Jump to content

User talk:EggRoll97/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Filter 812 modification

Hi EggRoll, don't know if you've seen it, but I pinged you for a filter change at EFR. Thanks Nobody (talk) 13:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

@1AmNobody24: Yep. Noticed it at the time, just didn't have a chance to respond in the moment. I've implemented it now and noted as such on EFR. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Admin election advice

Hi EggRoll, while looking through the admin election candidates, I saw your name. Your work in areas like edit filtering is truly appreciated, so I am inclined to support later this month. However, it is my understanding that you have never created a mainspace article besides shifting existing content after move requests and reviving edits erroneously blocked by a filter. Similarly, you have never edited a mainspace article at least 10 times and mostly edit them to revert vandalism. While these are valued efforts, I agree with User:Ritchie333/Why admins should create content that all candidates should have first-hand experience with article creation. I am not a stickler to the idea that admins should have at least 10K edits, but without significant article writing, this issue may sink your candidacy.

You are probably a specialist in at least one area that could have new articles created or existing articles improved, but if you want topic ideas, consider WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Redlist index, which lists redlinks for women deserving of articles sorted by various characteristics. Given the time between now and the start of discussion/voting, I think you still have an opportunity to really strengthen your candidacy! ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 18:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Seen and appreciated. Thanks! (Side note: I did create Contraband Police, though it needs some work..) EggRoll97 (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

What's with edit filter 1,298?

So, I've noticed that my AbuseFilter log is just absolutely flooded with entries because of this filter. In my case it's pretty misleading because I use either WP:CAPRICORN or, lately, the page curation tool to add tags manually afterwards, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who does so so that they don't have to remember every type of rcat. Are you aware of anybody who actually looks for redirects to categorize via this filter? It seems like a very inefficient way to go about doing so, and I'm not sure that this filter is actually useful, so I thought I'd reach out about it. I imagine a query of some kind, using relevant criteria, would be much more efficient and would be less likely to clog up the Special:AbuseLog. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: It was originally requested at EFR, and was intended to catch redirects like Chard Parkway railway station, Ngog, Gerónimo, Douglas Mahonga Buti, and similar. Your point is valid though that it also unintentionally catches redirects where Capricorn and similar tools are used to categorize the redirect after the original redirect edit. Looking through the AbuseLog, I don't think it's been used very much, though it may be best to check with User:Geardona and others in the discussion about current usage. Personally it seems not to have ended up used for the original intent, since a lot of old redirects remain uncategorized, so I don't have any objections to disabling if no one else does. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks EggRoll. Reading the discussion, I understand Geardona's frustration, but at the end of the day, it's entirely optional to add rcats. I felt that way when I first started patrolling redirects as well, but I think the filter may imply it's a worse sin than it is, despite the intention to use said filter to find redirects to categorize. Feels like there's gotta be a better way though if the intention is to lower the number of uncategorized redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
@Hey man im josh: Given it's attracted a lot of participation on the original creation (not well-advertised, but seemed to get a significant amount of participation for a filter creation), I'd probably say a short post to WP:EFN would work for disabling it, and I'll toss the switch after a couple days if no one has anything to say about it. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Candidate instructions

Administrator Elections | Instructions for candidates

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2024 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 15–21: SecurePoll setup phase
  • October 22–24: Discussion phase
  • October 25–31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–?: Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the SecurePoll setup phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend the SecurePoll setup phase from October 15–21 getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 22–24. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as a request for adminship (RfA). Please make sure you are around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RfA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must have received at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

You're receiving this message because you are a candidate in the October 2024 administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

Our Admin Election Test

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 21:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

I voted for you!

I voted for you. I don't share the emphasis on content creation that seems to run through a lot of the comments about admin selection. We can't create content without people running the system, behind the scenes, and who don't get much recognition. When I read your candidate statement, I said to myself "What the heck is edit filtering?" So I followed the links you gave about your activity and thought "this is something I didn't know about, and it's important". We need admins who know about the stuff that most of us don't know about! Good luck! 🤞 Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry it didn't work out. Please keep trying. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-45

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

Addition to filter 1318

Hi EggRoll, could you add namespace 10 (template) to the filter? It would stop edits like this one. I went through a few thousand of edits to test for false positives and haven't found any yet. Thanks Nobody (talk) 15:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

@1AmNobody24: Done. EggRoll97 (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-46

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-47

MediaWiki message delivery 01:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)