Jump to content

User talk:Endroit/Japanese pens and stationery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plan of attack?

[edit]

So, what's your plan of attack for making this into a decent article? I'd like to help if I can. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. I believe we agree that the contents and images here are valuable, despite the AfD decision to delete. Unfortunately, it is probably easiest to split up the article, unless you have a better idea. I will explain my plan in the section below...--Endroit (talk) 05:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I need a few hours to draw up my plan, so please wait.--Endroit (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, unless there is some unusual pen or stationery which was developed in Japan, I don't see any reason to try to keep it all in one article. I think splitting it up may be the best option in order to keep the useful information and place it where it's likely to be best used and most easily found. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Plan of attack: Splitting this page up

[edit]

All sections of this article will be incorporated into other relevant articles, except the Erasers section. (The "Erasers" section will be all that will remain, and perhaps a separate article Japanese erasers can be newly created later).

Text (& images) in the "Pens" section will be moved as follows...
  1. Uniball Signo Bit 0.18 mm section → Uni-ball#Models of pen include
  2. Pilot Hi-Tec-C section → Pilot (pen company)#Products
  3. Pilot Petit1 section → Pilot (pen company)#Products
  4. Uniball Mitsubishi Alpha Gel Pen section → Uni-ball#Models of pen include
  5. Brush Pens section → Tombow
Sourcing
To do, afterwards

OK, I'm done for now. This is the basic plan. More to follow for the other sections.--Endroit (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The following links may be used for reference. Some of these may be added to their respective "External links" section, in each target article.

--Endroit (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]