User talk:Eliz81/Archive 14

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eliz81. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008

--Chef Tanner (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. StaticGull Talk 11:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Word of advice

Seems like you are moving in the wrong direction. You are never going to achieve your Orwellian goal of erasing every trace of my long and continuing presence on Wikipedia, so grow up. You are indeed a good "typographical angel of death". ~~a compliment which seemed to please you at the time although you have since removed it from your talkpage.~~

I don't know who sicced you on me or gave you a piece of my clothing to follow the scent - maybe it was Alison, Sir Fozzie, One Night In Hackney - I don't know. I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:IAR to learn that you have discretion and that not every page I create(d) has to be deleted; other admins know this already. But then you are more like a bot than a human anyway so it would probably be lost on you.

RMS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.132.254 (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

cough, cough... I suggest you either get your unban via arbcom, or stop editing altogether. For what it's worth, I am not without compassion for your plight and I would support your unban (there's been a lot of trial runs of those lately) since most of your recent contributions seem to conform to guidelines. But meanwhile, the ban stands. Just know that you're not going to skirt around your community ban on my watch, good sir. Your continued history of sockpuppet abuse, among other things, suggests a lack of respect for the basic rules governing Wikipedia. And on the contrary I'm far from a bot, I have many clever means of tracking you through human intuition. If you have a problem with me correctly enforcing existing Wikipedia rules, surely you realize that snarking on my talkpage is not the means to bring about the change you desire. While it is frustrating for you I'm giving teeth to WP:BAN, getting yourself unbanned is the only way to go here. (Oh and the typographical comment is still on my talk page, I don't know why you were suggesting it had been removed?) Cheers! ~Eliz81^(C) 20:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey thanks for everything. Where do we go from here? RMS.

P.S. - If I am unbanned can you restore, not every edit you reverted, but the biographies/pages you deleted in toto. It would make no sense for me to have to do them all over, but I don't want to put the carriage before the horse.

Robert, I'm also watching this closely indeed. While I'd also support an unban, it would have to be under seriously restrictive conditions, at least for some time. That would likely include putting you on "Troubles" ArbCom restrictions. But yes, conditional unban - you already know where I stand on this one - Alison ^❤ 18:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Hank Green redirection

Hi! I see you've locked the Hank Green page. Would you be so kind to redirect it to the Brotherhood 2.0 section on John Green's page? (That was the general consensus in the deletion review last month.) Much obliged :) JoinTheMadVender (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hank Green redirection

Hi! I see you've locked the Hank Green page. Would you be so kind to redirect it to the Brotherhood 2.0 section on John Green's page? (That was the general consensus in the deletion review last month.) Much obliged :) JoinTheMadVender (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Do me a favor

Create a redirect to Dale Earnhardt page from Redneck Jesus. I don't want to create an account and this would make my heary happy. Dale Earnhardt is Jesus for Rednecks so it works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56.0.143.24 (talk) 19:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Tommy Godwin

Hi Eliz, we spoke before a couple of months back. I would like to report a case of vandalism and / or poor editing at Tommy Godwin (footballer). The vandal whose IP addresses begin with 213 or 82 has been very persistent and has continued to mess with article for several months. He / she seems to be a supporter of Shamrock Rovers, one of several teams Godwin played for. One issue is the constant renaming of a paragraph about Godwin’s Early Years to Shamrock Rovers. Godwin only spent a short period of career at Rovers and the paragraph includes refs to three other clubs and not just Rovers. Secondly he also insists in adding this link [1] which can only be accessed by paying to log on. Thirdly in doing these changes he removes references that have been previously added to the article. In addition the vandal refuses to login or use the talk page to discuss edits. At least one other editor User:Schcambo has reverted his edits and another User:SoWhy has requested he use refs properly. I have since learned that the same person has also been accused of vandalising Jason Gavin by Peanut4 and has also been warned on his talk page by User:Schcambo. Any advice ? I believe these two articles should be semi-protected and or the IP addresses should be blocked to help prevent further vandalism. Djln --Djln (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)