User talk:Epictetusfanforever

September 2018

Hello, I'm Aspening. I noticed that in this edit to New Acropolis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Acropolis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Acropolis, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at New Acropolis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aspening (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am trying to correct information regarding the New Acropolis due to my personal experience with it and many friends that are part of it. New Acropolis is a nonprofit with thousands of members across the world. Some of this misinformation in the Wikipedia page has caused people that were looking at joining at the nonprofit to not join because of fear that it is a cult.

Epictetusfanforever, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Epictetusfanforever! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)