User talk:Emeritahistorian

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Harvey Ellis. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.Andy Dingley (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now raised at WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Emeritahistorian_reported_by_User:Andy_Dingley_.28Result:_.29 Andy Dingley (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Harvey Ellis

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Emeritahistorian reported by User:Andy Dingley (Result: 24h). EdJohnston (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]