User talk:Er Naanu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Er Naanu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wiki Engineers, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wiki Engineers! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Wiki Engineers (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aprameya Radhakrishna

The article Aprameya Radhakrishna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough sources for WP:GNG. Notability can't be inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:54, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aprameya Radhakrishna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aprameya Radhakrishna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aprameya Radhakrishna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pankaj Chaturvedi instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankaj Chaturvedi

Hello Wiki Engineers,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pankaj Chaturvedi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karishma Mehta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karishma Mehta, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karishma Mehta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karishma Mehta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karishma Mehta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political families of Punjab, India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Government of Punjab and Faridkot. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Osofsky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Osofsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Osofsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dixiku (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political families of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi. Could you add English-language references? Please only add other languages only if English sources could not found. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 12:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Wiki Engineers (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi

Hello Wiki Engineers,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will add more info don't delete. Wiki Engineers (talk) 10:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suman Kumar Mallick (Indian Politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suman Kumar Mallick (Indian Politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Mallick (Indian Politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Wiki Engineers", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it suggests this is a group or shared account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Wiki Engineers, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wiki Engineers|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DMySon (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not promoting any topic and i am not a paid user. Wiki Engineers (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

want to publish Article about Maharishi University of Information Technology

want to publish Article about Maharishi University of Information Technology can you help me for this pls reply on infotechritesh@gmail.com

Nomination of Supriya Shrinate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supriya Shrinate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supriya Shrinate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia Profile

I have to create a politician profile on wikipedia can you share your mobile number — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.201.133.54 (talk) 04:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Yamla (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected @Yamla: Sir, I am Er Naanu, editing Wikipedia for the past 2 years. I have created and edited many articles (2087 edits to be exact). I am an Extended Confirmed User. I have done all this because I want to contribute towards Wikipedia. The unfortunate thing is that despite my good faith towards Wikipedia, I have been blocked from Wikipedia. All the edits that I have done are completely fair and unbiased. If I have done something wrong unknowingly then I genuinely apologies for that. Considering my dedication, faith and loyalty towards Wikipedia, you are requested to unblock my account.

With Regards, Er Naanu Er Naanu (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick/Archive and WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla Sir, I am not abusing multiple accounts. I only put my view to the the AFD of Suman Kumar Mallick.

So, if you think I have done something wrong unknowingly then I genuinely apologies for that. Considering my dedication, faith and loyalty towards Wikipedia, you are requested to unblock my account. Regards Er Naanu (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I

Confirmed you were abusing multiple accounts. Please reread Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick/Archive. --Yamla (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla Sir, so share my view to AFD discussion is sockpuppetry. I don't put my view to the AFD discussion of Suman Kumar Mallick article only. I participated in various AFD discussion. Regards Er Naanu (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:SOCK for the description of sockpuppetry and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick/Archive. --Yamla (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla Sir, so now I am not edit any articles in Wikipedia in future also. What to do now for unblocking? Er Naanu (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. We'll expect you to acknowledge your abuse of multiple accounts and list which accounts were yours or were directly related to you. You may be required to go six months with zero edits (see WP:SO) and you may need to avoid to avoid writing about Indian politicians. I want to be clear, I'm not saying you must do those things. But certainly this is what I'd expect as a minimum before considering unblocking you. --Yamla (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla,

Greetings ! Last Year, you said that if I go six months without any edits on Wikipedia and avoid writing about Indian politicians, my account will be unblocked.

I've followed your instructions and all the Wikipedia Guidelines. Considering my dedication, faith and loyalty towards Wikipedia, you are requested to unblock my account. Thankyou.

Regards,

Er Naanu Er Naanu (talk) 18:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla Sir, you are a very experienced en-wikipedia administrator. I respect you personally. Please help me regarding unblocking. Thankyou Regards Er Naanu (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained what you must do. --Yamla (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected User:Yamla,

Greetings ! Last Year, you said that if I go six months without any edits on Wikipedia and avoid writing about Indian politicians, my account will be unblocked.

I've followed your instructions and all the Wikipedia Guidelines. Considering my dedication, faith and loyalty towards Wikipedia, you are requested to unblock my account. Thankyou.

Regards,

Er Naanu Er Naanu

Er Naanu (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't gone six months with zero edits. You haven't gone six weeks with zero edits. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #69293

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]