User talk:Enviroboy/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Enviroboy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Sorry!

I just edited the new entry I created for Illuminations. Hope it meets with your approval. I used the already approved and published article on our parent company, Yankee Candle Company as a guideline. ~~Cecilia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Candle_Company

This is the fourth apology on my talk page. What's going on? (replied). ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 00:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry!

Gomenasai (sorry in Japanese). I have nothing better to do ^^; 67.176.247.138 —Preceding comment was added at 05:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the welcome message and for reverting the vandalism on my user page. FlyingPenguin1 04:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 04:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the very fast vandalism revert on one of my article pages. You are a useful guy to have around! Richard75 20:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

You must be referring to The Doomsday Scenario. No problem; it's what I do around here. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 20:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Maureen Brennan

Thanks for spotting that. I normally do check the history. It must be time for another coffee! B1atv 22:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

hehe. The admin would have caught it even if I didn't. I reported the anonymous user that posted the attacks to WP:AIV. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 22:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey this is all really cool! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allsaints07 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, its much appreciated! Lloydpick 00:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem. It looks like someone has a grudge against you. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 00:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Help me correct this

I believe that you put a speedy delition on the genetic epistemology page that I have started. Could you please help me solve this problem? Thanks.

Yes, I tagged the page. More on Talk:Genetic epistemology. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 01:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

I am sorry that my edits have offended you, please read thw Will Moscoti disscusion to view why I have written this page the way I have, I have written direct quotes from people, and written their opinions, please read the disscusion, thank you--Shreder143 21:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Like I said, feel free to re-write sections of this article, I am actually very good freinds with Will, yet due to the nature of this article ie. (mass opinion based), I must write the opinions and facts, please tell me specific parts of the article to change, and I will Thank you--Shreder143 21:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The article was an attack page and was deleted under g10. I'm curious to know why you removed the archive-box from this talk page. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 22:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

OK

Thank you Enviroboy!! ur so amiable! Lateta 21:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome :) ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 23:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

more vandalism

The dude at 24.59.165.171 has made another vandalism to Molasses it seems. I have little experience with wiki moderation, so, with your permission, I turn it to you if he does it yet again.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.7.232.227 (talk) 06:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Replied. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 06:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

It copyrigthed

My writing is copyrighted. Everyone has had the opportunity to review the argument, but you may not publish my writing any longer than I say so. I'm not afraid to publish my thoughts when I get around to refining them and cleaning up errata. But whereas certain individuals harass me here your license to publish my writing has been revoked. Inopibus 23:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry about the "editing" earlier today. A friend of mine thought it would be funny to use my account when I was signed in. Thank you for fixing it.

User talk:Movaughnliveson88

I hope you don't mind, I already gave him a level three warning, I changed yours to a level 4. Corvus cornix 03:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't mind. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 03:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Heh, it doesn't matter, he got blocked anyway. :) Corvus cornix 03:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!!

for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Saturn star 23:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Warning

I removed the 3RR warning because I never actually edited the article in question. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 00:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Giganotosaurus has not been officially declared LARGER than T-Rex however, it was longer from what we have found so far. T-Rex was also more heavily built. So do not jump so quickly to give me a warning. I'm being very neutral in these articles.

responded. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 23:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The same goes for you as well. I have nothing against these predators and I refuse to use favortism for either 3. I am up for a discussion because it is important not to misinform people.Mcelite (talk) 23:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)mcelite

responded. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 00:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I am up for a discussion without a doubt. I apologize if it seemed that I was aggressive towards you. I will be on tomarrow and I'm fully open to resolve the article in a manner that is not biased.Mcelite (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)mcelite

Hi Enviroboy, my apologies, I was just reverting what I thought was possible vandalism, I never intended to enter an edit war, I have nothing against User:Mcelite. The three big theropods articles have a lot of trouble with vandalism, people wanting their favourite to be bigger than the others, and they don't provide reliable sources. Its this sort of edit that I am reverting,

'Spinosaurus emerges victorious by snapping the <juvenile> tyrannosaur's neck' Where is the source that states that the T.rex in Jurassic park 3 is juvenille? Steveoc 86 (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Response: User_talk:Steveoc_86#Giganotosaurus. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 00:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Christianity and Slavery

I'm actually the person that posted and deleted the page on Christianity and Slavery. I wasn't logged on when I posted first and had meant to post on Slavery in the United States. My apologies.--Taylor2008 (talk) 04:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to say replied. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 06:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 23:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

np. The same person vandalised this page as well. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 01:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Reverts

~~Hey, why 3 level warning, not notifying? Why do you bring shame on me? If there is no such template, you could but use this one!~~

~~A. Demidov Talk 05:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)~~

~~Besides, I did not violate 3RR! I did 3 reverts, not MORE! Please, take that warning off from my page.~~

~~A. Demidov Talk 05:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)~~

SORRY!!! I could not see the text was crossed, I was on the cell phone.

A. Demidov Talk 08:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Another sorry!

Added my username by mistake as I'm a newbie. I think it's fixed now.

Wiki Ray B 19:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

lol. It's all good. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 19:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

newsectinadddeddsoican fit inj around here

so,rrrrrevrtrn myedits,huh/? YOu gotta problem, son? ~~ I AM NOT AN ALCOHOLIC! (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)j~~ffffffffffffd~~ I ASKED YOU A QUESTION —Preceding unsigned comment added by I AM NOT AN ALCOHOLIC! (talk • contribs) 01:31, 7 December 2007

Where's a lolcat when you need one? ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

REMOVE MY WORK!

ALL YOU HAD TO DO WAS TELL ME THE PROBLEM AND I COULD HAVE MADE THE CHANGES. BUT NO, WHILE I AM IN THE MIDDLE OF WORKING ON IT YOU JUST DELETE EVERYTHING! DELETE ALL OF MY WORK, AND MY ACCOUNT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by MiahX (talk • contribs) 18:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Who would want to do anything for this place if you can just come and hack away everything I have done with no good cause. Nothing was copyrighted. Just remove everything I have ever done and remove my account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MiahX (talk • contribs)

replied. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 02:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

help with harvard college edit

Hi - I am wondering if you could explain to me why you changed "Harvard College" back to "Harvard University." As the wikipedia entry for Harvard College makes clear, as well as the Harvard website itself, Harvard College is the undergraduate part of the larger university, and it is Harvard College, not another part of Harvard of Harvard University, that JFK attended. Thank you.Marciamaria (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

re. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 01:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't figure out how to ask Dravecky, who is the one who made the change, why he made it. Could you, a more experienced Wikipedia contributor, help me out here? Thanks.Marciamaria (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

re. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 01:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

the problem is that when I try to click on his talk page, there is no place to leave a message (but maybe I am doing it wrong). again, thank you.Marciamaria (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

New user

Trying to move information from Honeydripper website to Honeydripper Wiki with permission of Honeydripper producer.

Suggestions? Honeydripper (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Re. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 03:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Wrong aplication!

Hi, I'm so curious why do you think that those article it should be deleted. I think they are very notable regarding the fact that i find many details about them on google, details which are in commendatory terms. So, please don't enforce again "Articles for deletion" to those articles. many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.36.80.198 (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Re. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 03:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Thank you for the warning. If you review the history of the page in question (plug-in hybrids), you will find that the person who reported me is the real offender of the 3RR rule. I made specific and reasonable edits. I cited those edits and provided detailed explanations. Fbagatelleblack is the one who reverted all of my edits 3 times with no specific explanation on the talk page. I suggested to Fbagatelleblack that he should make specific edits if he thought something was not right, but he chose to completely revert everything with no specific explanation instead. Moreover, Fbagatelleblack admited on J T Price's talk page that he is "obsessively protective" of the article in question, and even went so far as to invoke the language of war by refering to wanting the "reinforcements to arrive." So if anyone is fueling an edit war, it is Fbagatelleblack. Fbagatelleblack is the one who should be warned. I encourage you to look into this matter carefully before blocking or banning anyone.Xchange (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in this matter. As I have mentioned on Talk:Plug-in hybrid I will refrain from further edits on this section of Plug-in hybrid until you and/or other admins have given me some guidance. As of his most recent revert, [1], Xchange is in clear violation of WP:3RR, and I encourage you to take further action in this matter. Also, any suggestions you could offer me regarding how I should deal with similar situations in the future would be much appreciated. Fbagatelleblack (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching that vandalism. Much appreciated.

Bagheera (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Prod Tag on Misery (Band)

The only reason I readded it is I wasn't sure if he meant to remove it. If you feel it wasn't an accident, go ahead. -Carados (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Ehh, the fact that they've been around for over ten years and released four albums gives me the hope they are actually notable and I wanted to give people some time to check for sources. -Carados (talk) 07:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Driving Wheel (band)

(notice blanked)

I did not create the article; I tagged it for speedy deletion under a7-band. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 22:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)