User talk:Edwarddutton

Archives

Arc contenders

Good work on Treve. Just so we don't duplicate, I have Kizuna in my sandbox atm. Busy weekend! Tigerboy1966 14:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noble Mission

I think we can safely say that Noble Mission is now worth an article of his own. He's changed from the horse who always ran well but couldn't win a big one into a bit of a "win machine". Tigerboy1966 14:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

His big brother would be very proud of him! --Bcp67 (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Noble Mission) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Noble Mission, Edwarddutton!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your GA nomination of Danehill Dancer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danehill Dancer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danehill Dancer

The article Danehill Dancer you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Danehill Dancer for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 19:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander mare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander mare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander mare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Novae

Template:Novae has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]