User talk:Elperrofeliz345678
Hello, Elperrofeliz345678, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out [[ the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 01:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Elperrofeliz345678, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Opium of the people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Argentina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No religion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Requesting help in article expansion
[edit]Hi,
Requesting you to have a look at
and also
- Draft:Ex-Muslims and also Draft Talk:Ex-Muslims
Requesting article expansion help, if above topics interest you.
Thanks and regards
Bookku (talk) 05:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for April 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthodox.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]Seriously, start using edit summaries now. Are you aware of having this page, your own talkpage? If you continue to edit without edit summaries, I will block you temporarily, which will hopefully help you locate this page (via the block log). Bishonen | tålk 19:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC).
Hello, I'm Rsk6400. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mulatto have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. I'm referring to the first edit, where you removed a sourced claim. You might also want to heed the advice on edit summaries @Bishonen: and other users gave you. --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked for one month for continuing to edit without edit summaries despite several warnings. Please respond below, to show that you have found this page and to acknowledge the comments you have received here (for instance, concerning your disruptive edit at Mulatto, where you removed important information). Depending on what you write, you can probably be unblocked as soon as you respond. Bishonen | tålk 07:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC).