User talk:EmpD++

Don't dare to make my talk page dirty.

October 2008

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrrhus of Epirus

Please clarify which additional sources you wish to be added. It's not desirable that articles be "permanently tagged", especially if there is no on-going discussion as to how to resolve the issue. Alai (talk) 01:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

you have been reported for breaking WP:3RR. --Tsourkpk (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 24h. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And indefblocked as obvious sock of User:Emperordarius. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Superantispyware

I have nominated Superantispyware, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superantispyware. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ospalh (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Superantispyware for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superantispyware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superantispyware until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Luk ^talk 10:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SuperSAS.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:SuperSAS.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BootSafe.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:BootSafe.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]