User talk:Enaya Afzal

User page My talk page Articles created CSD LOG PROD LOG Email me here My gallery My status My tools

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Koimoi

Hi there, re: this, please don't use Koimoi as a reference for box office figures. The Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia doesn't consider it a reliable source. Please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Okay..!! But what to use for reference source — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 13:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources should make it clear which ones are suitable and which ones are not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Thannk You— Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 14:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

csd tagging feedback

Tyler newman mclean not G11 A7 or G2
Maithili thakur hasty taggy 1min10 sec after creation Dloh cierekim 13:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: Don't be tagged immediately — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 14:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was tagged far too soon,1 minute, 10 seconds. That you don't understand this is troubling. RHawthorne deleted almost 2 hours after creation. (Of course, any effort by the creator to improve the thing halted after you tagged it.) There is no hurry. I give articles at least an hour before tagging for deletion, unless they are attack pages. I generally wait 2 hours after creation before thinking about deleting them. Did you search the internet for possible sourcing of the subject? That would slow down your tagging a little, and maybe give the creator time to improve the article.Please read WP:BEFORE. Dloh cierekim 15:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Google news search for "Maithili Thakur" turns up sufficient hits that the creator might have come up with a claim of significance had they had time to improve the thing. Dloh cierekim 15:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: I have your thing don't understand what you say wish are..!!!— Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 07:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason

@Ivanvector: Tell me why I've been blocked — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 13:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

My apologies, I should have posted this earlier. You are the user AdnanAliAfzal. You are blocked from editing for creating promotional articles about yourself or someone you represent, and because technical and behavioural evidence confirms that you have repeatedly created multiple accounts to evade your block and recreate your articles that have been deleted. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition I've removed the background colour from this page, as the colour you've chosen does not comply with MOS:CONTRAST and makes it difficult for readers with visual impairments to read hyperlinked text. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enaya Afzal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have so on Wikipedia multiple accounts created.Because I Wikipedia rules did not know . And I also did not know that Wikipedia on the same account housed this reason when I have an account block is then I second account takes to make.So forgive me further ever mistake will not be.Thank You

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. Regardless, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Make your unblock request on your original account. You will not want to claim you "did not know" our rules, as it's very clear you know perfectly well your behaviour was in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK and you are deliberately violating our rules. Yamla (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

— Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 15:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Account

@Yamla: What this is not original account of my — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 15:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: What is the meaning of the original account..?? — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 15:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for being a sockpuppet of AdnanAliAfzal (talk · contribs), so that is your original account. --Yamla (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Will User:Enaya Afzal have to request from User:AdnanAliAfzal here — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 16:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. Make the request on the User talk:AdnanAliAfzal page, using the account AdnanAliAfzal (talk · contribs). Given the long history of abuse stretching back to at least October, 2015, you will not be eligible for an unblock at this time. Your best bet is WP:SO which requires zero edits for six months. Even then, you'll have to explain your huge amount of abuse and convince Wikipedia you'll never again violate our policies. --Yamla (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Where do I request for unblock and what evidence should I give? — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 16:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In six months time, after you have made zero edits and stayed away from Wikipedia entirely, sign in as AdnanAliAfzal (talk · contribs) and make your unblock request at User talk:AdnanAliAfzal. In your unblock request, indicate that you are applying under WP:SO. You may be required to disclose all other accounts you were using and explain why we should trust you, given your total disregard of our policies over the past 18 months. --Yamla (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And when that day comes, might I stipulate ban from tagging articles for deletion? No need to resume that disruption 6 months hence. Dloh cierekim 16:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to user

@Masum Ibn Musa: Please tell me how my account will be unblock. Please help me when it will be unblocked. How will my account open? Tell something brother...— Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 01:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enough. I have revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 01:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And now, your email access. Go use your original account. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commando 2 Cover.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Commando 2 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phillauri Cover.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Phillauri Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shashank Khaitan

Template:Shashank Khaitan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dear Zindagi Cover Poster.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Dear Zindagi Cover Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:M.S. Dhoni The Untold Story Cover.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:M.S. Dhoni The Untold Story Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shivaay Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shivaay Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kahaani 2 Cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kahaani 2 Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Half Girlfriend First Look Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Half Girlfriend First Look Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sharat Katariya

Template:Sharat Katariya has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Samir Tewari

Template:Samir Tewari has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wgolf (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coffee With D Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coffee With D Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]