User talk:Edward PhoneGenius

This is Edward PhoneGenius's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edward PhoneGenius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has zero reliable independent sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission does not represent a usable Wikipedia item. Advice and links have been left by earlier reviewers but there has not been enough improvement. Review the guide to article creation, the manual of style and the guidelines to adding sources. Sourcing is required so a reader can verify the information. Just putting the name of a device between ref tags is not sufficient. If re-submiited without improvement the item could be rejected (as against declined for improvement).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

disruptive editing

It is entirely disruptive to continually resubmit your draft User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox without addressing any of the concerns in the comments. Articles require independent reliable sources, your draft has none so will cannot be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spicy was: undefined The comment the reviewer left was: This has been submitted five times and still fails to cite sources in a verifiable manner, demonstrate notability, or clearly explain what the topic is. I'm not even sure if this is a real thing or not.

Spicy (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox

Hello, Edward PhoneGenius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Edward PhoneGenius/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]