Jump to content

User talk:Emitchell62000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Emitchell62000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ~Kylu (u|t) 06:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Louise Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmanuel College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Lancet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Award. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mastering Suspense, Structure & Plot cover art - Jane K. Cleland.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mastering Suspense, Structure & Plot cover art - Jane K. Cleland.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ink and Bone(novel)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ink and Bone(novel), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/u/lisa-unger/ink-and-bone.htm.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ink and Bone(novel), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/u/lisa-unger/ink-and-bone.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ink and Bone(novel) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 21:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ink and Bone for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ink and Bone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ink and Bone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Spark (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You have copied from http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/cytosorbents-corporation-to-present-at-the-in3-medical-device-summit-otcbb-ctso-1577672.htm Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

You added "HemoDefend is a development-stage blood purification technology for the blood transfusion industry intended to reduce transfusion reactions and safeguard the quality and safety of blood products."[1]
Ref said "HemoDefend is a development-stage blood purification technology platform for the blood transfusion industry intended to reduce transfusion reactions and safeguard the quality and safety of blood products."[2]
Did you have permission from the company in question to release the text under an open license? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I requested information and permission from the company, and received this via email. Emitchell62000 (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it is helpful, the text is also here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1175151/000114420411069084/v242754_ex99-1.htm Emitchell62000 (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay can you email the permission to be? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. The Wikipedia email doesn't allow attachments; would you like me to send it to a specific address, or just copy-paste it (there were attachments) Emitchell62000 (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second issue

[edit]

Are you able to also address the FantasticFiction issue detailed above? Emitchell62000 (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes so you copied and pasted from the cover of the book? Or what happened? We do not allow copy and pasting from book covers by the way. The text must always be paraphrased. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I typed it in from the hardcover copy of the book. I apologize--I'd seen so many other Wikipedia pages that use cover copy, that I assumed it was ok (should have checked!) But it's definitely not copyrighted by FantasticFiction. Emitchell62000 (talk) 21:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It however is copyright by someone. If the author has given release of the text under an open license can you email it to me?
If you see other pages copying and pasting please point me to them so I can clean them up. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third issue

[edit]

You will need to comply with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure aswell. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I apologize; because I'm blocked, this page is not letting me put comments under specific headings above (using my phone at the moment). I will try to move them to the appropriate section when I get back to the computer.

Second Issue: I need to check, but the copyright to the jacket copy text is held by either the author or the publisher. (Regardless, it is not held by FantastcFiction nor Amazon nor Barnes & Noble nor any other site that uses it to describe any particular book!) This particular text is also on Lisa Unger's website here: http://lisaunger.com/books/ink-and-bone/synopsis/. But no, I did not get specific permission to use it. I can certainly do so, if that is helpful (not sure whether it matters at this point?)

I can definitely begin compiling a list for you; I have not kept one, since I did not realize this was an issue. I assumed the same rules that apply to book cover images applied to the text used. I'm sorry.

I have done paid work for Lisa Unger in the past, but am not doing so for this book. As I understand the paid contributor rules (which might well have changed; I have not rechecked them recently), this would not apply in this case? Regardless, I am now blocked so cannot make any changes to anything save responding to this thread. Should this change, I will go back and check any changes I've made are in accordance with the current policy. Emitchell62000 (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay yes fair use is complicated. While we allow very limited fair use images we do not allow fair use text.
Can you list below all the articles for which you were paid or had a COI and list who paid you and through what companies those payments occurred. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Understood re fair use. If I'm allowed to participate again, I'll certainly do so being educated about this!

There are three articles that I contributed to that had a relationship with the company I was employed by at the time (I have not worked for them since 2011). The company, RLM Public Relations, paid me. The pages are: IncrediMail, Revolution Money, and Richard Laermer. While I was not paid directly by any of these, Richard Laermer is the CEO of the company. (I doubt this is relevant--because it's a spirit rather than letter of the law thing--but just in case: it was an employee of Wikimedia, which was then still headquartered in St. Petersburg, where I live, who suggested I might have helpful content to contribute. So the impetus wasn't from the client/company.)

There are a number of pages for authors and books that I have contributed to, but I have not been paid to do so. Wikipedia is generally my first stop when I am looking into potential clients, and I've often made changes to pages--or created missing pages--based on other information I've found through this process. I also have a lot of friends who are authors; last month, I attended an event where I took a lot of photos of authors, for example, and I recently uploaded an updated one to a page (it is a photo I took, so the copyright isn't an issue) because the one that was there was many years old. When I have used photos taken by others, I have gotten the appropriate copyright clearance and submitted it through the Wikimedia site.

As I understand it, a COI doesn't exist if changes are made prior to or following the existence of a business relationship. I may we'll be misunderstanding that, though.

I apologize for the length of this--just trying to be thorough! Please let me know if you need any additional information. Emitchell62000 (talk) 20:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are writing the page before they become your client I would still include that as a COI. I would imagine you mention your Wikipedia efforts when you approach them to become a client.
Also what about "Cytosorbents Corporation". If they are a client of the company you work for that definitely looks like a COI.
Can you link to the photo you took yourself? I might have tagged it by mistake if that is the case. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok--the only thing I can do now is respond to this thread, so I can't actually disclose anything (given the understanding I now have of this and other issues, I certainly would if I could).

This is the recent photo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TwistHeadshot.jpg I believe there are some others, but I would have to check. My only connection to Twist is that she is a friend; it's not a commercial relationship. I don't see anything on the page that would not conform to the neutral point of view. Am I missing something?

Cytosorbents was a client of a company that I have done contract work for; that's how I heard about them first. I don't know whether they are now, but since everything I added to the page is deleted, it seems like that's taken care of? FWIW, the page is woefully incomplete (I tried to post a request for someone to look at this, but I'm also blocked from that).

I very much appreciate the amount of time and effort you have taken to explain these issues to me. Just wanted to mention that. I have never intended to cause problems; going back to when Wikipedia was about creating a "comprehensive collection of all of the knowledge in the world," I was just trying to lend a hand. Emitchell62000 (talk) 22:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay if you took this picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TwistHeadshot.jpg no need for the deletion template.
COI is not just about commercial relationships.
Not enough of the rest of this adds up unfortunately. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way.

I understand that COI is not just about commercial relationships; this is why I mentioned the friendship. I certainly was not trying to do anything nefarious.

So this means I'm number 826?

By the way, the link to an article in one of your references ("Why we should all edit Wikipedia") leads to a page that does not exist. You might want to fix that unless it's deliberate. Emitchell62000 (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which link has "Why we should all edit Wikipedia"? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you some additional information via email; if it would more appropriately posted here, please let me know. Emitchell62000 (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes have been thinking about the issues in question. I would agree to an unblock along the following lines:

  • The user is to always extensively paraphrase going forwards.
  • They are to use independent sources (not press releases)
  • They are not to edit articles directly when they have a conflict of interest or expect to have a conflict of interest in the future
  • Due to their employment they are not to work on medical information.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to abide by these conditions, of course.

I missed the note about the article link before; the piece in question is available here: https://ubcmedicaljournal.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/ubcmj_3_1_2011_32-33.pdf. It is referenced here, under Publications: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Doc_James Emitchell62000 (talk) 01:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thank you for your understanding. You are now unblocked. Happy editing :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Emitchell62000 (talk) 01:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Emitchell62000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Emitchell62000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Emitchell62000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul McHugh (Author) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul McHugh (Author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul McHugh (Author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lapablo (talk) 21:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lance Edwards moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Lance Edwards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 15:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your notes. Regarding your WP:UPE or WP:COI concern, I am not being paid for creating this page, nor do I have a conflict of interest. As you know, this is difficult to prove, but I became aware of Lance Edwards when a friend shared an article with me about his Operation True Potential program because my daughter works in affordable housing. This led me to look into who was behind it; naturally my first stop was Wikipedia. I did fact-check some of the information I found online with the company to be certain it was accurate, and they provided an official bio for Edwards; I had not cited this, but have added this. I have removed the details about his personal life (wife and residences), though, because I could not find a third-party source of this information. I have also added additional citations from authoritative third-party sources. I would very much appreciate your taking another look! Emitchell62000 (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Those Who Wish Me Dead Cover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Those Who Wish Me Dead Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lance Edwards (February 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nosebagbear was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources present fall into one of several camps: primary, unreliable, or only mentioning Lance Edwards himself briefly (with additional detail being either about the business or a family member). There may be additional sources that exist about the books such as reviews, but they aren't present.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nosebagbear (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lance Edwards

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Emitchell62000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lance Edwards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emitchell62000&oldid=1258266447"