Jump to content

User talk:EnCASF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, EnCASF, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! I dream of horses (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, EnCASF. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses (talk) 01:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iridaceae

[edit]

Okay, I'm in the process of editing Iridaceae and I can see It's going to need a good polishing, and at times possibly require hitting with a hedgetrimmer. Right now I'm working on the "description" section. I'm explaining so the edits don't come as a shock when they get through. Given that Wikipedia is a general interest encyclopedia, we don't need to be nearly as detailed as a Botanical reference (if only because Wikipedia is not meant to be a botanical reference, though it borrows some of its cues from them). As such, I'm trimming a lot of details that says "part may be a, b,c, or d" because if its possible shape is too broad, it doesn't really help giving an idea what the shape is actually going to be (hence why I ultimately eliminated the whole sentence about stems: all stems are "simple or branched", and when discussing them, the vast majority of readers would assume them to be aerial, while the shape part is too broad to be truely useful). I'm also trying to eliminate much of the worst jargon (e.g. "terete" which gave me a serious o_O moment). I also think the second paragraph of your intro, with a bit of work, could be easily put in the "description" section. Anyway, if you have any questions regarding my edits, feel free to ask and I'll explain or revert myself. Circeus (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, it's not that your English is bad (I've seen way worse), it's more that my specialized botanical vocabulary is not quite up to some of those word (or I would have caught the typo in "monocasial" myself). Being a learned amateur helps with writing more accessibly, but it is often also troublesome because you,re not quite sure what the scientific article is saying (which is why I don't dabble in taxonomy as much as I'd like to: I don't understand phylogenetic studies). Sorry, I'm rambling. In short, don't be ashamed of your English :D Circeus (talk) 22:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to ask me for things like that :p I'm quite neutral as to what images are better to use. Personally, my only criteria is that, if possible, the image should have a species, or at least a genus article to link, so feel free to change the images. I think it's a very good idea. I'd only suggest using wild, rather than cultivated species. Circeus (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need to apologise

[edit]

Clearly, I've been terribly gauche in dealing with the Good Article Nomination. I should have waited a bit and organized my thoughts better before posting my comment regarding the ixioideae/crocroideae situation, and certainly not failed the GAN at the same time. Although I do believe the article needed a bit more work before it could become a GAN, I was not sure how best to avoid another person failing it. I should have talked to you directly about it instead of recklessly going as I did. Normally, this is were I would claim having been bold, but being bold implies being sensitive to other users, and this I wasn't. By doing that I not only reacted exaggeratedly, but I harmed the encyclopedia.

I can't stress it more: I was an idiot (I need to stop editing late at night, dammit!), and I do honestly want to help you write these articles. Circeus (talk) 13:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've outlined better what I see as the source of problems with the croco/ixioideae on the Iridaceae talk page. It would seem the issue is in WP:OR or outdated material. I've made redirect and kept only the names currently accepted according to Goldblatt&Manning' The Iris Family (lukily enough, the page discussing Crocoideae is available on Google books). I'm currently working through the article to fix Ixioideae to Crocoideae. Circeus (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your thanks! Copy editing is easier work for me, compared with the main job of getting useful and serious content in. Imc (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ty

[edit]

Thank you for creating Caliphruria. Keep up the good work! Kingturtle (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cladogram

[edit]

Well, your text clearly stated that these three tribes form a polytomy with the non-Amaryllideae rest of the family, so I edited the cladogram to display a polytomy. Circeus (talk) 03:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, I don't have that much knowledge: merely had a hunch the template could take in a polytomy. I personally find it unpalatable to work with, and it is all to your credit that you managed to wrangle such a nice cladogram out of it. I'll revert it soon (reading something at the moment). Circeus (talk) 03:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amaryllidaceae

[edit]

I've been editing the English version of Asparagales, using a lot of material from the Spanish version. One difference is that I have updated to APG III, whereas the Spanish version is still based on APG II. This has some consequences though, since ideally the Asparagales families articles should be updated to APG III as well. I've done some work on this. The main changes are needed at the three broadly defined families in APG III (Amaryllidaceae & Asparagaceae in particular). Amaryllidaceae is a much larger (and better) article than most of the other Asparagales families. Looking at the history, this seems to be due to you. So I'd like to know any views you have on changing the page so that Amaryllidaceae sensu APG III is the main topic. There could be a separate page on Amaryllidoideae/Amaryllidaceae s.s.. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text

[edit]

Hello, you've added a lot of material to Amaryllidoideae, but at least some of it violates copyright, for example, this version. Please see discussion at Talk:Amaryllidoideae. Nadiatalent (talk) 14:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

[edit]
Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Amaryllidoideae, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.amjbot.org/content/88/12/2321.full.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00036772#page-1 and probably others - see talk page of article -, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Amaryllidoideae saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Amaryllideae, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.amjbot.org/content/88/12/2321.full, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Amaryllideae saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cyrtanthus, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/cyrtanthmack.htm and possibly other sources; see talk., and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cyrtanthus saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Iridaceae, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from see talk, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Iridaceae saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Given the extensive range of problems discovered in content you've placed, I have opened a contributor copyright investigation to look into your other contributions. You can find it here. The purpose of that page is to facilitate cleanup of any lingering copyrighted content you added to Wikipedia. Your assistance in identifying copied or rewriting it to comply with policies once identified would be helpful. Please keep an eye on that page if you'd like to track its progress.

You may not receive additional notices as content is discovered and removed.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to come by my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Condolences

[edit]

Maybe you are now in a best place... R.I.P. Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 00:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EnCASF&oldid=1257816173"