User talk:Edouglasww

Late Cambrian (band) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Late Cambrian (band). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! I have a lot more links to interviews/reviews for sources, but didn't have enough time to really put all of it together (including more of the band's history)... just wanted to get a start on creating the page, so I'll keep working on it in drafts and submit when it's ready. Edouglasww (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Late Cambrian (band) (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Late Cambrian (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edouglasww! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Late Cambrian (band) (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Late Cambrian (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Late Cambrian (band) (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Late Cambrian (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I'm being prejudiced against by the Wiki editors who are casually reviewing the work I've done and declining this page as not having reliable sources. I am up to 25 references now, and I've seen multiple band pages that have been accepted to Wikipedia with similar sources, bands that are newer, have less records released and less other projects cited as why they deserve to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Please advise because I'm ready to go to higher-ups about this. Edouglasww (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

Please read WP:SCAM. Wikipedia is the #7 website in the the world with tens of billions of pageviews per month, and every word you write anywhere on Wikipedia is public. Scammers are constantly using sophisticated automated search techniques looking for people like you who are trying hard to get a Wikipedia article accepted, in the hope of separating them from their money. Please be very careful. Cullen328 (talk) 08:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fortunately, this is an indie band who probably couldn't afford the money they were asking for. I've been doing my work as a fan of the band who is puzzled why they don't have a presence on here despite their association with other known acts that have Wikipedia pages. The reason I've been putting all this work in is because I have friends who I tell about the band, and the very first thing they do is go to Wikipedia trying to find more information... and there isn't even a basic page that other bands have been given. It just seems unfair and ridiculous. Edouglasww (talk) 08:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]