User talk:Elpresidente360

October 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to P-Square have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: P-Square was changed by Elpresidente360 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863895 on 2023-10-08T07:40:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The latest publication made on Psquare page is not a vandal. It has citations and references. Do well to cross check and reverse it. Elpresidente360 (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elpresidente360! Your additions to Cultural Impact of P-Square have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your submissions, but I have some questions.

Firstly, I newly created that Page "Cultural Impact Of Psquare"

My questions are:

1) How many edits will I make it take for the page to be approved?

2) They recently said the page is "orphan" with no linked pages, how can I fix the orphan issues and link it ?

3) After I have done everything. how long will it take for it to be looked into by the administrators?

I eagerly await your response. Elpresidente360 (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Elpresidente360:

1) There isn't a set number of edits for a page to be approved, though it won't appear in search engine results until a reviewer reviews it.

2) Just find other pages that mention the subject, and add links from those pages to your new page.

3) Pages don't need to be approved by administrators, though passing editors may make some adjustments and add maintenance tags, if needed. See my response to question 1.

Also, please remove all material that you may have copy-pasted into articles from external websites. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Nigeria, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elpresidente360. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblocking Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresidente360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My motive for joining the Wikipedia community was for a good cause. I have edited many articles in Caribbean, Asia and Africa. Well, I acknowledged that my foremost edits was Centered on a particular page. I have neither promoted nor advertised on any of my edits, because all my edits comes with a notable and verifiable citations. I will try to improve on the diversification of my contributions subsequently.Regards. Elpresidente360 (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user evaded their block as Parislondoner, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elpresidente360. --Yamla (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A point of note.

I have sent you an unblocking request earlier and you can clearly see I have not breached any Wikipedia policies and guidelines. My edits come with citations and that's one of the goal of Wikipedia's content policies- VERIFIABILITY.

If the reason I gave you is not sufficient to unblock me (because I have not broken any Wikipedia rules of notability and editing policies), then I will call it a day in this Wikipedia whole stuff. I won't engage in any further dispute resolution, I will gladly leave this community forever for you people. Elpresidente360 (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have breached WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BREACH FROM WHERE TO WHERE?

I (elpresidente360) DID NOT BREACH! I am not the only user of my gadget. If anybody or my friends logged using in using my gadget, that is none of my business.

Like I said earlier, I won’t be engaging in any further discussion with you. Thanks while it lasted. Elpresidente360 (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledging a misdeed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresidente360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the Wikipedia policies, and I later found out I breached a Wikipedia policy of sockpuppet. Four things things: The perpetrator used my device; I am not the only user of my device; I have confronted the perpetrator and I accept complete responsibility for his actions and the inconveniences it has caused. I will further abide by the rules and conduct expected that are expected in the Wikipedia community. REGARDS. Elpresidente360 (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First of all, I doubt you have enough proficiency with English to write articles on English Wikipedia. Second, this really doesn't make much sense. It both admits to sock puppetry and denies sock puppetry. Third, "someone else did it" isn't an accepted defense from sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Reconsideration

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresidente360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting for a reconsideration for my blocked account ‘Elpresidente360’. I was initially blocked for promotion only-account, then operating more than 2 accounts ‘Elpresidente360’ , ‘Parislondoner’ and recently ‘Chengqingy’. Yes, I was the one managing those accounts. I initially did not know that users of multiple accounts should notify the Wikipedia administrators for proper documentation. I have received a lot of positive compliments by users and administrators for my contributions on Wikipedia which shows my motive for joining Wikipedia was for a good cause. Now, having read all the Wikipedia rules and regulations, I admit my misconduct and I am assuring such act will not occur again. Thank you

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified continuing abuse of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elpresidente360 (talk) 21:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note further Confirmed block evasion, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elpresidente360. --Yamla (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Reconsideration

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresidente360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am requesting for a reconsideration for my blocked account ‘Elpresidente360’. This month will make it the 6th month I was blocked since October 2023. At first, I was blocked for promoting only-account, then operating more than 2 accounts ‘Elpresidente360’ , ‘Parislondoner’ and recently ‘Chengqingy’ and ‘Mike Janetta’. And these actions clearly violated Wikipedia policies of using multiple accounts and block evasion. I initially did not know that users of multiple accounts should notify the Wikipedia administrators for proper documentation. I admit my wrongdoings, and have now read Wikipedia policies and guidelines pertaining my case. Moreover, I am now willing to abide and stick to Wikipedia community customs. Furthermore, my contributions to Wikipedia will be focused on fixing grammar, checking and adding references, expanding short articles, adding image, improving lead sections, and other positive contributions to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Elpresidente360 (talk) 2:15 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

You'll need to go at least six months without evading your block to have any thought of being unblocked. That looks like some time in June of 2024 You will not be unblocked to edit about P-Square anywhere on Wikipedia. You'll need to deal with the WP:COPYVIO warning you received. You never answered the WP:PAID notice. Thanks for your consideration of these matters.(These are not customs, which are quaint and non binding, that you violated. You violated policies.)-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's been less than three months since you were last caught evading your block. Frankly, I find it highly unlikely you'd be unblocked under the terms of WP:SO, given your maliciously abusive behaviour. There's essentially zero chance you'll be unblocked before you've gone six months with zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like your last set of socks were still trying to promote the subject you were initially blocked for trying to promote. You'll need to agree to not do that in some future unblock request after going six months without evading your block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With the denials and admissions, trust is hard to achieve. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I wait till June, I want to make some clarifications. You talked about WP:PAID. I was never paid by any person or group to make any contribution on Wikipedia. Everything I have edited was based on my sole interest to do so. Secondly, will certain articles one had created be restored (if requested) when unblocked? Elpresidente360 (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cultural impact of P-Square

Hello, Elpresidente360. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cultural impact of P-Square, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request, June 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elpresidente360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am requesting for a reconsideration for my blocked account ‘Elpresidente360’. This month will make it the 9th month I was blocked since October 2023 and 6th month I evaded blocking since December 2023. When I requested to be unblocked on march, I was instructed that the six months started from December and not October 2023 when I was initially blocked. This month is making it 6 months plus since then. Regarding the WP:COPYVIO and WP:PAID notices. Firstly, the copyrighted content was when I was transferring my content from ‘Legacy’ subheading on Psquare article to the newly created ‘cultural impact of Psquare’ page. So it was still my content. And while it may appear that I was over editing on the Psquare page then, I was neither paid nor endorsed. I only contribute on articles or pages I have interest or knowledge on. At first, I was blocked for promoting only-account (which I have addressed above) then operating more than 2 accounts ‘Elpresidente360’ , ‘Parislondoner’ and recently ‘Chengqingy’ and ‘Mike Janetta’. Creating other accounts or using them while being blocked violated Wikipedia policies of using multiple accounts and block evasion. I initially did not know that users of multiple accounts should notify the Wikipedia administrators for proper documentation. I admit my wrongdoings, and have now read Wikipedia policies and guidelines pertaining my case. Moreover, I am now willing to abide and stick to Wikipedia community customs. Furthermore, my contributions to Wikipedia will be focused on fixing grammar, checking and adding references, expanding short articles, adding image, improving lead sections, and other positive contributions to the encyclopedia. Thank you.Elpresidente360 (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As this appeal has been open for nearly three months without a response, I'm procedurally declining to grant the request. Per Yamla's notes below, as you are community banned from editing for abuse of multiple accounts, any appeals will need to be reviewed at WP:AN. Please review WP:UNBAN and make a new appeal - please ensure you include a request for an administrator to move your appeal to WP:AN for review when you're posted it.Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No strong CU evidence of recent block evasion. However, their extensive evasion in the past may mean they are banned, not just blocked (WP:3X). Nor have the other issues been meaningfully addressed. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Yamla, the key to the UTRS request I sumbmitted is not working, so I can not check update from my request. 2 months has passed since I submitted another one on my talk page. And I want to know the status of the application. Thank you. Elpresidente360 (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your UTRS request is no longer active. Given that your above unblock request did not meaningfully address the problems, I'm not surprised it hasn't been reviewed. I suggest you take it down and make a significantly different WP:UNBAN request. --Yamla (talk) 16:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]