User talk:EhsanQ

Welcome!

Hello, EhsanQ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Anupam^Talk 06:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Masiela Lusha

Thank you so much for your speedy reply regarding Masiela Lusha's article here in Wikipedia.

I am certain at this point that there isn't another soul on the planet, besides her own mother, who could have up-to-date news on her career and recent literary developments. As her Agent, it gets rather difficult to convince producers of her origin when your news here on Wikipedia links directly to other sources. Also, if a fan decides she's 5'8 when in fact she's only 5'4... that right away translates to her IMDB, and soon I find myself working harder to explain the truth.

I understand the process of deleting a page, but I hope you're not referring to deleting her page here on Wiki. Are you in fact considering deleting Masiela's page, or is this a way to prevent outsiders from altering information that is already proven?

Thank you again Ehsan. I appreciate your courteous response.

Kindest Regards,

Aaronweinhaus (talk) 05:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Aaron

Indian Surnames etc

Hi. I wasn't trying to offend - what I was stating was that two categories should not be subcategories of each other, as that implies that they're both the same thing - in which case, there should be no need for two categories. It doesn't actually make sense. It's saying that 'A' forms part of 'B;, but also that 'B' forms part of 'A', which doesn't make sense. it doesn't matter whether this refers to Indian names or types of asteroid - the idea is that categories should not overlap this way.CultureDrone (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Masiela Lusha

There isn't a reason to question her notability given that she has quite a few published articles this past year, as well as an official website at www.MasielaLusha.com.

Also, I have every intention on using other sources but after a full day of attempting to learn the process, I found it too difficult and can't seem to help you in any way... though I wish I could.

I have one more question. Why haven't my changes been made visible under the google search>wiki? It still mentions that she lived in Georgia (which is false)

Aaron

Aaronweinhaus (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Problems/Masiela Lusha (copied here)

You wrote:

Wikipedia's problems are simple (a) nobody should tell lies, so every statement should be verifiable from a good place. (b) If concerns are raised then every article should go under a 5 day review to decide if it is a notable person to have an article. (c) that some persons who create articles need to be outside our the editorial process. Those issue are raised in Wikipedia Conflict of Interest.

Wikipedia is very much about lots and lots of people editoring an article which new ideas or new information.

My personal idea is to let the five day deletion process decide whether or not it should be included in Wikipedia or not and I will raise it on 10th May. If it is decided it is notable then a standard dates of birth etc will be included otherwise it will be deleted.

You should not be wasting people's time at AfD. You should have done some research on your own to verify your opinion, and thus discovered the references needed. This actress is clearly notable, which doesn't mean important, just noticed. AfD is too crowded to test your theories. As an experienced editor you could have helped the newbie to learn the ropes. --Kevin Murray (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

• Notwithstanding my comments above, Aaron told you above that he is her agent. That changes things. He should not be creating or editing the article due to COI. However, I have warned him and have begun the process to clean up the article. --Kevin Murray (talk) 21:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the tip-off about the copy of my user page; I don't know what's going on with it but it's definitely dodgy. Sam Blacketer (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

US City articles

User:Rambot, an automatic program run by User:Ram-Man updates all of the U.S. city article on a regular basis. It has been running for about 6 years or so. Updating population data for cities from the official Census department data is fairly repetitive and non-controversial work. I am not sure what the beef it there... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I never said that RamBot adjusted the figures. I suggested that you, if you want to, should adjust the order of the figures to your own liking. There was no deliberate attempt to order the figures in an overtly racist manner by listing "white" people first. The simple fact is that all RamBot did was to take a data-dump from the U.S. Census Bureau's own databases and put it into the articles on U.S. cities. If the U.S. Census Bureau reported white people first all the time, then that is why it is the way it is on the City articles. It would certainly be more logical to reorder the figures to place them in order of percentages. If you would like to do so, feel free. No one is stopping you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello EhsangQ , sorry I mangled that page

"Template RFC list" ( whatever it be ). I'm new on WP , & I did as usual when we want to ask a question on the french WP  : find the apropriate forum - (history) , modify the page , & write the question .It was about "the voyage of George Anson around the world" , I want to translate it into French  : "thanks to the author - can I add a page about Juan-Fernandez Islands - does he think many sailors died of tuberculosis ?". Can you redirect my question ? Thanks & apologies Hmmm ,and am I in the right place now ? ...( Nice photo you got , man ... - I was in Britain in the sixties ...) --Arapaima (talk) 21:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your answer , EhsangQ ,

it was certainly saturday night exhaustion ( not intoxication , I'm a teatotaller , a rarity here in France ) after much typing about Anson's voyage . I gather your family is from Afghanistan , or do I blunder again ? I have a friend who has been a french doctor in Kabul , 35 or 40 years ago , he told me what a lot of fine people the Afghani were ...Fare well , young friend , & God help us all to find peace & prosperity . --Arapaima (talk) 07:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Salman Rushdie

Hi there, I did as you said and triedd to put http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bookshow/stories/2007/2092789.htm in the Salman rushdie page bit still can't get an Edit tab to do this in. what am I doing wrong? Sabina77

Thanks, I did as you suggested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabina77 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Isabella Banks

Hi, this edit of yours removed sourced information from an article but the edit summary ("journalist v ournalist (1chr)") doesn't seem to explain why. May I ask what was the thinking behind the removal? Nev1 (talk) 00:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

User page

Your user page seems to have some broken <ref> syntax in it! --Deryck C. 14:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aneel Ahmad page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EhsanQ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''[[User:EhsanQ|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Navy">EhsanQ</font>]]''' '''''[[User_talk:EhsanQ|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]''''' : EhsanQ ^(talk)

to

'''[[User:EhsanQ|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:Navy">EhsanQ</span>]]''' '''''[[User talk:EhsanQ|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]''''' : EhsanQ ^(talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EhsanQ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:EhsanQ.jpg

The file File:EhsanQ.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal picture.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)