User talk:Enzaga

Enzaga, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Enzaga! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Enzaga/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Enzaga/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 08:06, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Enzaga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Enzaga, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 08:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What should I do to add this new concept of Structured Innovation to the body of knowledge? How does Wikipedia promote thought leadership? Enzaga (talk) 10:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting thought leadership is not something Wikipedia does. That's discussed in the information on original research linked below.

Please also note that copyrighted text may not be added to Wikipedia! I notice that you have created a new sandbox with text that was cut and pasted from an external website. That is a copyright violation; I will add more info on that below. --bonadea contributions talk 12:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Innovation

Hello Enzaga, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to address your question about the topic Structured Innovation: you mention that this is a new approach which you have formulated, and which has not been described before. Unfortunately, this means that Wikipedia cannot have an article about the concept. Wikipedia articles are based on what reliable and independent sources have written, never on personal knowledge and original research. (Please take a moment to follow those links and read the information.) You should also note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and newly coined words should not have articles; again, an article could exist once a number of independent sources have discussed the concept critically, not just defined the word. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Enzaga/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Enzaga/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.odi.org/publications/5220-management-techniques-structured-innovation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 12:12, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is so confusing

Hi, Please note that there is a link at the bottom from where the material was taken. It was not used as one's own but with due credits. Maybe the format for referencing was not properly followed. So, from what I gathered is that on Wikipedia there can be no original thing, only secondary sources material but that too in one's own words and with citation, right? Even if something is taken verbatim with proper references quoted is not allowed.

Yes, more or less. You simply may not copy copyright material from external sources into Wikipedia (unless it's as a quotation, in quotation marks, with attribution); otherwise, whether or not you attribute the source makes no difference. Everything you write here must be in your own words. Please ask here if you have further questions. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]