User talk:Enterprise Explorationist

Welcome!

Hello, Enterprise Explorationist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring

Per WP:BRD, you need to go to Talk:Shakya and start a discussion to get consensus to restore the material you've been trying to add.

You also need to cite professionally-published mainstream academic sources for all your changes, and be complete in your citations. For example, you keep listing Hinduism as the religion of the Shakyas, even though most academics regard Hinduism as a later growth of the Vedic religion. Also, you only cite "P. 16 The Buddhist Forum edited by Tadeusz Skorupski," but there's multiple volumes of The Buddhist Forum. You also cited the Vinaya Pitaka, which is a primary source that needs a secondary or tertiary academic source to support your interpretation of the primary source.

Ian.thomson (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just not read the above message or do you not care? Ian.thomson (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Shakya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Shakya. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

JimRenge (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add unsourced text as you did here. And if you're same as User:They call me Mr. Farenheit / User:I'm The Invincible Man etc., have a look at WP:SOCK. utcursch | talk 21:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]