User talk:Eegorr

Welcome!

Hello, Eegorr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Pointe LaRoche 05:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Meat Loaf Bad Attitude.jpg

Whatever rationale you use for the other album covers for Meat Loaf (and other artists) should apply here. If you feel it is necessary to handle this one as a special case... delete away! It is no skin off my nose... just trying to add some value here. Eegorr (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Meat Loaf Bad Attitude.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sahuaro HS Cougar Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sahuaro HS Cougar Logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HR 669

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Raúl_Grijalva and several other articles about U.S. Congressmen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please stop adding disparaging comments about HR 669 to articles about Congressmen. Your statements are opinion, not fact, and they are not supported by the citation given. --Orlady (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You read the entire text of the bill and came to the conclusion that it does not support my statement? Read it again. Eegorr (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read through the bill. Your statement is your own opinion about it, reflecting your interests and biases. If you want to tell the world what's wrong with the bill, I suggest that you start a blog, write letters to the editor, and write your own Congressman -- just don't use Wikipedia for this purpose. Wikipedia is not a platform for personal opinion and it does not accept original research. --Orlady (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that wikipedia is probably not the forum for it, my statement was factual, not opinion. Assuming you are a pet owner, how would you feel if a law was passed that prohibited you from taking your dog or cat across state lines, even temporarily? What if you decided to move to take a job or to be closer to a family member in a different state and you had to leave your pet behind, except that you can't sell or give it away to anyone (including shelters) so the only recourse would be putting the pet down? You wouldn't even be able to leave the pet to anyone in your will should it survive you!

Not to single it out amongst the other junk that comes out of congress these days, but this piece of legislation is a disaster in the making, like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture on the wall! I feel better after watching the testimony this morning since it is clear that nothing even closely resembling this bill will ever make it to a full vote, thanks to participants like Marshall Meyers. If you are interested, you can view archived video of the hearing and read prepared testimony here. Eegorr (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line here is that Wikipedia is not the proper forum for your observations on this topic. (See WP:NOT.) --Orlady (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tucson images

Hi there,

Sorry about the image deletions, I came across a user who almost certainly was lying about the copyright status of a bunch of images, I found a few of them on the web that were clearly there before they were on-wiki. A few of them were kind of fluff images, like File:Continental Ranch.jpg, which was an aerial image of a suburban housing development, an image of a golf course which claimed that it used reclaimed water for irrigation (but it really just looked like a golf course) and an image of the Westin La Paloma resort to decorate the section on North Tucson. The image that I thought was a nice addition was an aerial image of aircraft sitting at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, though it was pretty much decoration, too. These are all nice images to have in the article, but not when they're almost certainly images that the user found out on the web. If you're interested in taking some yourself, that would be fantastic, though I wouldn't worry too much about trying to duplicate the ones deleted. Just get some nice iconic shots from each neighborhood to add some color to those sections. However, I have listed an image of the Pima County Courthouse and I'm about to list an image of the Unisource Energy Tower for deletion, and those are both images that would be very nice to have, so if you can take decent photos of those two buildings and replace them, it would be very nice. Please let me know if I can be of any help in getting those photos uploaded.

I visited Tucson a few months ago and quite enjoyed it. I wish I had taken some more photos.

Thanks! kmccoy (talk) 07:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can get pictures of the courthouse and Unisource tower, no problem. Both photos appear in several articles, so they would be missed. It might take me a few days to get them, though - how long do I have until the current pictures are deleted? I was suspicious of that map myself - unless the uploader is the publisher of that map it is probably a violation.

I was already going to get a few more photos, including one of downtown from "A" Mountain for the infobox. I think the photo of La Paloma might be nice, along with photos of a couple more resorts in town. I can't duplicate the aerial photo, of course, but it probably won't be missed - everyone has access to aerial photos these days. The photo of the golf course is more relevant since there are something like 32 of them in town and they use a lot of our scarce resource, water, so the reclamaton issue is probably worth illustrating. Do you know what golf course it was? Can you send me a url to the same photo on the internet?

As for the boneyard, it is difficult to get a good photo of it from the ground, but I can get a photo of some of the planes in the Pima Air Museum, which is almost as good. I may be able to think of a few more - what pictures do you have from your visit, and what do you wish you would have gotten?

Hope you were here more than a few months ago - June, July, and August are our worst months, like the dead of winter in Minnesota! Even May can be unbearable - I think we broke 100 for the first time here in late April this year. The best time to visit is February or March, and that is a great time to get out of MN as well! Eegorr (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found a replacement for the boneyard photo and one for the courthouse as well. Eegorr (talk) 22:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took a ton of photos from A Mountain while I was there, I'll see if any look decent. I'll figure out a way for you to see the golf course photo. Do you use IRC? Nicely done on the replacement photos. I was there at the end of May, and I actually found it to be quite nice. I travel pretty extensively, and I don't get to pick my itinerary, so I've been to some pretty hot places in the dead of summer. Tucson wasn't that bad, though I didn't really do a ton of walking outside. I wound up spending one day doing a day trip up to the Grand Canyon (a long ways, but I'd never been there and I wasn't sure when I'd get back out to the southwest again, so I had to do it,) one day walking around town, one day driving around including going up to the top of A Mountain, and then four days working. :) kmccoy (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation and quotation marks

Hi, Eegorr. I noticed that in some recent edits, you have been moving punctuation marks such as periods to be inside quotation marks (e.g., changing ". to ."). I wonder if you are aware of the guideline at MOS:LQ, which explains the Wikipedia standard for how quotation marks relate to other punctuation. In some instances you have changed the punctuation contrary to the guideline. For example, in this edit, you moved a period inside the quotation marks, when the period did not appear in the original material that was being quoted. I know that some style guidelines call for punctuation to be handled this way, but Wikipedia's guidelines say to include the period inside the quotation marks only if it was part of the original quoted material. I've reverted this, and wanted to leave you some explanation. Let me know if you have any questions. --RL0919 (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is contrary to standard US English. In addition, it is rarely consistent within a given article. But I bow to the powers that be...Eegorr (talk) 00:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1975 American Airlines Tennis Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Alexander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pernell Roberts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pygmalion and Bernard Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Biggs

I would appreciate if you would comment on the talk page of the article and not in my personal one, when you want consensus on an edit you made. --FantinoFalco (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, at least I'm still around. Did you quit or was your account deleted? Seems like we will never know. Eegorr (talk) 03:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jorm (talk) 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is a talk page not for discussion? Tyrants like you are why I spend almost no time editing the Wikipedia anymore. I will no longer donate, either. Frankly, I would prefer to see this enterprise die a slow, agonizing death than contribute to keeping it alive. Eegorr (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]