutorial, and if you need help, you can check our FAQ, ask at the help desk, or place {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will come by to help out.

You are encouraged to be bold, but it wouldn't be a bad idea to look over the five pillars that summarize Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to further familiarize yourself with how things work here.

Lastly, please remember to sign your posts to discussion areas (like this one), but not contributions to articles, by typing four tildes (~~~~) after your message. That will automagically be transformed into your username and the timestamp when you save the page.

Again, welcome. WODUP 05:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcoming new users

Hi Eric- Nice work on welcoming new users. However, wikipedia's guideline is to only welcome users with at least one edit:

There are many thousands of users without any edits, It is widely accepted that users with no edits should not be welcomed to save on server resources and also because most templates start with "Thank you for your Contributions" (or similar).

Cheers. --Blehfu (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Aww, I was not aware of that. Thanks for letting me know! Eric-Wester (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Furthermore, that first edit is quite often some sort of vandalism, which requires a bigger stick than a welcome template. :) --Blehfu (talk) 16:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
There is something that I can add my monobook page where I can add tags such as a welcome or vandalism tag to a user's talk page easier... isn't there? Eric-Wester (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hell yeah.
importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');
importScript('User:Ioeth/friendly.js');

Of course you'll want to read up on them here and here. Cheers. --Blehfu (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your help. I do hope that you will poke your head in now and again to make sure it looks like I am doing alright as I am just getting started here. Thanks for your help! Eric-Wester (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm learning as I go, too; I took a 3 year hiatus from wikipedia... Just give me a shout on my talk page. --Blehfu (talk) 16:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Installation

I tried to add those pages to my monobook.js page and the I completely cleared my cache, however, they are still now working. Is there something else that I should do? Eric-Wester (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I don't know. I'm using Mac OS X, FF 2, followed all the instructions, and they work... Try restarting your browser? (Old Windows habits die hard) --Blehfu (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The other one is still not working. Weird! Ohh well. Maybe in a little while it will magically start to work. Eric-Wester (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


My Apologies

My apologies.Sorry was reverting using huggle and the warning was meant for the vandal you reverted.Sorry but normally it would have warned me that you were reverting a whitelisted user.Sorry my apologies.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Eric you have been outstanding contributor to Wikipedia.I again profusely apologise for my error the warning was meant for the vandal you reverted.Very sorry,I have reverted the edit.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

It's absolutely essential. Huggle is amazing and is now the most popular tool for Antivandal. You have to be approved for WP:Rollback, and then go to WP:Huggle to download. It's not too complicated and you can Rv vandalism suuuuper fast, but you've got to be careful not to cause collateral damage. Check it out. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

+Rollbacker

 Done - per your request at WP:PERM. I was really impressed by your appropriate use of good faith vs. vandlism reversions, by the way. Remember to read and apply WP:ROLLBACK if you intend to use it directly. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 13:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your assistance. Eric-Wester (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Grr...

Grr....you beat me to rollbacking the blanker at Pandora :'( ...at least I don't use Huggle :P Jk. Cheers. Sincerely, Imperat§ r(Talk) 14:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Hehehe, yeah - I hate it when that happens! Eric-Wester (talk) 15:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
NOT AGAIN!! "

Cannot roll back edit to Osmium by 207.75.166.61 (talk · block · contribs) because someone else has edited the page.

The last revision was by Eric-Wester (talk · contribs).

The edit summary was: "Reverted edits by 207.75.166.61 to last version by Eric-Wester (HG)".

Grr.... Imperat§ r(Talk) 15:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I do have good news for you... I am heading out the door in about 5 minutes! Eric-Wester (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Reverting

Good to see you too, nice userpage by the way. :) - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

The Change was done to increase visibility of the Executive body within the union as we are frequently asked by people who we are, as the executive are the key decision makers at Jam Radio this is highly important --Thelostlibertine (talk) 04:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I actually have no clue what you are referring to. Is there anything that I can help you with? Eric-Wester (talk) 04:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It's OK you reverted something to an previous version, it's been corrected now, just crossed wires methinks!--Thelostlibertine (talk) 04:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. If there is anything else I can help you with, just let me know. Eric-Wester (talk) 04:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

how was that an inappropriate edit to positive hardcore? it was trying to insert the [citation needed] thingy becasue the article did not cite any sources.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ so that I will know who to reply to. Also, you may wish to check out Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thanks, Eric-Wester (talk) 04:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Signature

Not at all. Remember, everything here is GDFL meaning you can do what you like with it (within reason...) and you don't even have to ask permission. I basically stole the code from a template and then turned it into a signature. Here's the code:

—'''[[User:Eric-Wester|Eric Wester]]''' ([[User talk:Eric-Wester|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Eric-Wester|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Eric-Wester|email]])

If you need anything else, just ask. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 08:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't appear to be working. This is what appears... [[User:Eric-Wester|Eric Wester]]''' ([[User talk:Eric-Wester|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Eric-Wester|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Eric-Wester|email]]) (talk) 23:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Testing again, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 01:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Fast reverts

I wanted to know why this revert happened and checked your contribs: 10 reverts in one minute? Did someone forget to add _bot at you name? Awesome speed there. --Xeeron (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that revert, my bad. Contrary to popular belief... I am a real human! Eric Wester (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism revert

And also thanks to you for reverting vandalism on my talk page! macy 04:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Just returning the favor. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

IP reverting User talk:Mannbay2008

That's not vandalism; Mannbay2008 is posting a huge goatse picture. HalfShadow 04:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

My bad, I guess I just saw that he or she was blanking the page, so I reverted it. My bad, thanks for pointing it out. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
S'alright; I'm often suprised when an IP is being helpful. HalfShadow 04:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree. =) Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

What was wrong with me pointing out the deadlinks in RMSOLYMPIC ARTICE? WHY DID YOU REVERT MY GOOGLE CACHE OF THE BROKEN LINK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.31.232 (talk) 05:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

For information about external links in Wikipedia, see: Wikipedia:External links. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 05:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello Eric

Nice to see you here Eric, I was pottering away and found you in an edit history, cool. Dave Crosby (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Nice to see you as well. It's always cool to see familiar faces around! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 19:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Inquiry

I just tried to revert vandalism to the page Greenpeace and you sent me a message saying that it was unconstructive. Why??? Acaeton (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

This is what you added: 'be as absolutly homosexual as possible while preforming acts of pedophilia and beastiality on the internet be as fucking anoying and ass fuck david suz-dick fuck and rape 10 year old lepers !!!1111!! lolololol anonymous FTW !!!!!eleven'. Please be advised that vandalism is not considered constructive here. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 21:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I did not vandalize the Seacamp page, I was editing out a damaged template that served no purpose.Acaeton (talk) 21:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

how do i have a discussion wih erik wester?

By erik wester, I assume you mean me. (Eric Wester)? I am right here. Feel free to discuss whatever you would like! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 22:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

Hi, I noticed that you gave a level 3 warning for this edit. Would you mind explaining how it is vandalism? Same thing with the user's next edit. They definitely seem like good faith edits to me. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

My reasoning for this is that if you take a peak at this user's contribution log [1], they are constantly adding something like 'This person is worth xx' on various Wikipedia articles... And they do not cite their sources for any of these additions. However, if you think that these edits should stand, please let me know. I am still fairly new here, and I am certainly not a Wikipedia Know-it-all. =) Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 23:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I definitely agree with you that they were not good edits, but what I'm trying to say is that a bad edit is not the same as vandalism. We usually only use vandalism to describe edits that deliberately try to make wikipedia worse. In this case the best thing would have been to revert the edits and make a post on his talk-page about NPOV, sources or something like that. Keep up the good work keeping the articles clean, but don't use the V-word unless the editor is trying to make wikipedia worse on purpose. Have a good day/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 00:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Aww. You know... As soon as I posted my last message, that is what I started thinking about. I will certainly keep that in mind from now on, and thanks for bringing that to my attention. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 00:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

My recent edits

Hello. You have recently reverted my edit to IMac. What exactly was wrong? I cited proper sources. 98.124.158.152 (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Unless you can explain why you would change the word Internet to Penis, then your edit is viewed as vandalism. You may wish to read up on WP:VAND. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 02:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh but what about the article Penis. Clearly, I'm not going to go through it and replace all occurrences of penis with internet, am I? Now that we are agreed, could you please revert the iMac article back to my version. 98.124.158.152 (talk) 02:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but my goal here is to prevent vandalism, not restore it. (IE: No, I will not revert the edit.) Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 02:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't believe you want me to replace all occurrences of penis with internet in the penis article, now do you? 98.124.158.152 (talk) 02:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
You really wouldn't want to do that, because then I'd have to block you for abuse of editing privileges.. and that would be no fun at all! --Versageek 03:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
My point exactly, but Eric gets away with the exact same shenanigans. Unbelievable! 98.124.158.152 (talk) 03:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the lateness...

Imperat§ r(Talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

That's for protecting my page! :) Cheers. Imperat§ r(Talk) 16:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that does make my day better! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 16:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Keep up the great work! GlassCobra 20:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Much appreciated! Thanks and best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 20:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephen Whittaker

I advised Joeystation to blank the page as he/she wants it deleted (because she/he can't support the article). Have a look at the Talk page.... Peridon (talk) 20:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha, note that I have undone my edit. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 20:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Ta. Peridon (talk) 20:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage

Just to let you know that I have indefinitely semi-protected your userpage due to the current levels of vandalism it is experiencing. Drop me a note or ask at WP:RFPP if you would like it unprotected. GbT/c 19:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

It was somewhat interesting to see what vandals really think about me... But I suppose that is quite alright with me! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 19:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page today, and again for the warm welcome on Wikihow! - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, no problem! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 19:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your efforts in fixing my talk page against an idiot vandalCardinalDan (talk) 01:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
You are most certainly welcome. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 01:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for cleaning the vandalism on my Talk page. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 06:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

helloo

thanks for watching, but im just very surprised that a new article i wrote was deleted witout "discussion" by an "editor" on the "talk page", thats seems more of vandal behaviour really... especially when it wasnt a irrelevant topic.. Just for the record, I will make sure that i never donate to wikipedia.. anyway google seems to rank the topic pretty high, and they dont ask for "donations" psst dont bother replying. --Wikibops (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I am not an administrator. However, if you visit the URL where your article existed before, you will be able to find the person that deleted the article. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 20:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Frankly, im highly unimpressed with the "neutrality" or the quality of "editors" of wikipedia... im just surprised that the article, which ranks highly in google, and will be obvious to anyone, that its not self promoting, was deleted. Just goes to show that Wikipedia has double standards. Im most likely going to save all these threads, plus a copy of my original article and put it up on the net somewhere.. unless of course this talk page also dissapears as mysteriously as the other one. --Wikibops (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I am not an administrator. However, if you visit the URL where your article existed before, you will be able to find the person that deleted the article. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 20:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I know, i can understand English, but the "person wo deleted the article" doesnt seem to reply... like i said eralier, even you shouldnt bother replying...

--Wikibops (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

As you wish. Best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 21:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Your Reversion to Concordia Academy (Minnesota)

Please be careful what you edit on this page. We do really like our school to have as much factual information. And while, yes, this is the school's IP, I am trying as hard as possible to keep it factual. What other students do is not in my power to stop or change, but I personally keep this page as accurate as possible. Your revision actually added back several false entries both under the notable alumni heading and the powers that be heading. We'll keep this page nice. Now please bugger off unless you have some kind of personal attachment to this school.

Your reversion on Suffrage

Hi there. Just a heads up that you need to pay close attention to what exactly is being reverted when you undo someone's edit. What you removed was certainly vandalism, but you inadvertently added (worse?) vandalism back in. Check out your edit; it looks like you were the one to put that in there! These vandals are sneaky... Matt Deres (talk) 03:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Yikes, not quite sure how I missed that. Thanks for catching it! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 03:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
No problem! Matt Deres (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for vandalism revert! Matt Deres (talk) 03:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

I figured I should make up for error a little earlier! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 03:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Reverting page blanking

Hi Eric-Wester, please note that if someone blanks an article, you need to check they are not the only substantial contributor. I recently came across Iloilo National High School, which was tagged as a copyright violation by a bot. The original editor then blanked the page, but was reverted twice by you. Their page blanking, however, can be taken as their good faith request that the article be deleted. See WP:CSD#G7 for more information. In this case, rather than reverting, you should tag the article for deletion. Hope that helps, Somno (talk) 09:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Aww. I mainly edit on wikiHow, and we don't ever use that as a way to show a request for deletion. Interesting. Thanks for pointing that out to me, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
No worries, it's something that's easy to miss. :) Somno (talk) 13:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Great job

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You have been consistent,cool,nice and friendly and you are true Wikipedian Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Wish You a happy new year.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

No no, not me

Do you always chat up strangers this way? =) Felicity Tepper (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


Good Work

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep beating me to fixing vandalism! Keep up the good work. mjwilson (Talk/Contrib) 18:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Terrorism

Ok, but I think that Metropolitan Police Service are terrorist because They killed Jean Charles de Menezes. --79.109.3.62 (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

reverting vandalism help

Hi. I'm kind of new to editing Wiki. Could you tell me how you revert vandalism? I have used the "undo" to go back one edit but I want to know how you go back say 3 or 4 or more such as in the Cleveland_Browns wiki you reverted. By the way I think it needs to be reverted back further as all the edits by 66.114.31.XX were not constructive. Thanks Frosted14 (talk) 14:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

It's great to hear that you're interested in helping to revert vandalism on Wikipedia. I think you will find a lot of information on this page: Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 14:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I see you use Huggle, maybe I'll will give that a try. Thanks again. Frosted14 (talk) 15:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Aww yes. I certainly do use Huggle - it's a great tool. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 15:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for editing anon

But I wasn't vandalising Beltrami identity, I was trying to simplify the notation. The proof before was ridiculous, not conceptual at all.128.59.170.12 (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I know, sorry for the confusion about that. I didn't mean to revert your changes. I had changed it back now. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 18:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

User:193.219.146.95

I hope you don't mind my deciding to up the warning level for this user even if they may not have edited wince your post (last edit ahs same time-stamp). It's just I feel repeated edits with an agenda needed a stiffer warning. --Peter cohen (talk) 17:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Fine with me. Thanks, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 18:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Merge discussion at Talk:Tom Tucker (Family Guy)

I've opened a merge discussion at the above-mentioned location. Please consider participating if you are interested. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I will take a peak over there. Thanks, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 23:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey Eric.

Hey Wester. How's it goin?

Pretty good. You? Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, when you revert vandalism as in this instance could you check whether the previous edit was vandalism? (I especially do it when it's been done just some minutes prior the current vandalism). Otherwise it would be harder to revert it. Thanks! -- Mentifisto 17:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Aww yes, I am usually pretty good to check for that. Looks like I missed that one. Thanks, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 21:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Scotthannan

That Ip you just warned is evading an indef Block Hannan1fan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Are you an admin? ccwaters (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, you warned him a long time ago. 207.81.134.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) ccwaters (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

And right now, I feel like a very big idiot. I just went back to the history of the 2Moons page and I realized that it was in fact you who assisted me in reverting the vandalism by that one user. I sincerely apologize; I have no idea why I thought it was you who vandalized the page. Xarion (talk) 01:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Nobody is perfect. :) Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for this bit of tidying up. See ya 'round Tiderolls 11:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

You're very welcome. See ya! Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 12:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eric-Wester/Archive1&oldid=1166514021"