User talk:Elton2978

Hi Elton2978! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on The Cranberries, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

If it's been announced, then please provide the reliable source or stop - FlightTime (open channel) 23:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 19:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Eddie Guerrero, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. INeedSupport ^:3 17:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Elton2978! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! StaticVapor message me! 01:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

edit summaries

Please use them. They are helpful to other editors. Thanks. Spicemix (talk) 12:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Silver King

I am confused, you add something and immediately remove it because it is a tabloid? Why even add it then? MPJ-DK (talk) 17:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, did not realize it was a tabloid, sorry. Elton2978 (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You realized it like a minute after posting it? Maybe a little patience in your editing speed would help, just a friendly suggestion. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know, I would be a little more cautious. Elton2978 (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elton2978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is any reasonable reazon to block me now, since then I have being not doing anything but to help Wikipedia. Elton2978 (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elton2978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okey first of all I am very sorry, in this case I would use the one you tell me; this block is no longer necessary because I have understand why I was blocked at first, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. If you want to, you can even check the edits I have done on the following pages since I create this account; : Ramón Valdés :: Mae Young ::: Silver King :::: Summer Rae ::::: Ashley Massaro :::::: Dana Brooke Please, I have already understand that what Ive done in the past was wrong. Elton2978 (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not mention your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Assuming you are acknowledging those violations, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You must make the request with your original account. Given your violations here, you won't be unblocked there either, not at this time, as you've proven yourself to be continuing your abuse. Yamla (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.