User talk:Elephant2019

Speedy deletion nomination of Primary (game)

Hello Elephant2019,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Primary (game) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Primary (game)

Hello Elephant2019,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Primary (game) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding {{Year article header}} to articles. This is making breaking changes. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Decadebox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't make changes to templates unless you know what you're doing. Your changes broke the template, which is used by many other articles. If you need help, you can ask at the Help Desk or at WP:VPT. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to User:MikutronixX3535

Hi Elephant2019. I'm a little curious as to why you're editing the user page of MikutronixX3535. Generally, editors don't edit the user page of another editor, but when they do it's usually for a good policy or guideline based reason like here or here. Your edits, however, seem to be adding content to the page as if you're working on a draft for a new article or an improvement to an existing article. Is there some connection be you and MikutronixX3535? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Elephant2019. You haven't clarified why you continue to edit User:MikutronixX3535 or whether you have any connection to that account. The content on User:MikutronixX3535 was moved to User:MikutronixX3535/sandbox by an editor named JJMC89 because a user sandbox more appropriate than a user page for working on drafts, article improvements, test edits, etc. User pages need to comply with Wikipedia:User pages and what you're doing on MikutronixX3535's user page is starting to look more and more like a violation of Wikipedia:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages? and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site even more so since it's not your user page you're editing. If you continue to do such things without at least trying to explain why, then not only is MikutronixX3535's user page likely going to be tagged for deletion per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#U5. Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host, but also you're editing contributions may more closely examined by an administrator. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Large Egg Error.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Large Egg Error.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Large Egg Error.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Large Egg Error.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Large Egg Error.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Large Egg Error.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded this file twice before to Wikipedia and once to Commons as File:LargeEggError.jpg, and it has been deleted each time by three different administrators as a copyright violation. It was deleted from Commons by Túrelio on November 4, so you uploaded it to Wikipedia. It was then deleted from Wikipedia by Jimfbleak also on November 4, so you uploaded it again only to be deleted for that same reason by RHaworth on November 10. If you're not sure why the file keeps being deleted, then you should ask for assistance at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Your continuous editing of another's user page is starting to become an issue as explained above in #Edits to User:MikutronixX3535, but there is pretty much zero tolerance for repeated copyright violations. You cannot upload any photos/images that you don't hold copyright ownership over to Wikipedia under a free license without the copyright holder giving their explicit consent that it's OK for you to do so. It's OK to make a mistake like this once, maybe even twice; continuing to do so, however, is likely going to lead to an administrator stepping in and taking action to prevent any further disruption. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, I'm just picking up on the ping above. Elephant2019, you seem to be making far too many edits in violation of our rules, I've just deleted two more pages as Not web host. If you don't understand why you are having problems, ask. Otherwise it will be assumed that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia, and you will be blocked on that basis. I'll follow this with a formal warning. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The One Billion Survivor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The One Billion Survivor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The One Billion Survivor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The One Billion Survivor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The One Billion Survivor

Hello, Elephant2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The One Billion Survivor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IPod Touch (4th generation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shrek (franchise), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shrek (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I fail to see how a fake trailer is in any way notable enough for inclusion. If you feel otherwise, please discuss at the article's Talk page, or provide at least one source that discussed it. DonIago (talk) 20:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lego City, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]