User talk:Emailmope
Emailmope, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Emailmope! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Sara A. Stires for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara A. Stires until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Eddie891 Talk Work 00:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Edith Molikoe moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Edith Molikoe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —Bukkit 16:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- it was suitable as another editor created the page, you are wasting everyone's time. Emailmope (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Emily Glazer for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Glazer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rachel Elizabeth Campbell
[edit]Hello, Emailmope. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachel Elizabeth Campbell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC) |