User talk:Eduardo Corrêa

Welcome!

Hello, Eduardo Corrêa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --vineeth 05:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles disappear

Articles can be deleted if they do not comply with policy. Have you asked an Administrator to look at them to see if they have been deleted, and why? --Rodhull andemu 15:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your post at WP:ANB implied you are writing articles on pt:wikipedia. If the deleted articles were there you need to speak to administrators on the Portuguese Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 09:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Michelle Brooke

The article Michelle Brooke, which you marked for speedy deletion, is part of a series on So You Think You Can Dance contestants, and as such appears to be notable enough to warrant the article. While the article has issues that need to be addressed, I don't see any reason for it to be deleted, and I've removed the tag. -HamatoKameko (talk) 23:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, very much. Michelle Brooke --Eduardo Corrêa (talk) 6:46 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Anytime. :D -HamatoKameko (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashlé Dawson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashlé Dawson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michelle Brooke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michelle Brooke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ajapa

The article Ajapa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Only refs I can find are a mix of 1 line mentions with a indication of pseudoscience in the process.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]