User talk:Emmagood 1995

September 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence does not have an edit summary. Also: List of awards and nominations received by Meryl Streep. Your edits have been reverted. Feel free to re-create these edits but, this time, provide an edit summary to explain your edits.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emmagood 1995, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Emmagood 1995! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Heath Ledger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dark Knight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Cate Blanchett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Gift, Babel and The Aviator (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards 2012) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards 2012, Emmagood 1995!

Wikipedia editor Karlhard just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your helpful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Karlhard's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards 2012

added links pointing to The Master (film), Argo (film), Amour and Frankenweenie (film)

Indiana Film Journalists Association

added links pointing to The Grandmaster and Her

Las Vegas Film Critics Society Awards 2012

added links pointing to Bully (film) and Les Miserables (film)

Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards 2011

added a link pointing to Melancholia (film)

List of awards and nominations received by Cate Blanchett

added a link pointing to Paradise Road

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 7, 2014 (notice #1)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kathleen Turner, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 7, 2014 (notice #2)

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kathleen Turner without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

November 7, 2014 (notice #3)

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Per WP:FIES, please start providing a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are necessary for editors browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please start making it a habit to use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Late thanks for your contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Cate Blanchett. Working on fixing up/improving few things myself :). --Lpdte77 (talk) 08:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jennifer Lawrence, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category blanking

@Emmagood 1995: Can you explain your recent edits blanking AACTA categories, removing them from source article, and removing categories from actresses' pages? e.g., [1], [2]. You did not give a reason in your edit summaries. --Lapadite (talk) 07:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

The reason why i remove the categories from actresses' Pages Is because the AACTA Awards doesn't have categories like: "Best Actress AACTA Award winners" or "Best Supporting Actress AACTA Award winners". @Lapadite77:

Yes they do; you blanked the respective categories. The categories correspond with the Wiki pages for AACTA International Award for Best Actress, and Best Supporting Actress, two awards that were first awarded in 2012 and 2013, respectively. As a general note, you should consult other editors before deleting category pages; certainly, shouldn't be blanking them at your sole discretion. If you take issue with certain categories feel free to discuss it at WP:CFD. Lapadite (talk) 12:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do, but only because i created the categories pages but, as i told you before, the AACTA Awards, who has been awarded since 1958 don't put the categories names like "Best Actress AACTA Award winners" (that are for actresses in Australian films) and i don't know why they should put the "Best Actress AACTA International Award winners". They are not like the a Oscars who put the "Best Actress Academy Award winners" categories. @Lapadite77:

Categories are created to group pages on similar subjects and place subjects in them accordingly. When a category is created, one generally has to add the name of the category to the subject's article for the subject to be added to the category (appear in the category page), not vice versa. Those categories should exist as the awards exist and there are winners of such awards. The AACTA International Award is a new award from the organization, and that's why there are only a few people within the categories. I'm not sure what you mean by: "the AACTA Awards, who has been awarded since 1958 don't put the categories names like "Best Actress AACTA Award winners" (that are for actresses in Australian films) and i don't know why they should put the "Best Actress AACTA International Award winners". They are not like the a Oscars who put the "Best Actress Academy Award winners" categories." - the award category names in Wiki are collective in nature; naturally, they don't repeat verbatim the title of the award given by the organization, if that's what you mean; It's clear "Category:Best Actress AACTA International Award winners", for instance, is referring to the AACTA International Award for Best Actress, especially since the award's article page is linked in the category page. If you mean that the awards are not independent, they are; the Oscars only have one Best Actress Award (and it's inherently international); AACTA has a Best Actress award (given to Australians/actors in Australian films) and an International Best Actress award (along with Supporting), which is given to actors in non-Australian films, i.e. international films. See: [3]. P.S, i'm not receiving a notification; try using {{ping|username}} or {{u|username}} instead. Lapadite (talk) 00:33, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Central Ohio Film Critics Association

added links pointing to Dirty Pretty Things, Lost in Translation, Jim Taylor, Nathan Johnson and Tom Stern

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NYFCO 2004

Can you cite a source that shows Virginia Madsen as the supporting actress winner and not Blanchett? on IMDb she's tied with Laura Linney. --Lapadite (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Here on the official NYFCO page. @Lapadite77:

Thanks. Lapadite (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nevada Film Critics Society Award for Best Youth Performance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Holland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nevada Film Critics Society

Hello, Emmagood 1995,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nevada Film Critics Society should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevada Film Critics Society .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 19:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nevada Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nevada Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevada Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]