User talk:Emperorxijin

Welcome!

Hi Emperorxijin! I noticed your contributions to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016 Brunei Super League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Sport. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Phon-ek Jensen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Phon-ek Jensen. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phon-Ek Jensen has been accepted

Phon-Ek Jensen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 11:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Siamfootball per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Siamfootball. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emperorxijin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was accused of being a sockpuppet with many supporting reasons by other fellow Wikipedians. However, I would like to explain why I am not. I am a Thai football fan who realized there are not as many pages on Thai footballers, Thai football, and there are many errors & wrong links in Thai football pages and would like to help contribute by creating and contributing to Thai footballers that are deemed notable (passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL). Therefore, I made my new years resolution to start editing Thai football-related pages early this year to help achieve those goals. However, I did not know this was around the time a recent sock was blocked, being one of the reasons I was blocked. I am confused whether that would be the fate for other Wikipedians being blocked for Sockpuppetry for editing articles within a certain interest after a recent sock that they do not know of was blocked. Upon entering the Wikipedia community this year I have become aware of Sockpuppetry and how re-creating articles created by sockpuppets would lead to one being accused of being a sockpuppet. Thus, I have created Thai footballer pages that are deemed notable (passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL), but changing the spelling to avoid accusations because I am here to genuinely grow Thai football on Wikipedia and to give notable players a place on this platform. I may be wrong in this part because it clearly did not help me not be accused as a sockpuppet and should have started a discussion or notified other Wikipedians that pages created are notable and deserve a page creation, but I genuinely believed the pages created were created for the right reasons - the footballers being "notable", deserving a page on Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I felt my contributions for creating new pages, as well as many edits on Wikipedia on pages related to Thai football, were helpful for this area of interest. I did not only create pages of Thai footballers that were notable but also made many fixes and created links between players and Thai football seasons. I think it is important for the future generation of Thai football fans to have a place to find the correct information and links about former Thai League 1 players and other Thai football personnel. As a result, I think I am useful to the community and my intentions are genuine. Ever since I started editing on Wikipedia this past year, I have never violated any policies on Wikipedia. Therefore, it was very surprising to find out I was accused of being a sockpuppet. I do believe my contributions are useful for this community, not only for Thai football, Wikipedia:WikiProject Football but also for Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand. Blocking me indefinitely would only halt my edits and fixes on Thai football seasons which I am currently working on to fix corrections and make correct links to the right players on certain matches or current squads. In addition, halt the creation of other notable Thai footballers who deserve a place on this platform.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, which means it is based on behind the scenes technical data that links this account to another. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Emperorxijin, your contributions are not up for question right now, no one is questioning your article creation. It is that a checkuser has found evidence that you are a sockpuppet of a blocked editor which has resulted in ban evasion. To be unblocked, you need to wait a decent amount of time and log into your original account and make an unblock request from there. An ordinary admin can not lift a checkuser block, that can only be removed by a checkuser who has found no further editing from you as an IP editor logged out or as a newly created account. So, please do not edit any further except to make a subsequent unblock request from your original account. I recommend you reading over guide to appealing blocks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]