User talk:Ephriam3

Welcome!

Hello, Ephriam3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

I have noticed your contributions to articles related to the Oglala Lakota they show that you have a great deal of knowledge about these topics. However it is important that you state the sources of your additions so that other editors can verify them. New content that cannot be verified by reliable sources can be deleted at any time. You can learn more about citation style and use of sources on wikipedia by reading Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Enjoy your editing and we look forward to see many more contributions form your hand.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 09:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NA Leaders At LBH

Hello Ephraim I just wanted to drop by and express my appreciation for your contribution of the names of Lakota and Cheyenne leaders at LBH. It gives the article more proportion and balance (even thougnb the number of extensive lists was one of the factors that failed the article's GA nomination - I actually like the way the article as evolved [and have contributed to it significantly myself]).

I do have a query in addition. You have listed Two Moon(s) {I've seen it translated both ways] alone for the Northern Cheyenne. My query is this - most NA accounts of the battle point to the significance of Cheyenne Lame White Man, who was reported by them to have said something to the effect of "Come on! We can kill all these soldiers!" as he charged into the Deep Ravine, killed several soldiers, and rode out (no small feat of horsemanship, if you've seen the battlefield) before being struck in the back and killed by a bullet. He was followed into and above the ravine by other Cheyenne warriors, who destroyed the group of 25-40 soldiers trapped there by the fact they could not see it until they were in it and their large mounts could not negotiate the steep sides.

Despite the fact that the article mentions a current theory that this was the last action in the Custer sector of the battlefield - earlier and other NA accounts have suggested that it was this charge by Lame White Man (or this part of a general charge) that actually initiated the dissolution and collapse of the Custer battalion.

I see on your user page that you have considerable background in the ethnology and history of Northern Plains tribal groups. I know a bit about the organization of Cheyenne society - the difference between a "war" chief from the warrior societies like the Dog Soldiers and peace leaders - but not enough to say whether or not Lame White Man merits inclusion on your list. I'd value your opinion on that. Sensei48 (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Sioux War of 1876-77

Hi! I am part of WikiProject Wyoming and I saw a few of your edits pop up on our watchlist lately. I am rather excited to see somebody with serious knowledge about the Plains Indian conflicts editing these articles as I have lamented their state for quite some time. While I can read a book with the best of them, I am at best an armchair historian, and not a very good one at that. But I do have some knowledge of the ways of Wikipedia, so I will try to help where I can. For starters, I noticed that we have three articles that describe the Great Sioux War of 1876 - Powder River Expeditions, Black Hills War and Great Sioux War of 1876-77. I think we should consolidate the three articles and redirect them all to Great Sioux War of 1876-77 when it is ready. We can then use that article as an overview of the War and link to the individual battle pages for more information. Before we do anything rash, I thought I would check in with you to see what your plans are for Great Sioux War of 1876-77. Thanks. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 00:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Have something shiny!!

Just a note to let you know your work is noticed and appreciated! My area of interest is the history of the United States Army between the Civil War and World War I, which overlaps on occasion with what you've been doing, so I have run across your name in various places. I just thought I should say howdy and leave a token of gratitude. I hope to run into you again. Keep it up!! Ejosse1 (talk) 14:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks, Ephraim3, for expanding Wikipedia's coverage of the history of the United States Army by creating the article Department of Dakota. Ejosse1 (talk) 14:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touch the Clouds

If you get a chance, can you stop by Talk:Touch the Clouds and give your expert opinion? There is some question as to if Touch the Clouds was at Little Bighorn. Everything I can see says that he was not (according to Camp and Cheyenne River Agency records), but I am lacking real references to advance the point. I understand that it is of intense pride to claim that one's descendant fought at Little Bighorn, so I want to make sure that it is well referenced. Thanks! CosmicPenguin (Talk) 17:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just nominated the now greatly improved article Good Article, so, just to inform you. J.B. (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You are doing a great job contributing to the article! Since you started editing it, the quality has been greatly improved and the article has become almost twice as long as it used to be. If the article passes GA the credit will be all yours. Cheers! J.B. (talk) 14:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Gall

Chief Gall is said to have weighed 300 lbs. First of all: where is the source for that? Then: how tall was he, that is not mentioned. Jouke Bersma _{Contributions} 08:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touch the Clouds

Please come on over to Touch the Clouds for the GA review. There has been a bit of horseplay apparently with the article, but I think we can salvage everything.

Any help appreciated.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ephriam3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Touch the Clouds 1877a.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Touch the Clouds 1877a.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ephriam3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Encouraging Bear

The article Encouraging Bear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. This and this had some information, but hardly enough to support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Encouraging Bear for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Encouraging Bear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encouraging Bear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]