User talk:Elpresiobama

Concern regarding Draft:Rey Logan

Hello, Elpresiobama. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rey Logan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rey Logan

Hello, Elpresiobama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rey Logan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Io Shirai

The current revision is fine. See MOS:ALLCAPS for more details. --Mann Mann (talk) 13:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Io Shirai. Mann Mann (talk) 13:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what lmao? what wrong did i did, i just fixed it into caps, because her name is legit in caps. Elpresiobama (talk) 15:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Better read the MOS:CAPS Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When in a content dispute, stop reverting and discuss. If agreement is unobtainable, seek WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Elpresiobama (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Elpresiobama". The reason given for Elpresiobama's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: ‪Daniel Case‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: blocked directly. duplicate Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresiobama (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Elpresiobama (talk) 12:47 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Calyx Carter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Calyx Carter, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This unblock is indefinite (it has no set end date), but is not meant to be infinite. You are refusing to comply with our Manual of Style (MoS). This is disruptive, as it creates work for other editors to correct your MoS violations. If you will agree to comply with the MoS in the future, and in particular with MOS:CAPS, then we're all good, and you can ask me or any other admin to unblock you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i did not edit anything, I don't know why i got blocked. Elpresiobama (talk) 10:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Elpresiobama (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even if i did edit something wrong idk, i edited something from WWE, because it was in real life, and i followed the news and edited it like everyone else, I don't know why i was the one who got banned. Elpresiobama (talk) 10:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked. In the future, please be more responsive when other editors come to you with concerns about your edits. Communication is required. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 13:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am really sorry, but I don't understand what was the point of doing this to me.. Elpresiobama (talk) 10:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked you because you keep changing Iyo Sky to IYO SKY across multiple articles, even after multiple warnings and a previous block for doing so. Can you agree to follow our guideline on capitalization in the future? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 10:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am so sorry. Elpresiobama (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean i changed Iyo Sky to IYO SKY, because WWE names her everywhere as IYO SKY, even she named herself on Twitter as IYO SKY, so i thought that's how her name should be like..very sorry for the mistake,

i promise to follow your guideline on capitalization rule in the future. Elpresiobama (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tatum Paxley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tatum Paxley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 12:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know what to fix. Elpresiobama (talk) 12:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatum Paxley (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatum Paxley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elpresiobama! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatum Paxley (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatum Paxley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tatum Paxley

Hello, Elpresiobama. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tatum Paxley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tatum Paxley

Hello, Elpresiobama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tatum Paxley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 09:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per this. Pinging Tamzin for information as per their previous block. Lourdes 09:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lourdes: My block was over something very minor—maybe the most minor thing I've ever indeffed someone over—so I wouldn't give it much weight here. I agree that the personal attacks here justify an indef, though. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 16:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You anyway need to change your username as impersonating well-known personalities is unacceptable. So your indefinite block on this account is not going to get lifted. Secondly, you need to confirm you understand our content pillars completely before you even request for an unblock. Thank you, Lourdes 09:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 09:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]