User talk:ElectronCompound

Welcome!

Hello, ElectronCompound!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, --WikiLinuz {talk} 19:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tusi (drug) has been accepted

Tusi (drug), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 18:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ElectronCompound. Thank you for your work on Tusi (drug). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rest of World (website) (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rest of World (website) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElectronCompound! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Recreational use of nitrous oxide, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See WP:RELATED:

Disambiguation hatnotes are intended to link to separate topics that could be referred to by the same title, of the article or any of its redirects. They are not intended to link to topics that are simply related to each other [...]

Belbury (talk) 07:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thoroughly disagree with your assessment that the inclusion of these links is inconsistent with the Manual of Style. The purpose of these WP:RELATED is not merely to connect related topics, but rather to redirect users to the most appropriate and relevant articles for their needs. If you examine the links for Nitrous oxide and Nitrous oxide (medication), you will find that they all have WP:RELATED to guide readers to the specific content they are seeking. ElectronCompound (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes are all about rerouting the reader to the article they were really looking for. WP:HAT says that they should Mention other topics and articles only if there is a reasonable possibility of a reader arriving at the article either by mistake or with another topic in mind.

Having nitrous oxide disambiguate to the connected recreational use of nitrous oxide is useful because that's probably the most common association for the concept of nitrous oxide, right now. A lot of readers who type "nitrous oxide" into a Wikipedia or Google search will be specifically looking for information on its recreational use, rather than its chemistry and its use in combustion. So we give them a hatnote link to immediately let them know that we have a full article on the subject they were looking for.

Unless there are some redirects in play, a reader who has arrived at Recreational use of nitrous oxide won't have been looking for non-recreational articles about the gas or its medicinal usage. They may certainly be interested in clicking through to read about those other angles, but they weren't the topic they had in mind. They arrived at the right article. Belbury (talk) 09:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]