User talk:Elf/Archive 5

Archives from roughly 2006 through end of 2011.

Sleet Versus Hail

Yes, what you've been seeing in California IS hail. SLEET falls with winter storms, not thunderstorms. As a professional meteorologist, I don't know how many times I've wanted to slap people for getting sleet and hail confused (the people on the sleet page among them ;-) ). You virtually never get sleet out in California, but hail occurs fairly often. On the other hand, sleet is much more common in New York. Check out this graphic [[1]] for SLEET, and this page [[2]] for HAIL formation. Also, here's another good page on the differences [[3]]. Famartin 15:49, 4 March 2006

Meet The World's Smallest Police Dog

[4] (—The preceding unsigned comment was added by SirIsaacBrock (talk • contribs) .

Copyrights for Boggle Photo

Sorry about not citing. I took the photos myself and forgot that I had to release the rights from myself. Hope all is good now. Black arrow 01:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reworked boggle

sorry about the problems I was causing. I put the copyright info in the drop down and not in the body as well. Now hopefully all is good. Black arrow 05:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tons

In your edit summary on Zion National Park in response to by editorial comment in the article about identity of tons, you said "short ton if it came from any american documentation which seems 98% likely".

However, if it in fact came directly from an American soils sciences journal or most any other scientific source, its about a 98% chance that the tons are metric tons (they might, of course, be "Mg" (megagrams) in a journal like that). Gene Nygaard 03:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cite journal

Hi. I found your message on template talk:cite journal#authorlink is broken. I responded there. Please have a look. Sorry for being so late (better late than never ;-). --Adrian Buehlmann 16:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yests

Not at all. Thanks for the edits. BTW, what is the protocol, does one normally reply on their own talk page or on that of the other party (like this).--Counsel 05:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manzanita

Hi Elf - curious why you said "can't have 3rd-level header w/out 2nd-level" - it is perfectly possible to have this, and it looks a lot better without the heavily underlined 2nd-level header in a short page like that - MPF 22:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Keep up the good work! :-) MPF 22:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

9 days is a close one! AFAIK, the only appearnce effects I can think of is in a TOC, which only appears when there's more than 3 headers (when funny things happen to the numbering in the TOC). In my browser, 2nd level headers give an ugly underline right across the page, making it look like a much more complete change of subject (like a line of 4 hyphens); it would be nice if the refs/ext links could also take a 3rd level header, but 2nd level headers seem (unlike other headers) to be a definite wiki policy (so I leave them!). Maybe I should raise it at wherever header policy is discussed and get 3rd levels OK'd for short articles - MPF 22:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Min Pin

Hello Elf.

I normally agree with most of your changes, but you made a change to the Minpin page that I disagree with.

There was an external link I placed on the page a year ago for a rescue organization. The link has been there virtually since the inception of the page, so I guess I am a bit confused why you would suddenly think that it should be removed.

I understand WP:NOT, but I going to replace the link for two reaons: 1) It is informative and 2) Its been there for almost a year and a half. I do not think that 2 links is a problem.

Roodog2k [[User_talk:Roodog2k | (Hello there!)]] 19:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Min Pin, part 2

I would disagree, only because if a rescue organization is large and notable, I do not see why it cannot be included. I understand that things change over time. I guess that I am not quite following what you're saying. :(

Roodog2k [[User_talk:Roodog2k | (Hello there!)]] 20:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to Raw feeding article editing advice

Thanks for taking the time to write an explanation of your editorial policy. The article that I first edited appeared to be exclusively angled at dog feeders and excessively biased towards processed feed manufacturers. Now that you have explained that it is "controversial" it will need much more attention and work to even begin to contain a fair picture of the amount of spin that is put out by manufacturers against any form of feeding except their own product.

The Salon.com article is an op ed that appears to have been undertaken for "colour". Do you seriously consider that a quote mined with third party references is worth throwing in? I can produce ten times these within a few minutes. But will they increase understanding of the basic "nutrition" argument? Your selected quote really says nothing more than that the British vet association agrees that there are dangers in feeding raw food. It doesn't say that other forms of feeding are NOT dangerous. And it doesn't say that raw feeding cannot be accomplished safely. Take the quote down please.

Two questions: Do you derive income from dog training, breeding?

                        Do you derive income from a pet feed manufacturer?

I am an Australian and you will have to allow for cultural differences in the approach to feeding animals that I may inject into the article.

Moving discussion to Talk:Raw feeding. Elf | Talk 20:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

extra question on Raw feeding editing

Can you explain why some .com external references are ok to include and why others are not?

The explanation should have some basis in where a .com site gets its income from. Thanks.

extra on Raw feeding editing

No, I'm not tired - Ha!

The previous 2 articles in your talk list, plus this one are my own work

````

Min Pin part 3

OK, I reread what you said. I think we're crossing wires on this conversation, b/c your page keeps changing after I type something. :P

I placed the link there not to endorse the rescue effort per se, rather to 1) demonstrate that it exists and 2) providing alternate breed information. You have to excuse me today, as I just retured from vacation and have been nicotine free for 5 days, so I'm a little frayed. That rescue group provides some breed information.

Also, I try to get on Wikipedia as often as possible to see how this page and a few others are doing. Sadly, my job frowns heavily on Wikipeida work, and I have little time to devote to Wikipedia at home b/c of family obligations. So, if vandalism has appeared on this page for any stretch of time and I missed it, my apologies.

Roodog2k [[User_talk:Roodog2k | (Hello there!)]]

Edits

Thanks for the edits.--Counsel 21:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunting Dog

Think those were too long? You made me stay up late; how can I pass up a hunting dog article that needs attention?!--Counsel 07:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SR 85

The proposed move was to California State Highway 85, not to State Route 85 (California). The latter fits disambiguation conventions, as there is no such thing as "California State Route 85". --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 22:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Black dog

Sorry about that. Is that your dog? It looks identical to my dog. Do you have any other photos? Toertn 22:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Hey there--It looks to me as if you've around on Wikipedia long enough to have encountered disambiguation pages and to have read the manual of style page on disambiguation pages, so I'm not sure why you keep futzing with the Martingale page to make it nonstandard. It's just a disambiguation page; there's nothing special about the introductory phrase that needs nonstandard formatting or phrasing. If you're annoyed because it's no longer the primary page about a mathematical topic, I'm sorry. It's still just a standard disambiguation page. Elf | Talk 00:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why must disambiguation pages be a special exception to the standard rule that if one writes about a word, rather than using the word to write about what it refers to, then one italicizes it? That rule is stated in Wikipedia:Manual of Style and I think in the Chicago Manual of Style. Michael Hardy 00:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elf

Hello Elf, I could certainly use the support of an administrator for my admin nomination. One more admin helping the dog project would be a good thing -:) Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nomination cabal/SirIsaacBrock Cordially SirIsaacBrock 23:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message rec'd... check out the article I just wrote Monkey-baiting SirIsaacBrock 22:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i am sorry for our conflict on the dobermann section, but i refuse to back down from the truth, the truth is more important than pleasing the public, wouldn't you agree

Dog ancestry'

Opinion request: I notice the dog article has a section on the ancestory of the dog as a wolf. Do you feel it might be time to create a separate article Origins of the dog or of similiar title? Cordially SirIsaacBrock 17:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will respond on Talk:Dog. Elf | Talk 20:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your wikibreak

Your wikibreak is about like my wikibreak :) - Trysha ^(talk) 09:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caps

Thanks for the correction. In one of my books the author (Charles Fergus) asserts that only references to proper nouns should be capitalized in breed names i.e. Boykin spaniel or Labrador retriever or poodle. I was about to ask a question about it on the dog project as I could not find a Wikipedia policy. I will stick with the caps from here on in.--Counsel 23:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I think the capitalization is better. When it is lowercase it catches your eye as being out of place. I think the Wikipolicy is the right way to go. BTW I worried abouot disturbing you Wikibreak by working on the dog pages :)--Counsel 01:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No sympathy here. I am a FL boy in Spokane. It is cold!

PD

I think the release is the right way to go. I am going to make the switch.

page move discussion

Hi! There's a page move discussion going on at Talk:State Route 2 (California) that you may be interested in. Thanks, Gentgeen 08:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interested?

Being the only other person in the Wikipedians by alma mater category for SCU, I thought you might be interested in the userbox I just made, {{user SCU}}:

This user is a student at or graduate of Santa Clara University

Dave Runger 22:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

random cute dog note

Hi! Your dogs r soooooooooooooo cute! I don't have any pets:(--Divya da animal lvr 20:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dobermann

it's not point of view it's matter of fact it happens all the time to me or anyone else with a dobermann, in England the official name is black and tanned and i didn't put half of the stuff on there so leave me alone.

Hawaiian Poi Dog

Excuse me, but I beg to differ. The Hawaiian Poi Dog is a breed, not a mix. It has a set type, and should be considered a breed. True, modern mixed breeds in Hawaii today are called Hawaiian Poi Dogs, but there was a true pure breed at one time, which people even tried to reconstruct, but failed. Why do you think it is a just a mix? Vortex 05:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dog's photos

Could you give your dog's photos to commons? Thanks Pleple2000 14:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming the "Kelpie_(dog)" page

G'day Elf. I noticed you undid my rename of the Kelpie article the other day. OK (remembering that I don't own the page!), I confess that I didn't open the discussion on the List_of_Dog_Breeds, but I did propose it on the Kelpie Talk page, back in April. Obviously, nobody now reads that page...

I have opened a proposal on the LDB page, using my original arguments, and adding rebuttals to your edit summary. Basically, the ANKC represents only show Kelpies, which by definition are not Kelpies -- the argument is that Kelpies (as represented by the WKC) were bred as working dogs where conformation was, is and never will be important, and the name has never included the word "Australian". I should mention that the WKC (the primary authority on the breed) does not use the adjective "Australian" anywhere. The term "Australian Kelpie" is of UK origin, back when Australia was a British colony, and crept into the FIC from England. Further, looking at the "Maltese_(dog)" naming convention, there are only two uses of the word Kelpie, the other being a malevolent Celtic water spirit. Taking things to their illogical extreme, one might insist that the Poodle be renamed "French Poodle", or the Shi-Tzu to "Chinese Shi-Tzu"... Gordon | Talk, 22 June 2006 @06:45 UTC

Sorry Elf, LDB=List of Dog Breeds :) I've also made a suggestion/proposal in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dog_breeds/Templates to address the kennel club/breed standard question -- it's hidden in the "Dog Registries" section, about halfway down. I think I will sub-section it there so people can notice it. Gordon | Talk, 24 June 2006 @02:35 UTC

Hi Elf -- I've just copied the relevant part of your reply to the rename proposal on List of Dog Breeds. Gordon | Talk, 2 July 2006 @05:49 UTC

Rabbit agility

Hi. I saw you've recently contributed to Dog agility. Can you take a look at Rabbit agility and Rabbit hopping and let me know if 1) they are real and 2) they belong in Wikipedia? Thanks in advance. GRBerry 22:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I wanted to be sure this wasn't just something made up in school one day, and you have established that. GRBerry 15:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:WritersCramp appears to be back

Greetings Elf, after reviewing this RfC about User:WritersCramp I thought you should be aware of this WP:ANI report concerning User:SirIsaacBrock and his new sockpuppet User:Porky Pig. Thanks. (→Netscott) 23:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh look he has a perma-block. - Trysha ^(talk) 21:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping me posted, folks. Elf | Talk 16:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Puppy

Thank you so much for getting the article off to a good start! I honestly didn't know where to begin. The_Irrelevant_One 11:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Technical communicator vocation?

I noticed your addition to Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Technical Communicators and I'm curious what your vocation is and/or how you would define "technical communicator." I would love to have a full-time job editing sites like Wikipedia; do you know of any avenues that would make this a possibility for me? I'm watching this page, so you can reply here. --J. J. 23:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Technical communicator: Someone who conveys information about technology to its consumers. That's pretty broad, intentionally. "Technical writer" would be the traditional name, but there's so much more involved than writing. I suppose that if I knew of a full-time job editing pages like Wikipedia, I'd be doing it myself. :-) Some companies use wikis as an internal tool for various things and so sometimes I get to muck around on a wiki site, but only as it relates directly to the work I'm supposed to be doing, which often involves a variety of media and an awful lot of figuring out what questions to ask, ferreting out answers, determining which info is going to be of use, and choosing how best to convey it to be most helpful to the intended audience.

Having a technical background is very helpful; technical tech writers always seem to be in great demand, at least in and around Silicon Valley. I slowly morphed from being a software developer to being a tech communicator because I could write and I liked solving the puzzles the one needs to solve as a tech communicator. So I was always writing or rewriting stuff in my role as computer scientist, so when someone would ask me for writing samples, I had stuff I could show and talk about. I learned most about effective tech communication, however, when I started working with other writers and editors, taking a few university extension classes on the subject, attending STC conferences and workshops, and reading books (and STC member proceedings & magazines) on how to do a better job. In theory, you can network at STC meetings & events, too, to meet people & maybe find leads on jobs or directions to take or get involved in STC so that other people get to know you & your work. I've never done that.

Hope this helps. Elf | Talk 01:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely helps to know about the STC. I'll likely return in a few weeks and let you know what's panned out for me! --J. J. 14:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Wow! Thank you very much for the barnstar. It is indeed hard at times, I get flamed and yelled at, but it is good to know that my work is appriciated! Trysha ^(talk) 22:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:ChowBlueTongueUkapala.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ChowBlueTongueUkapala.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Sherool (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:BrittanySpanielMrwill.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BrittanySpanielMrwill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Sherool (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on "The Prestige" (film)

Elf, you noted that the plot summary of The Prestige needs more work. The reason it needs more work is that we had a clear, coherent, accurate, and grammatical plot summary a few days ago, but Wiki-newbie undid it and restored his version of the section, which the one of a few days ago had replaced. The section has a contentious history on the article's talk page. Some of us had explained to Wiki-newbie what we saw as flaws in his rewrite, and he put it back (or something close to it) anyway.

I'm new to Wikipedia, and I don't know all the procedures and etiquette, but it seems to me there's something wrong with ignoring tactful feedback from multiple contributors and insisting on one's own version when good reasons have been given for not using it. Can you help? Cognita 04:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DMCA Takedown

I was wondering whether you'd like to send a DMCA takedown notice about Caninecrib. They didn't respond to your last notice. I've added the address (legal@crystaltech.com) of the host to the entry. There's a DMCA template at Wikipedia:Standard_GFDL_violation_letter#PD_DMCA_takedown_notices. Superm401 - Talk 00:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Westie.JPG at West Highland White Terrier.

Hi. As a significant contributor to the page in question, you are invited to this page to give your opinion on the inclusion or exclusion of Image:Westie.JPG in the article West Highland White Terrier. The specific criteria being examined appear to be:

its suitability on quality grounds; and
whether it is deemed of sufficient quality, is it more deserving of being shown than other images currently contained within the article, bearing in mind that another issue might be the limitation on including too many images in the article.

Your comments are eagerly awaited. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat) 19:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dogs?

I put them there because they are so similar to Germany and they even use German for official language. Maybe i should rename it to "Germanic" ? -- Hrödberäht 05:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with website sourcing

Headphonos has been removing sourcing notices from the bull dog type breeds. Such as Bully Kutta, Gull dong and Gull Terr. Headphonos suggests that the website molosserdogs is a reliable one, I was under the impression that it was not a reliable source. Can you give me your opinion on this please? Ensyc 11:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Image:P3030054 Hail crwb.jpg

Image restored...please add information. Bastiq▼e ^demandez 03:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Elf | Talk 05:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Image:Labrador Retriever (Chocolate Puppy).jpg

If you don't visit your commons talk page you might wanna forward your talk page to your en talk page. Anyway, could you please verify you took that picture. If you did, just replace {{GFDL}} with {{GFDL-user-en}} on the image page. Thanks, Yonatan (contribs/talk) 03:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rottweiler

Jesus what a mess! yes, I didn't notice the second duplicate until it was too late. I re-uploaded both the photos under new versions with unique filenames. If only people would do the proper thing and upload to Commons in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem. What a pain in the ass. thank you for the tips VanTucky 04:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know scut work like that isn't fun, but it's doubly not fun for the users who have to go around cleaning up the messes. VanTucky 04:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catahoula Leopard Dog

I used such language only after that user repeatedly reverted to their image without a single comment. Simple reversion of images that have been objected to as unacceptable multiple times isn't simple edit warring, it's a form of vandalism as defined on WP:Vandalism as: "Image vandalism Uploading shock images, inappropriately placing explicit images on pages, or simply using any image in ways that are disruptive." After assuming good faith in that the user wanted to improve the article with their image rather than misuse Wikipedia as a personal gallery, and then having my efforts at explaining policy reasonably rejected without discussion, leaves me no choice but to warn a user against vandalism. Furthermore, if you look at the user's contributions, you can see that they have done nothing on Wikipedia but upload their pet picture and place it in the "appropriate" article. I could have definitely have used softer language the first time around, but it's hard to be kind when I meet a new user who has done this exact same thing every week. I often place welcome templates and answer questions from new users, but I have zero patience for those who think Wikipedia is here to be a personal pet gallery and never make an effort at contributing factual content even to the articles for their own dog's breed. VanTucky 22:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the fact that they did nothing else but add a photo of their pet to Wikipedia is exactly my point. VanTucky 06:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Aussie

Do you still want that red aussie photo in the article? it is a quality photo and it is good to have a closer image of a working-line aussie to compare it with the much different show lines. I'd be happy to place it in the article. VanTucky 22:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Article References

Could you add some references to the information you provided for the Judge Article of Wikipedia? Thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksuwildcats10 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addiction

Looks like your addiction is back. (comment by User:Chessy999 on August 28, 2007; hosed by my failure to close a "nowiki" command. Elf | Talk 23:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Bogatyr (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bogatyr (disambiguation), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.academickids.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Bogatyr. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on Talk:Bogatyr (disambiguation). Elf | Talk 23:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Talk:Bogatyr. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. This is not a big deal, as it was just a disambiguation page. But attribution is important. If moving content without cut-and-paste seems too complex, just ask an administrator. That's what we're here for. Cheers! — madman bum and angel 05:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you looked at Talk:Bogatyr, you'd notice that I moved only one section from that page to a new page of its own. I left lots of breadcrumbs in the talk and summary sections so that the history of that section could be traced--but there is no way with which I'm familiar that you can move just one section from one page and only the edit history associated with that one section. You either have to move the whole thing and then copy & paste the other sections back into a new page, or you have to copy and paste that section into a new page and leave the rest where it was. Leastwise, that's the way it has worked in the 4 years I've been doing wikpedia admin tasks. But if there is now a facility for figuring out what history goes with what section of a page and by some magic moving only one section, I'd love to know where the instructions are. Thanks for your concern. Elf | Talk 01:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elf!

Just lost my message--oh, the joys of dial up! Replied briefly at my Come run your mouth page Quill 06:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AmStaff: Why all the questions?

I understand that everyone has an opinion on the topic of American Staffordshire Terriers. Here's mine. I have a 10 month old AmStaff AND a 4 year old child. I am about sick to death of all of the nasty looks and snide comments about my dog and it's potential threat to my family. If you have taken on the responsibility of owning a canine then you had better take complete responsibility on the way it behaves and reacts with people and other animals. If you neglect, abuse, or degrade your dog (OF ANY BREED!) it will react in a negative way. IF you beat your child severely while its growing up are your shocked when that child becomes aggressive or fearful of humans? Come on people. . . . . use your heads. I have owned a male German Shepherd, Rot-mix, now my little Dakota (AMSTAFF). . . . .I am proud to call them one of my family. Never once has a person gotten bit, hell. . . if another dog get agressive with them mine always slinks away with the cuts and nips. Treat your animals with respect. Granted there are always those freak accidents, but if Pitt Bull bites only make up about 18% of all reported aggravated dog bites. . . . who does the other 82% make up? I'm just so tired of the comments on how I am a bad mother just because of my choice in a puppy. Dakota plays hide and seek, tag, and doesn't EVER let my son out of her sight. Be responsible parents and you have nothing to worry about. I had my face bitten into and a chunk taken out of my lip by a lab when I was 5. . . . you don't see me verbaly pissing on them when one walks by. Respect your neighbors animals, they are part of the family too. I wouldn't give my brindle baby up for the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Principessa cjb (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

I tagged an image you uploaded the commons as an (unintentional) copyvio. See your talk page there. Garion96 (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian cattle dog

Is Bo a male or a female? I can't tell whether that's a doodle on its belly or just tummy fluff. I want to caption the pic in the article. If it's a he, then it has a very gentle face. Some of the red Heelers that I've known have been among the worst tempered dogs this side of the planet. Amandajm (talk) 23:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filled in "male" on the image description page. I don't know Bo all that well, but he does compete off-leash in agility around other dogs, and his handler is a junior handler (i.e., not adult), so he can't be that bad, says here. Elf | Talk 00:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Native American Indian Dog

Hello, I was wondering if you'd care to check out an AfD nomination: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native American Indian Dog. Thanks! --Pesco (talk) 06:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

There is a discussion going on about whether or not to merge WikiProject Dogs and WikiProject Dog breeds together. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Coaster1983 (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed Breed Dog Clubs of America

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Mixed Breed Dog Clubs of America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request

I saw your name at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. For spite house, please photograph the Alameda Spite House, located at Broadway & Crist St, Alameda, CA 94501.[5] This shows a suggested photo angle. GregManninLB (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

California photo requests now by County

I just spent the past few days moving all the California photo requests into County categories to make it easier for photographers to locate requests in the locations where they take photos. Please consider monitoring and adding your name to the list at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Francisco County, California and the other northern counties. GregManninLB (talk) 21:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AustrKelpieLiver2 wb.jpg

Fixed--prob was anon vandalism removing text.

Spam in Socialize

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Socialize, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Socialize is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Socialize, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, just checked now, and by some magic it remains just a redirect to socialization the way I created it 3 years ago. So I guess it has been fixed... Elf | Talk 04:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dock jumping

Hi Great job on the agility article. I recently started a page about Dock jumping, if you would be so kind as to take a look (even though it is a work in progress) and maybe give some hints to make it better. gd8man 05:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Entlebucher

Hi Elf,

Today I was looking in the Dutch Wikipedia and found your picture of the Entlebucher Sennenhund. Although Max has got all the looks of a nice Entlebucher there is one thing missing... His tail. Either cut or born with a short tail Max doesn't meet the nowadays breed standard. All Entlebuchers should have a long tail having at least some white hair at the tip. Cutting is not allowed anymore and dogs born with a short tail are not allowed for breeding.

If you like you could use one of the nice pictures of our male Entlebucher called Seppl (which is Swiss for little Joe).

Best regards,

Rob Smeets
Haverbeekstraat 1
NL-6102 VZ Echt (Slek)
The Netherlands
N51° 05.203' E05° 53.103'
Phone: +31 (0)651065844
Skype phone: icarus7757
info@icarussolutions.nl www.icarussolutions.nl

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.164.179.176 (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I haven't done any editing on the Dutch Wikipedia, as I don't speak the language. You can either upload your photo and insert it into the article yourself, or contact someone who has edited the dutch wikipedia page (you can look at the page history for some usernames of people who have worked on it). Elf | Talk 09:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dog breed mergers

Hi, I was doing some work on List of dog breeds and I stumbled across a discussion from March 2006, which you participated in, regarding a proposed merge of East German Shepherd Dog with German Shepherd Dog. Nothing was ever done re the proposal but I still feel the articles should be merged and I have applied the tags on both articles to indicate this. Just letting you know incase you have an opinion to share on the matter. Take care, ~ Ameliorate _{U T C} @ 23:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I about to propose a merge for German Spitz as well, only to find you proposed the same thing 2 years ago as well. I have revived that discussion also. ~ Ameliorate _{U T C} @ 00:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Istrian Hound

A tag has been placed on Istrian Hound, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon Valley picture

Your Image:AlumRockViewSiliconValley w.jpg seems to be fairly popular. It also contains some artificats where pictures were stitched together. I was wondering if you still have the original pictures and if you'd be interested in a new (hopefully improved) version. Rl (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, a larger resolution version would make a good desktop image. Thanks for all, from a fellow Silicon Valley native who has spent plenty of time around Alum Rock. Petershank (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remerged & uploaded somewhat larger version. Elf | Talk 01:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thank you. Rl (talk) 05:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:ScytheUser fx wb.png

Image:ScytheUser fx wb.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Scythe user.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Scythe user.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:BedlingtonTerriers wb.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Bedlington Terriers.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MontaVista quad 1971 fx.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MontaVista quad 1971 fx.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Elf,

We are very interested in using your picture of "Brandy Mae" the Parson Russell Terrier, for an illustration in a magazine in the UK.

Please contact me at m.batel@hotmail.com as soon as you can and I could give you more details as we would need a Hi-Res version of it.

Thank you.

Kind regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luxurypublishing (talk • contribs) 10:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: de-orphaning Library of Congress lists continued

I don't have a preference on the orphan status of these. I suggest taking it up with Avocado who is the one who wanted the tags restored. I updated the bot behavior based upon his request as a bot (generally) shouldn't override an editor's wishes. Let me know if you have more questions. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Congress Orphans

If you think this class of articles should be exempt form the orphanage criteria, would you please bring it up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orphanage? Thanks! -- Avocado (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle, twinkle, little star

...how I wonder how you are? Just popped in and sayin' hi. Quill (talk) 04:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ligature_drawing.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ligature_drawing.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Dog photos task force

Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Dog photos task force, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Dog photos task force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Dog photos task force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:MemVietnamMemKids.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MemVietnamMemKids.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cute dogs

Beautiful dogs! My mixed breed pup is on my user page.THD3 (talk) 13:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elf,

Please post the picture of the Disneyland Train 2 on the Disneyland railroad page. Thanks!218.186.12.203 (talk) 02:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IrishJack

FYI: I referenced an old edit summary of yours relating to IrishJack at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IrishJack. Rd232 ^talk 18:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reqbreedphoto

Hi -- I noticed that you are the editor who originally wrote the {{reqbreedphoto}} template. I wanted to let you know that I've posted a proposal to deprecate {{reqbreedphoto}} in favor of {{reqphoto}}. I don't mean any disrespect to your work by this -- I have just found that consolidating unnecessary photo templates makes it easier to organize the huge mass of "Wikipedia requested photographs" categories, and it simplifies writing bots to do some of the grunt work. Please see the proposal at Template talk:Reqbreedphoto for more information. Thanks for your time. Tim Pierce (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert vandalism listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Revert vandalism. Since you had some involvement with the Revert vandalism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Webster6^{Yo, So} 14:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Labrador Retriever at Peer review

Labrador Retriever is up at peer review, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/Labrador Retriever/archive1. Cirt (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

School images categories

Regarding the comment attached to this edit: "(Category:School images -- oh, man, OK, this is a ball of worms that I can't do now. Many school images, few in this category--which really needs subcategories (e.g., "Images of school logos").)"
Yes, it would be nice if someone else sorted it out, wouldn't it!
I'm happy to contribute to tasks on a workplan, but otherwise would like to avoid ALL administrative tedium. Just drop me a line if/when you want/need help. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, mostly I don't do wikipedia any more because it just sucks up my time when I get started. So I dare not start again. :-) Elf | Talk 23:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blast from the past!

Why hello! I've just now noticed a note you left on my talk page five(!) years ago. Anyhow, thanks for the effort, and sorry that I abandoned things for a bit. In any case, I've left a response there. Cheers! Dairiki | Talk 05:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.64.242.22 (talk) [reply]

WikiProject Dogs/Dog Breeds Task Force question

I felt you would be the best person to ask this question, so I hope you don't mind. I would like to participate in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs and I was wondering how I join up. Mokoniki 15:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok, thank you! Oh you're welcome. The edits can be quite ridiculous. ;) Mokoniki | talk 00:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WaltAndMickeyfx wb.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WaltAndMickeyfx wb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Optigan13 (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask for your permission of the use of the photo "Image:SanJoseDowntownIMG016elf wb.jpg"

I cannot find a method to contact you so I give a comment here. I would like to illustrate the photo in my work of a stamp sheetlet. The stamp sheetlet is my entry of a competition. The competition is “Stamp Sheetlet Design Competition in Honour of Professor Charles Kao's Being Awarded the Nobel Prize”, which organizing by Hong Kong Science Museum. The main aim of this competition is to commemorate Professor Charles Kao's being awarded the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physics for his groundbreaking achievements in fibre optics communication. I would like to make use of this photo because Professor Kao lives in Silicon Valley now. I find this photo is very suitable for my work so I hope I can get your approval of using this photo. This photo would not be used for making any profit and I really hope that I can have your permission of the use of it. Many thanks for reading my comment and I am looking forward to seeing your reply. Yukiling (talk) 11:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond on your talk page. Elf | Talk 20:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Elf! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Susan Fry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Elf. You have new messages at WP:EAR.
Message added 17:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question you had on translation

Hi, I posted at Talk:Shooting Star (Modern Talking song). --CliffC (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pit Bull

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pit Bull. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pit Bull. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2009 Vote

Please see here and here Krinkle (talk) 22:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Great, and please look what the [edit] button does next time (tho I should have substituted the template, my bad!) [6]. Krinkle (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Old English (Anglo-Saxon) surnames

A tag has been placed on List of Old English (Anglo-Saxon) surnames requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SnottyWong ^gab 23:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Elf. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc Talk 08:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Playground

Wikipedia:WikiProject Playground, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Playground and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Playground during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 19:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:189600 5558PleatedShadeAkkia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:189600 5558PleatedShadeAkkia.jpg, which you've sourced to Akkia. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 06:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FoothillOwlMascot fxIMG 1309wb.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FoothillOwlMascot fxIMG 1309wb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]