User talk:Emolina101

Emolina101, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Emolina101! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz

Hello Emolina101,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GirthSummit _(blether) 19:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, Emolina101. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition of promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Wholly cited to connected sources, like "our practice". Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Professor Doctor Ernst von Schwarz

I've moved your new article to draft space since it is not ready for main space. Specifically, it does not cite any sources at all and reads like a resume or CV rather than a Wikipedia article. Please read WP:YFA for advice, and when you believe you have worked on the article enough, use the WP:AFC process. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 20:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernst Von Schwarz (February 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article is written like an advertisement and violates WP:NOTRESUME. Would also need incline references per WP:INCITE.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst Von Schwarz

Hi - you've had the article deleted twice, moved to draft space, and rejected as a draft. If you would like to talk about what's wrong with the article, please drop me a note on my talk page - I'd be very happy to discuss it with you. Please stop trying to find ways to get it accepted though - it's starting to get disruptive. Please do reach out if you'd like to discuss it. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 23:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Girth Summit, more than disruptive as here it is again. Maybe a WP:NOTHERE block would be appropriate. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And, reported. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusing to engage with other editors warning you about your edits. this is a collaborative project.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ernst Von Schwarz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ernst Von Schwarz. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]